Résumé
Abstract Objectives The differentiation between Vestibular Migraine (VM) and Meniere's Disease (MD) is difficult because of overlapping symptoms. The study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and vestibular function test results between VM and MD patients. Methods Seventy-one patients with definite VM and 31 patients with definite unilateral MD were included. All patients received Caloric Test (CT), Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) and Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP) test within 7 days after visiting the hospital. Results of these tests were compared between groups. Results Most VM patients (64.0%) experienced spontaneous internal vertigo, while most MD patients (66.7%) experienced spontaneous external vertigo. MD patients had more severe vestibular symptoms and autonomic responses compared to VM patients during attacks (p= 0.03, p= 0.00, respectively). The nystagmus intensity of CT-induced was greater in VM patients than in MD patients (p= 0.003). More VM patients had CT intolerance and Central Positional Nystagmus (CPN) compared to MD patients (p= 0.002, p = 0.006, respectively). More MD patients had CT(+) and vHIT saccades wave compared to VM patients (p< 0.001, p= 0.002, respectively). The non-elicitation rate of cervical VEMP was higher, and the ocular VEMP amplitudes were lower in MD patients than in VM patients (p = 0.002, p= 0.018). Conclusions Vestibular symptoms during attacks combined with the results of vestibular function tests may be used to differentiate between VM and MD. The diverse nature of vestibular symptoms (especially internal vertigo), history of motion sickness and CT intolerance may provide clues to the diagnosis of VM, whereas spontaneous external vertigo, CT(+) with vHIT(-), and the presence of saccades may provide clues to the diagnosis of MD. Level of evidence: 4.
Résumé
Abstract Introduction "Dizziness" is a common complaint in clinical practice that can occur with anyone. However, since the symptom is caused by a wide range of disorders, a general clinician usually faces some difficulty to detect the cause. Objective This study aimed to formulate and validate a simple instrument that can be used to screen and predict the most likely cause of dizziness in Thai outpatients. Methods This study was divided into two phases. Phase I included 41 patients diagnosed with common causes of dizziness to determine the algorithm and construct the "structural algorithm questionnaire version 1". In addition, to test and retest its content validity and reliability until the instrument had an acceptable level of both. Phase II of the study pertained to evaluating its accuracy in clinical trials, 150 patients with dizziness had a face-to-face interview while they were waiting for their medical appointment. Results The degree of agreement between the algorithm results and clinical diagnoses was within an acceptable level (κ = 0.69). Therefore, this algorithm was used to construct the structural algorithm questionnaire version 1. The content validity of the structural algorithm questionnaire version 1 evaluated by seven experts. The content validity index values of the questionnaire ranged from 0.71 to 1.0. The Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) of intra-rater reliability of the structural algorithm questionnaire version 1 was 0.71. In clinical trials, 150 patients with dizziness had a face-to-face interview while they were waiting for their appointment. The overall agreement between their questionnaire responses and final diagnoses by specialists showed a moderate degree of clinical accuracy (κ = 0.55). Conclusions The structural algorithm questionnaire version 1 had a well-developed design and acceptable quality pertaining to both validity and reliability. It might be used to differentiate the cause of dizziness between vestibular and non-vestibular disorders, especially of outpatients with dizziness symptoms.
Resumo Introdução "Tontura' é uma queixa comum na prática clínica que pode ocorrer com qualquer pessoa. No entanto, como o sintoma pode ser causado por uma grande quantidade de distúrbios, o clínico geral normalmente enfrenta alguma dificuldade em detectar sua causa. Objetivo Formular e validar um instrumento simples que pode ser usado para rastrear e predizer a causa mais provável de tontura em pacientes ambulatoriais tailandeses. Método Este estudo foi dividido em duas fases. A fase I consistiu em determinar o algoritmo, usaram‐se 41 pacientes com diagnóstico de causa comum de tontura, depois construir o questionário de algoritmo estrutural versão 1 (structural algorithm questionnaire version 1) e testar e retestar a validade de seu conteúdo e sua confiabilidade até que o instrumento apresentasse um nível aceitável de ambos. A fase II do estudo consistiu em avaliar a precisão do instrumento em ensaios clínicos, 150 pacientes com tontura foram pessoalmente entrevistados enquanto aguardavam o atendimento médico. Resultados O grau de concordância entre os resultados do algoritmo e os diagnósticos clínicos ficou dentro de um nível aceitável (κ = 0,69). Portanto, esse algoritmo foi usado para construir o questionário de algoritmo estrutural versão 1. A validade de conteúdo do questionário foi avaliada por sete especialistas. Os valores do índice de validade de conteúdo do questionário variaram de 0,71 a 1,0. O coeficiente kappa de Cohen (κ) de confiabilidade intraexaminador foi de 0,71. Em estudos clínicos, 150 pacientes com tontura foram pessoalmente entrevistados enquanto aguardavam a consulta com o médico. A concordância geral entre as respostas ao questionário e os diagnósticos finais dos especialistas mostrou um grau moderado de acurácia clínica (κ = 0,55). Conclusões O questionário de algoritmo estrutural versão 1teve um desenho bem desenvolvido e qualidade aceitável no que diz respeito à validade e confiabilidade. Pode ser usado para diferenciar a causa da tontura entre distúrbios vestibulares e não vestibulares, especialmente em pacientes ambulatoriais com sintomas de tontura.
Résumé
Introducción: En los schwannomas vestibulares (SV), la incidencia de disfunción vestibular como principal síntoma es del 10%, sin embargo, producen un notorio impacto en la calidad de vida de los pacientes. Objetivo: Evaluar el impacto funcional que produce la exéresis de SV por via translaberintica y la rehabilitación vestibular sobre los síntomas vestibulares, en los pacientes tratados en nuestro hospital. Material y Métodos: Se realizó un análisis prospectivo de 2 pacientes con diagnóstico de SV y disfunción vestibular agregada. En ambos pacientes, se realizó la resección a través de un abordaje translaberíntico. Los pacientes fueron evaluados funcionalmente antes y después de la cirugía. El impacto de la misma sobre la calidad de vida se evalúo mediante la Escala de Discapacidad por Mareo (DHI). Todos los pacientes realizaron un plan de rehabilitación vestibular personalizado y a los 12 meses postoperatorios presentaron una mejoría clínica significativa en comparación con el preoperatorio. Discusión: Las posibles opciones de tratamiento en estos pacientes resultan limitadas. En la literatura, se ha demostrado que la laberintectomía es un tratamiento eficaz para el tratamiento de síntomas vestibulares persistentes e incapacitantes, en los pacientes sin audición funcional. La calidad de vida de los mismos es reducida, y mejoraría significativamente después de la cirugía translaberintica y de un programa personalizado de rehabilitación vestibular. Conclusión: Debido a su eficacia comprobada, el abordaje translaberíntico y la resección de la lesión, acompañado de la realización un programa de rehabilitación vestibular, como estrategia de tratamiento para estos pacientes debe ser considerado.
Introduction: The incidence of disabling vestibular symptoms in vestibular schwannoma patients has been reported at roughly 10%. Despite their relative rarity, however, such symptoms can lead to physical and social limitations and reduce patients' quality of life. Unfortunately, published evidence on possible treatment options for vestibular schwannoma patients with disabling vestibular symptoms is limited. Objective: To report the functional impact of trans-labyrinthine microsurgery and vestibular rehabilitation, performed at our hospital, in two vestibular schwannoma patients with disabling vestibular symptoms. Methods: A prospective analysis was performed of two patients with a unilateral vestibular schwannoma, without serviceable hearing in their affected ear, and severely handicapped by attacks of rotatory vertigo and constant dizziness. Trans-labyrinthine surgery, with complete tumor resection, was performed in both patients. Preoperative and postoperative quality of life was measured using Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores. Both patients also underwent a customized vestibular rehabilitation program and had a final evaluation 12 months post-operatively. Results: Relative to their preoperative evaluation, both patients experienced significant clinical improvement that persisted through 12 months of post-operative follow-up. Conclusions: Consistent with the few prior reports already published, we found that surgical removal of vestibular schwannomas by trans-labyrinthine surgery and vestibular rehabilitation was safe and effective for persistent, disabling vestibular symptoms. Postoperative vertigo and quality of life both improved significantly when microsurgery was combined with a personalized vestibular rehabilitation program. Disabling vestibular symptoms that impair quality of life in patients with vestibular schwannoma without serviceable hearing in the affected ear should be considered for trans-labyrinthine microsurgery and personalized vestibular rehabilitation.