Application effect evaluation of the best evidence for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography or intervention / 中国实用护理杂志

Objective:To apply the best evidence for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography or intervention to clinical practice and evaluate its effect.Methods:This was a quasi-experimental study. Based on the evidence continuous quality improvement model, evidence-based practice method was used to obtain the best evidence, formulated review indicators, analyzed the obstacles in the practice process and took action strategies. The 88 patients who underwent transradial coronary angiography or intervention in the Cardiology Department of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao) from June 1 to 30, 2020 were selected as the baseline review group by convenience sampling. The 94 patients who underwent this treatment from September 1 to 30, 2020 were selected as the evidence application group. The baseline review group used the original perioperative management plan, and the evidence application group used the perioperative management plan based on the best evidence. The implementation rate of each review indicator, the incidence of radial artery occlusion, the degree of compression pain, and the comfort level of patients were compared between the two groups.Results:The implementation rates of review indicators 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 in the evidence application group were 100.0% (94/94), 100.0% (94/94), 11.7(11/94), 88.3% (83/94), 100.0% (94/94), 100.0%(94/94), 85.1%(80/94), respectively, which were higher than those in the baseline review group(all 0), except for the review indicator 4, the differences were statistically significant ( χ2 values were 9.00-178.02, all P<0.05). The incidence of radial artery occlusion and the incidence of pain Numerical Rating Scale>3 points in the evidence application group were 2.1% (2/94) and 3.2% (3/94), respectively, which were lower than 14.8% (13/88) and 23.9% (21/88) in the baseline review group; the comfort level of patients in the evidence application group was 96.8% (91/94), which was higher than 63.6% (56/88) in the baseline review group. The differences were statistically significant ( χ2 = 8.01, 15.21, 30.10, all P<0.05). Conclusions:The best evidence for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography or intervention can be applied to clinical practice, which can standardize the behavior of medical staff, reduce the incidence of postoperative radial artery occlusion, reduce the degree of compression pain, and improve the comfort of patients.

Initial experience of cardiac catheterization through distal radial access in a femoralist center / Experiencia inicial de cateterización cardiaca mediante acceso radial distal en un centro femoralista

Objective: to share our experience in the radial distal approach to perform coronary angiography and / or dilation of coronary stenosis. The initial results are exposed in the access of the distal radial artery or in the so-called anatomical "snuff box". Methods: The left or right radial distal artery was used as an access site in 6 patients admitted to the Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery for coronary angiography and dilatation of coronary stenosis between May 6 and June 6 of 2019. All with pulse present in their distal radial artery. In the laboratory, they had the access arm flexed with respect to the homolateral shoulder so that the hand was placed on their contralateral groin. In all cases, the operator was placed on the right side of the patient, to perform coronary angiography and / or dilation of coronary stenosis. During the hospital stay, the main demographic characteristics and complications were recorded. Results: the average age of the patients was 72 +/- 10 years and 83.3 percent were men. We use the Judkins and Amplatz 6 and 5 French catheters for the procedures. Five admitted with the diagnosis of angina and one with severe aortic valve stenosis. In 5 patients, distal transradial coronary angiography was successfully performed. Only one patient experienced distal radial spasm, using in this case the ipsilateral proximal radial access, without making it necessary to approach the femoral artery. In total, 4 patients had coronary intervention, performing successfully in the 4 patients. The right coronary artery was the artery that required most of the intervention (3 patients). There were no cases of occlusion of the radial arteries, no hematoma of the hand, of the B.A.R.C scale greater than 1 was observed in any patient. Numbness of the hand was documented in none. The radial introducer was removed at the end of the procedure. Hemostasis was achieved with manual compression. Conclusion: the distal radial approach is feasible in a selected group of patients as a procedure for coronary angiography and dilatation of coronary stenosis(AU)

Objetivo: compartir nuestra experiencia en el abordaje radial distal para realizar la angiografía coronaria y/o la dilatación de la estenosis coronaria. Se exponen los resultados iniciales en el acceso de la arteria radial distal o en la llamada "tabaquera" anatómica. Métodos: se utilizó la arteria radial distal izquierda o derecha como sitio de acceso en 6 pacientes ingresados en el Instituto de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular para angiografía coronaria y dilatación de estenosis coronaria del 6 de mayo al 6 de junio de 2019. Todos los pacientes tenían pulso en la arteria radial distal. En el laboratorio, se les flexionó el brazo de acceso con respecto al hombro homolateral de modo que la mano descansara sobre la ingle contralateral. En todos los casos, el técnico se situó a la derecha del paciente para realizar la angiografía coronaria y/o dilatación de la estenosis coronaria. Durante la estancia de los pacientes en el hospital, se registraron sus principales características demográficas y complicaciones. Resultados: la edad promedio de los pacientes fue de 72 +/- 10 años y 83,3 por ciento eran hombres. Usamos catéteres franceses Judkins y Amplatz 6 y 5 para los procedimientos. Cinco pacientes habían sido ingresados con un diagnóstico de angina y uno con estenosis valvular aórtica severa. La angiografía coronaria transradial distal fue exitosa en 5 pacientes. Solo un paciente experimentó un espasmo distal radial, usándose en ese caso el acceso radial proximal ipsilateral sin que fuera necesario abordar la arteria femoral. Un total de 4 pacientes se sometieron a intervención coronaria, la que fue exitosa en los 4. La arteria coronaria derecha fue la que requirió la mayor parte de la intervención (3 pacientes). No hubo ningún caso de oclusión de las arterias radiales ni de hematoma de la mano. Tampoco se observó un valor de la escala BARC mayor de 1 en ningún paciente. No se documentó entumecimiento de la mano en ningún paciente. El introductor radial se retiró al final del procedimiento. La hemostasia se alcanzó mediante compresión manual. Conclusión: el abordaje radial distal es factible en un grupo seleccionado de pacientes como procedimiento para la angiografía coronaria y la dilatación de la estenosis coronaria(AU)