Accuracy of Choline PET/CT vs. Tc 99m Sestamibi SPECT/CT parathyroid imaging in comparison to histopathology in the diagnosis of parathyroid adenoma : A meta-analysis

Introduction@#In the advent of the recently accepted use of Choline in parathyroid PET/CT, we aimed to assess its accuracy in diagnosing parathyroid adenomas in comparison to the Tc 99m Sestamibi SPECT/CT parathyroid imaging, with histopathology as the reference standard.@*Objective@#To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Choline PET/CT in comparison to Tc 99m Sestamibi parathyroid imaging in detecting parathyroid adenomas, with histopathology as the reference standard. @*Methods@#Cross-sectional studies from 2014 to 2019 were identified through MEDLINE, Pubmed, clinicaltrials.gov, and Google scholar. Our literature search yielded 13 articles, of which only 3 met the set inclusion and exclusion criteria.@*Results@#Three published cross-sectional studies were included with a total of population of 157 patients. Choline PET/CT was found to have a pooled sensitivity of 0.99 (0.96 - 1.00), pooled specificity of 0.45 (0.17 - 0.77), positive likelihood ratio of 1.79 (1.1 – 2.9), negative likelihood ratio of 0.03 (0.0 – 0.1), positive predictive value of 96.0% (93.4 - 97.7%) and negative predictive value of 83.3% (39.0 - 97.6%), estimated with 95% CI. Tc 99m Sestamibi SPECT/CT parathyroid imaging had a pooled sensitivity of 0.77 (0.70-0.84), pooled specificity of 0.45 (0.17 - 0.77), positive likelihood ratio of 1.43 (0.8–2.4), negative likelihood ratio of 0.49 (0.2–1.4), positive predictive value of 96.0% (93.4-97.7%) and negative predictive value of 83.3% (39.0-97.6%), estimated with 95% CI@*Conclusion@#Choline PET/CT showed superior sensitivity, negative predictive value and negative likelihood ratio over Tc 99m Sestamibi SPECT/CT parathyroid imaging. The measured specificities, positive predictive values and positive likelihood ratios of both modalities were found to be similar.

Post-stress Measurements of Left Ventricular Function With Gated Perfusion SPECT: Comparison with Resting Measurements by using Exercise and Adenosine Stress

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate the relationship between myocardial perfusion defect in single photon emission tomography(SPECT) and the difference in left ventricular functional parameters obtained after stress and at rest. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty five patients known to have coronary artery disease (CAD) or suspected to have CAD underwent gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT using one or separate day rest/stress protocol. We compared post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF-s) with that at rest (LVEF-r) in gated myocardial SPECT. We considered myocardial stunning was developed when LVEF was >5% lower than that at rest. METHODS: Forty one (48%) patients demonstrated reversible or irreversible perfusion defects in gated perfusion SPECT (group 1). Forty four (52%) patients demonstrated normal perfusion status (group 2). In group 1, LVEF-s was significantly lower than that at rest([mean+/-SD] 46+/-15.5 vs 48+/-16.0 respectively, p5% lower than LVEF-r. CONCLUSION: The LVEF obtained after stress with gated SPECT may not reflect true resting values. We recommend gated myocardial perfusion SPECT should be performed also at rest especially in patients with myocardial perfusion defects.

Assessments of myocardial perfusion in human using stress intravenous PESDA myocardial contrast echocardiography and Pulse Inversion Harmonic Imaging: A Comparison study with Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT

OBJECTIVE: The object of this study was to assess the accuracy of dipyridamole stress intravenous (IV) myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) using pulse inversion harmonic imaging and PESDA in the detection of perfusion defect in the patients with coronary artery disease in comparison with dipyridamole stress Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. METHODS: Total 46 patients (29 males, mean age 64 years old) were consecutively enrolled. Patients with prior myocardial infarction were excluded. MCE and Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT were performed at the same day during rest and after 0.56 or 0.84mg/Kg dipyridamole infusion. Continuous IV infusion of PESDA (2-5 mL/min) was administered while obtaining triggered (1:1) end-systolic apical 2, 4 chamber and long axis views. Tc-99m sestamibi was injected 3 minutes after dipyridamole. Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT images were obtained one hour later. Coronary angiography was followed within two days in all patients. Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT images were matched to the sixteen segments of left ventricle according to American Society of Echocardiography for segmental comparison. Both images were analyzed visually. Results Using coronary angiography as the standard, MCE showed overall sensitivity of 70.7%, specificity of 95.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 87.8% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88.5% in the detection of coronary atherosclerosis (70% stenosis). Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT showed sensitivity of 75.6%, specificity of 98.9%, PPV of 96.8% and NPV of 90.6%. The overall concordance rate between MCE and Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT for the detection of perfusion defects was 86.9% (Cohen's kappa value 0.63) according to the coronary territory and 86.8% (Cohen's kappa value 0.55) according to segmental analysis. CONCLUSION: Dipyridamole stress IV MCE using pulse inversion harmonic imaging and PESDA is feasible and comparable to Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT in identifying significant coronary stenosis and inducible myocardial perfusion defects in the patients with coronary artery disease. MCE using pulse inversion harmonic imaging seems to be a promising modality for assessing myocardial perfusion in the patients with suspected coronary artery disease.