Résumé
Objective To investigate the value of color Doppler flow imaging(CDFI) in diagnosing lower limb artery in-stent restenosis (ISR), and to provide the evidences for clinical application. Methods Patients with lower limb artery percutaneous transluminal stent insertion in 12 months were enrolled in this study and divided into two groups, CT angiography (CTA) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was applied to diagnose ISR, 31 patients with 47 stenting which were diagnosed ISR was named as restenosis group, 63 patients with 89 stenting which were diagnosed no ISR was named as no stenosis group, and 30 normal person was enrolled and named as normal control group. Ultrasonic characteristics and peak systolic blood flow velocity (PSV), systolic blood flow acceleration time (AT) of proximal part, inner stents, distal part were recorded in restenosis group and no stenosis group, then compared with data in normal control group. Regression and receiver operator (ROC) curve were applied to analyse the correlation between PSV and AT. Results PSV of no stenosis group in common femoral artery, femoral artery, superifcial, popliteal artery stent respectively were (146.71±35.59) cm/s, (120.11±25.67) cm/s, (96.44±32.87) cm/s. PSV of normal control group in common femoral artery, femoral artery, superifcial, popliteal artery respective were (119.67±15.34) cm/s, (91.17±15.09) cm/s, (71.13±21.23) cm/s. There was statistically signiifcant difference between the two groups (t=2.457, 2.459, 2.321, all P0.05). PSV of restenosis group in proximal part, restenosis part, distal part respectively were (87.67±23.34) cm/s, (218.17±72.09) cm/s, (54.13±21.23) cm/s. PSV of no stenosis group in proximal part, inner stents, distal part respectively were (91.71±25.59) cm/s, (131.11±45.67) cm/s, (96.44±32.87) cm/s. There was statistically significant difference between restenosis part/inner stents, distal part (t=3.412, 3.511, both P0.05). AT of restenosis group in proximal part, restenosis part, distal part respectively were (98.31±14.09) ms, (109.54±21.03) ms, (158.23±45.21) ms. AT of no stenosis group in proximal part, inner stents, distal part respectively were (84.98±13.77) ms, (86.34±19.36) ms, (83.77±17.05) ms. There was statistically signiifcant difference between restenosis part/inner stents, distal part (t=2.319, 3.610, both P0.05). ROC curve showed that in ISR lower limb artery, PSV>168 cm/s had a sensitivity of 89.4%, speciifcity of 92.1%, the area under the ROC curve was 0.949;AT>127 ms, had a sensitivity of 86.8%, speciifcity of 98.0%, the area under the ROC curve was 0.867. Conclusions CDFI can detect the changes of PSV and AT, ISR can be detected and diagnosed earlier in lower limb artery. By combining PSV>168 cm/s with AT>127 ms, the value of ISR diagnosis can be increased.
Résumé
Objective To explore differences of ultrasoundgraphy and CT guided percutaneous paracentesis for liver abscess and provide references for the paracentesis treating of liver abscess .Methods 68 patients with liver abscess arranged ultrasoundgraphy guided percutaneous paracentesis were regarded as ultrasound group ,and 38 patients accepted CT guided percutaneous paracentesis were considered as CT group .The succeed rate of paracentesis ,operation period ,treatment effectiveness ,complications of the 2 groups were compared .Results The succeed rate of paracentesis in ultrasound group (81 .7% ) was not different obviously to CT group(82 .6% ) (χ2 =0 .016 2 ,P=0 .898 6) .The operation period of ultrasound group(22 .3 ± 5 .6)min was shorten than CT group (25 .6 ± 4 .8)min ,t= 3 .057 4 ,P< 0 .05 .The heal rate of the 2 groups(91 .2% ,92 .1% ) was not different (χ2 = 0 .027 1 ,P=0 .869 3) .There was no different of the complications in the 2 groups(5 .88% ,8 .57% )(χ2 =0 .010 1 ,P=0 .920 1) .Conclusion Either ultrasoundgraphy or CT guided percutaneous paracentes is feasible and safe for liver abscess .Compared to CT ,the ultra-soundgraphy is more convenient and economic .
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to figure out whether volumetric gray-scale histogram difference between anterior and posterior cervix can indicate the extent of cervical consistency. METHODS: We collected data of 95 patients who were appropriate for vaginal delivery with 36th to 37th weeks of gestational age from September 2010 to October 2011 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Ansan Hospital. Patients were excluded who had one of the followings: Cesarean section, labor induction, premature rupture of membrane. Thirty-four patients were finally enrolled. The patients underwent evaluation of the cervix through Bishop score, cervical length, cervical volume, three-dimensional (3D) cervical volumetric gray-scale histogram. The interval days from the cervix evaluation to the delivery day were counted. We compared to 3D cervical volumetric gray-scale histogram, Bishop score, cervical length, cervical volume with interval days from the evaluation of the cervix to the delivery. RESULTS: Gray-scale histogram difference between anterior and posterior cervix was significantly correlated to days to delivery. Its correlation coefficient (R) was 0.500 (P = 0.003). The cervical length was significantly related to the days to delivery. The correlation coefficient (R) and P-value between them were 0.421 and 0.013. However, anterior lip histogram, posterior lip histogram, total cervical volume, Bishop score were not associated with days to delivery (P >0.05). CONCLUSION: By using gray-scale histogram difference between anterior and posterior cervix and cervical length correlated with the days to delivery. These methods can be utilized to better help predict a cervical consistency.