Résumé
Objective:To investigate the effect of ulinastatin injection on left ventricular diastolic function and prognosis in patients with sepsis.Methods:A total of 100 patients with sepsis admitted to the Intensive Care Unit from January 2021 to March 2022 were selected. According to the random number table, they were randomly (random number) divided into the control group (conventional treatment) and experimental group (conventional treatment + ulinastatin injection). The baseline data on admission were compared between the two groups. The echocardiographic indexes [mitral peak velocity of early filling/early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/e'), early diastolic mitral annular velocity (e'), mitral peak velocity of early filling/ mitral peak velocity of late filling (E/A), and tricuspid regurgitation rate (TRV)], myocardial damage-related and cardiac function-related indicators [troponin I (cTnI), N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP)] and inflammation-related indicators [C-reaction protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)], length of ICU stay, duration of infection control, duration of vasoactive drug use and 28-day mortality were observed and compared between the two groups on admission and 7 days after treatment.Results:On the 7th day after treatment, the levels of e 'and E/A in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group, and the levels of E/e', TRV, cTnI, NTproBNP, CRP and PCT were significantly decreased ( P<0.05). There were no significant differences in duration of infection control and duration of vasoactive drug use between the experimental group and the control group ( P<0.05), but the length of ICU stay was shorter and 28-day mortality was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Ulinastatin can reduce the degree of inflammatory response, relieve myocardial injury, improve left ventricular diastolic function, and reduce the length of ICU stay and 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis.
Résumé
OBJECTIVE:To explore clinical efficacy and safety of Ulinastatin injection combined with Xingnaojing injec-tion in the treament of severe craniocerebral injury(CCI). METHODS:A total of 120 severe CCI patients selected from our hospital during Sept. 2014-Nov. 2015 were divided into ulinastatin group,Xingnaojing group and combination group according to therapy plan,with 40 cases in each group. Three groups were given routine treatment timely after admission. On the basis of routine treatment,Ulinastatin group additionally received Ulinastatin injection 200 000 U,ivgtt,bid;Xingnaojing group addi-tionally received Xingnaojing injection 20 mL,ivgtt,qd;combination group additionally received Ulinastatin injection com-bined with Xingnaojing injection,same usage as above(with 1 h intervals). Three groups received therapy for consecutive 14 d. Serum inflammatory factors(CRP,IL-1,IL-6,TNF-α),serologic indexes of craniocerebral injury [neuron specific enolase (NSE),myelin basic protein(MBP),S100B protein(S100B)] and GCS scores before and after treatment as well as GOS scores after treatment were all observed in 3 groups. The occurrence of ADR was recorded during treatment. RESULTS:Before treatment,there was no statistical significance in serum inflammatory factors,serologic indexes of craniocerebral injury or GCS scores among 3 groups(P>0.05). Compared to before treatment,inflammatory factors of 3 groups were decreased signifi-cantly after treatment,the ulinastatin group was significantly lower than the Xingnaojing group,combination group was signifi-cantly lower than two single drug groups,with statistical significance(P<0.05). Levels of serologic indexes of craniocerebral injury and GCS scores of 3 groups were improved significantly,and the combination group was significantly better than the two single drug groups,with statistical significance(P<0.05). There was no statistical significance between ulinastatin group and Xingnaojing group(P>0.05). Six months after treatment,GOS score of combination group(4.17±0.81)was significantly better than those of ulinastatin group(3.05±0.97)and Xing-naojing group(2.97 ± 0.89),with statistical significance (P<0.05);there was no statistical significance between ulinastatin group and Xingnaojing group(P>0.05). During treatment,the incidence of ADR in combination group(27.50%)was significantly lower than ulinastatin group(50.00%)and Xingnaojing group(42.50%),with statistical significance(P<0.05);there was no statistical significance between ulinastatin group and Xingnaojing group(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Ulinastatin injection combined with Xingnaojing injection can sig-nificantly decrease serum inflammatory factor levels,relieve craniocerebral injury,protect cerebral tissue and improve short-term prognosis with good safety.
Résumé
OBJECTIVE:To explore clinical efficacy and safety of Ulinastatin injection combined with Xingnaojing injec-tion in the treament of severe craniocerebral injury(CCI). METHODS:A total of 120 severe CCI patients selected from our hospital during Sept. 2014-Nov. 2015 were divided into ulinastatin group,Xingnaojing group and combination group according to therapy plan,with 40 cases in each group. Three groups were given routine treatment timely after admission. On the basis of routine treatment,Ulinastatin group additionally received Ulinastatin injection 200 000 U,ivgtt,bid;Xingnaojing group addi-tionally received Xingnaojing injection 20 mL,ivgtt,qd;combination group additionally received Ulinastatin injection com-bined with Xingnaojing injection,same usage as above(with 1 h intervals). Three groups received therapy for consecutive 14 d. Serum inflammatory factors(CRP,IL-1,IL-6,TNF-α),serologic indexes of craniocerebral injury [neuron specific enolase (NSE),myelin basic protein(MBP),S100B protein(S100B)] and GCS scores before and after treatment as well as GOS scores after treatment were all observed in 3 groups. The occurrence of ADR was recorded during treatment. RESULTS:Before treatment,there was no statistical significance in serum inflammatory factors,serologic indexes of craniocerebral injury or GCS scores among 3 groups(P>0.05). Compared to before treatment,inflammatory factors of 3 groups were decreased signifi-cantly after treatment,the ulinastatin group was significantly lower than the Xingnaojing group,combination group was signifi-cantly lower than two single drug groups,with statistical significance(P<0.05). Levels of serologic indexes of craniocerebral injury and GCS scores of 3 groups were improved significantly,and the combination group was significantly better than the two single drug groups,with statistical significance(P<0.05). There was no statistical significance between ulinastatin group and Xingnaojing group(P>0.05). Six months after treatment,GOS score of combination group(4.17±0.81)was significantly better than those of ulinastatin group(3.05±0.97)and Xing-naojing group(2.97 ± 0.89),with statistical significance (P<0.05);there was no statistical significance between ulinastatin group and Xingnaojing group(P>0.05). During treatment,the incidence of ADR in combination group(27.50%)was significantly lower than ulinastatin group(50.00%)and Xingnaojing group(42.50%),with statistical significance(P<0.05);there was no statistical significance between ulinastatin group and Xingnaojing group(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Ulinastatin injection combined with Xingnaojing injection can sig-nificantly decrease serum inflammatory factor levels,relieve craniocerebral injury,protect cerebral tissue and improve short-term prognosis with good safety.