Surgical safety checklist: an element of work organization in the operating theater / Lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica: um elemento de organização do trabalho no bloco cirúrgico

Objectives: the surgical safety checklist (SSC) is a document that is intended to increase patient safety in the operating theater by eliminating avoidable errors. The original document has been published in English by the WHO which recommends its obligatory use. The document's name is often distorted when translated into European languages, for instance into the "surgical control list". This article aims to assess the consequences of the distortion of the originally intended meaning for the completion of SSC in the operating theater. Methods: we compared the exactness of the meaning of translation in 29 European languages based on Google translator. Particular attention was paid to the presence of essential words such as "checklist" and "safety" in the translation. Results: we found that in 15 out of the 29 languages, the translation of these two words was incorrect, particularly in Slavic languages. The most often mistranslation was the "control card" or "control list", which was a misnomer. Conclusions: the translation of the SSC name into native languages is inadequate in about one-half of the cases, which may jeopardize its proper use by team members of the operating theater, and thus the patient perioperative safety.

Objetivo: a lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica (SSC) é um documento que visa aumentar a segurança do paciente no centro cirúrgico, eliminando possíveis erros. O documento original foi publicado em inglês pela OMS que recomenda seu uso obrigatório. O nome do documento é frequentemente distorcido quando traduzido para idiomas europeus, por exemplo, na "lista de controle cirúrgico". Este artigo visa avaliar as consequências da distorção do significado originalmente pretendido para a realização do SSC na sala de cirurgia. Métodos: para isso, comparamos a exatidão do significado da tradução em 29 idiomas europeus com base no tradutor do Google. Atenção especial foi dada para a presença de palavras essenciais como "lista de verificação" e "segurança" na tradução. Resultados: descobrimos que em 15 dos 29 idiomas, a tradução dessas duas palavras estava incorreta, principalmente em idiomas eslavos. A tradução incorreta mais frequente era o "cartão de controle" ou "lista de controle", o que era um equívoco. Conclusão: a tradução do nome do SSC para as línguas nativas é inadequada em cerca de metade dos casos, o que pode comprometer seu uso adequado pelos membros da equipe de centro cirúrgico e, portanto, a segurança perioperatória do paciente.

Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding World Health Organization surgical safety checklist and the challenges in its implementation at a teaching hospital in North India

Background: The WHO in 2009 published the surgical safety checklist (SSC) for reducing the surgical complications. For its successful implementation it is imperative to identify the current knowledge, attitude and practices of the involved personnel and explore the anticipated barriers. Objective of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitude and practices of the participants about the SSC and determine the possible challenges in its implementation.Methods: This study is a descriptive, cross-sectional study involving the use of a pre-tested questionnaire carried out in a teaching hospital. All personnel involved in the operation theater who gave their written consent were enrolled.Results: Awareness regarding the SSC is high and existing practices are favorable towards patient safety amongst Hospital personnel. Attempts should be made to educate all personnel to gain complete knowledge regarding the checklist. The anticipated barriers, of which lack of knowledge was found to be the most prominent, should be dealt with.Conclusions: A strategy aimed at proper education, stepwise implementation, alleviating the hindrances and regular feedbacks can result in decreasing the surgery related complications and morbidities through implementation of the surgical safety checklist.

Effect of Adherence to the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist on Morbidity and Mortality in a Defined Surgical Patient Population

To improve patient safety and prevent complications, WHO introduced surgical safety checklist (WHO SSC). However, the actual effect of WHO SSC on patient morbidity, particularly surgical site infections (SSI), and mortality on post-operative patients is one of the least studied area. Our study was to measure the effects surgical safety checklists have in reducing morbidities and complications, particularly surgical site infections, post-operative length of stay and mortality resulting from the surgical procedures. Methods: A prospective observational comparative study was conducted among all patients who underwent elective general surgical procedures from 01st July 2015 to 30th June 2016 in the Main OT Complex (OT1 and OT2), Indoor Surgical Wards and higher dependency units (ITU & CCU) of IPGMER & SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, after applying proper exclusion criteria. Pre-implementation (before implementation of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist) data was collected for first 6 months, then WHO Surgical Safety Checklist was implemented over next 6 months. Pre and post-implementation cohorts were compared and analysed. Results: Total 382 patients (187 Control group and 195 implementation group) were included. Both groups matched regarding age, sex, type of surgery, type of anaesthesia, post-operative length of stay. However, incidence of SSI significantly decreased (30.48% to 16.41%, p value 0.002, <0.05, statistically significant). Overall complication rate, unplanned return to operating room (OR) also decreased though the results were statistically not significant. Conclusion: Implementation of WHO SSC decreases morbidity related to SSI significantly. Further studies are required to assess the effects on mortality and unplanned return to OR.

A survey of the ten-year implementation of WHO surgical safety checklist in China / 中华麻醉学杂志

Objective@#To investigate the current status of the ten-year implementation of the World Health Organization (WHO) surgical safety checklist (SSC) in China.@*Methods@#A questionnaire was designed based on the three phases described by the checklist — the period before induction of anaesthesia, the period before skin incision, and the period before patient leaves operating room, taking into account some hotspots and disputes.The questionnaire was sent to the members of the Chinese-based online New Youth Anesthesia Forum through the WeChat platform.Answers were completed by mobile phones or desktop computers.Each WeChat ID number allowed only one answer for each individual participant.@*Results@#A total of 3 943 members red the questionnaire invitation, of which 2 121 members completed the questionnaire with an overall completion rate of 53.79%.For checks completed before induction of anesthesia, the percentage of members who routinely practiced checks before induction of anesthesia was 93.35%, the percentage of members who completed each and every element of the checklist was 60.16%, and the percentage of members who selected the element of the checklist the surgeon was not involved in the check was 14.05%.For checks practiced before skin incision, the percentage of members who routinely completed checks before skin incision was 78.22%, the percentage of members who completed each and every element of the checklist was 51.91%, and the percentage of members who selected the element of the checklist surgeons and anesthesiologists routinely stated their own professional key information was 18.24% and 18.81%, respectively.For checks practiced before the patient leaved the operating room, the percentage of members who routinely completed checks before removing the patient from the operating room was 64.26%, and the percentage of members who completed each and every element of the checklist was 44.18%.The percentage of members who was really serious about practicing the checklist was 56.20%.The percentage of members who believed that surgeons should participated in checks practiced before induction of anesthesia was 81.47%.If the member himself or a member of his family needed a surgery, the percentage of members who hoped to implement the checklist was 98.35%.The percentage of members who believed that practicing WHO SSC could reduce the complications of surgery and improve the anesthetic safety of patients was 94.34%.@*Conclusion@#The implementing rate of checks practiced before induction of anesthesia is high, while the implementing rates of checks completed before skin incision and before patient leaves operating room are sequentially reduced in China.Although there are some problems with the implementation of WHO SSC, most respondents believe that implementing SSC can improve the anesthetic safety of patients undergoing surgery.

A survey of the ten-year implementation of WHO surgical safety checklist in China / 中华麻醉学杂志

Objective To investigate the current status of the ten-year implementation of the World Health Organization (WHO) surgical safety checklist (SSC) in China.Methods A questionnaire was designed based on the three phases described by the checklist — the period before induction of anaesthesia,the period before skin incision,and the period before patient leaves operating room,taking into account some hotspots and disputes.The questionnaire was sent to the members of the Chinese-based online New Youth Anesthesia Forum through the WeChat platform.Answers were completed by mobile phones or desktop computers.Each WeChat ID number allowed only one answer for each individual participant.Results A total of 3 943 members red the questionnaire invitation,of which 2 121 members completed the questionnaire with an overall completion rate of 53.79％.For checks completed before induction of anesthesia,the percentage of members who routinely practiced checks before induction of anesthesia was 93.35％,the percentage of members who completed each and every element of the checklist was 60.16％,and the percentage of members who selected the element of the checklist the surgeon was not involved in the check was 14.05％.For checks practiced before skin incision,the percentage of members who routinely completed checks before skin incision was 78.22％,the percentage of members who completed each and every element of the checklist was 51.91％,and the percentage of members who selected the element of the checklist surgeons and anesthesiologists routinely stated their own professional key information was 18.24％ and 18.81％,respectively.For checks practiced before the patient leaved the operating room,the percentage of members who routinely completed checks before removing the patient from the operating room was 64.26％,and the percentage of members who completed each and every element of the checklist was 44.18％.The percentage of members who was really serious about practicing the checklist was 56.20％.The percentage of members who believed that surgeons should participated in checks practiced before induction of anesthesia was 81.47％.If the member himself or a member of his family needed a surgery,the percentage of members who hoped to implement the checklist was 98.35％.The percentage of members who believed that practicing WHO SSC could reduce the complications of surgery and improve the anesthetic safety of patients was 94.34％.Conclusion The implementing rate of checks practiced before induction of anesthesia is high,while the implementing rates of checks completed before skin incision and before patient leaves operating room are sequentially reduced in China.Although there are some problems with the implementation of WHO SSC,most respondents believe that implementing SSC can improve the anesthetic safety of patients undergoing surgery.

Lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica: evidências para a implementação em serviços de saúde / Surgical safety checklist: evidence for implementation in health services

A segurança do paciente cirúrgico é problemática complexa e desafiadora em âmbito global. A presente pesquisa teve como objetivos (a) analisar as evidências disponíveis na literatura sobre o processo de implementação da lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica da Organização Mundial da Saúde na prática dos serviços de saúde, e (b) analisar o processo de implementação e o uso diário da lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica, segundo o relato de enfermeiros que atuavam em unidades de centro cirúrgico de hospitais de duas cidades localizadas no estado do Paraná. A pesquisa foi conduzida em duas fases: revisão integrativa e estudo descritivo. A busca dos estudos primários foi realizada nas bases de dados PubMed, CINAHL e LILACS. A amostra da revisão integrativa foi composta de 27 pesquisas agrupadas em três categorias, a saber: processo de implementação: estratégias para introdução da lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica nos serviços de saúde (n=15); processo de implementação: estratégias para otimização do uso da lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica nos serviços de saúde (n=9) e facilitadores e barreiras para implementação da lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica nos serviços de saúde (n=3). A condução da revisão integrativa possibilitou compreender o processo de implementação da lista, as diferentes estratégias utilizadas para sua implantação, aspectos da implementação considerados bem-sucedidos ou pouco exitosos no alcance dos resultados esperados, facilitadores e barreiras deste processo. O estudo descritivo foi realizado em 25 hospitais de duas cidades que compõem a mesorregião do Norte Central Paranaense (Londrina e Maringá). Os participantes foram 91 enfermeiros que atuavam em centro cirúrgico dos hospitais selecionados. Para a coleta de dados elaborou-se dois instrumentos, os quais foram submetidos à validação aparente e de conteúdo. Os resultados evidenciaram que, na maioria dos hospitais investigados, a lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica foi implementada, sendo que, para a maioria dos participantes, as estratégias adotadas na introdução da lista foram o planejamento prévio conduzido pelos enfermeiros, a adaptação com predominância do uso no formato impresso e programa educacional. Com relação ao uso diário da lista, a maioria dos enfermeiros apontou a utilização inadequada desta prática nos seguintes aspectos: adesão parcial ao uso pela equipe cirúrgica, diferença de adesão entre as etapas de checagem e entre as categorias profissionais e condutas inadequadas da equipe cirúrgica na checagem da lista em sala cirúrgica (equipe incompleta, desatenta e sem participação ativa de seus membros). Para a maioria dos participantes, o uso da lista trouxe benefícios ou tem potencial para produzir efeitos benéficos para o paciente, equipe cirúrgica e serviço de saúde. As evidências geradas trazem subsídios para os enfermeiros e demais profissionais de saúde na elaboração de protocolos relativos ao processo de implementação ou uso diário da lista mais adequados e compatíveis com as especificidades estruturais e organizacionais dos serviços de saúde nacionais, com o propósito de viabilizar a integração desta ferramenta no processo de trabalho, melhorar a adesão da equipe e alcançar os melhores resultados em prol da segurança do paciente

Surgical patient safety is a complex and challenging problem at the global level. This study aimed to analyze (a) the available evidence in the literature on the process of implementation of the surgical safety checklist of the World Health Organization in the practice of health services, and (b) the implementation process and the daily use of the surgical safety checklist, according to the report of nurses working in surgical center units of hospitals of two cities located in the state of Paraná. The research was conducted in two phases: integrative review and descriptive study. The search for primary studies was carried out in PubMed, CINAHL and LILACS databases. The sample of the integrative review consisted of 27 studies grouped into three categories, namely: implementation process: strategies for the introduction of the surgical safety checklist in the health services (n = 15); implementation process: strategies to optimize the use of the surgical safety checklist in health services (n = 9) and facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the surgical safety checklist (n = 3). Conducting the integrative review made it possible to understand the process of implementing the list, the different strategies used for its implementation, aspects of implementation considered successful or not very successful in achieving the expected results, facilitators and barriers of this process. The descriptive study was carried out in 25 hospitals of two cities that make up the mesoregion of Northern Central of Paraná state (Londrina and Maringá). Participants were 91 nurses who worked in the surgical center of the selected hospitals. For the data collection, two instruments were elaborated, which were submitted to the apparent validation and content. The results showed that, in most of the hospitals investigated, the surgical safety checklist was implemented, and, for most of the participants, the strategies adopted in the introduction of the list were the previous planning conducted by the nurses, the adaptation with predominance of the use in the printed format and educational program. Regarding the daily use of the list, most of the nurses pointed out the inadequate use of this practice in the following aspects: surgical team's partial adherence to the use of it, difference in adherence between the check-up stages, and between the professional categories and inadequate behavior of the surgical team in checking the list in the surgical room (incomplete, inattentive team, and members not taking part actively). For most participants, using the list has brought benefits or can potentially produce beneficial effects for the patient, surgical team, and health service. The evidence generated provides subsidies for nurses and other health professionals in elaborating protocols related to the implementation process or daily use of the list more adequate and compatible with the structural and organizational specificities of the national health services, in order to make feasible the integration of this tool into the work process, to improve team adherence and to achieve the best results for patient safety

Safety Management for MR-Guided Interventions

PURPOSE: Operating room management is the serious and complex task for hospital managers and the common approach is to develop relevant standard operational procedures. From patient and staff safety perspective, operating room management should be well-studied and hospital should identify and address any potential risks. Simultaneous usage of different imaging and less-invasive treatment technologies demands strong management control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have formed the multidisciplinary expert panel (surgeons, anesthesiologists, radiologists, healthcare managers etc.) for hybrid theater management standard operational procedure development. On the first stage the general concept of hybrid room design and patient routing was developed. The second stage included the technical details discussion. For patient safety improvement we modified the Surgical Safety Check-list in accordance with potential MRI-related safety challenges and concerns. RESULTS: WHO Surgical Safety Checklist is a simple and easy-to use tool which includes three blocks of question (grouped by the surgery process). We have developed two additional blocks of questions for the intraoperative magnetic resonance investigation. It is very important to have a special detailed routing with a strong control of ferromagnetic devices and anesthesiology care. CONCLUSION: High-energy MRI (1.5-3.0T) is characterized by potential influence on patient and staff safety in case of hybrid surgery. It is obvious to have a strong managerial control of ferromagnetic devices and anesthesiology care. Surgical Safety Checklist is the validated tool for improving patient safety. Modification and customization of this check-list potentially provides the opportunity for surgery processes improving.