Mobile colposcopy by trained nurses in a cervical cancer screening programme at Battor, Ghana

Objectives: Cervical precancer screening programs are difficult to establish in low resource settings partly because of a lack of human resource. Our aiming was to overcome this challenge. We hypothesized that this could be done through task shifting to trained nurses. Design: Descriptive retrospective cross-sectional review. Setting: Training was at the Cervical Cancer Prevention and Training Center (CCPTC) and screening was carried out at the clinic and at outreaches / peripheral facilities.Participants: All women who reported to the clinic for screening or were recruited during outreaches Interventions: All 4 nurses were trained for at least 2weeks (module 1). A total of 904 women were screened by the trained nurses using the EVA system. Quality assurance was ensured. Main outcome measures: Primary screening and follow-up were carried out by the trained nurses with quality assured through image sharing and meetings with peers and experienced gynaecologists. Results: 828 women had primary screening and 76 had follow-up screening. 739 (89.3%) were screened at the clinic and 89 (10.7%) at outreaches/peripheral facilities. Of all screened, 130 (14.5%) had cervical lesions, and 25 (2.8%) were treated, 12 (48.0%) by Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) performed by a gynaecologist, 11 (44.0%) with thermal coagulation by trained nurses except one, and 2 (8.0%) with cryotherapy by trained nurses. Conclusion: We demonstrate the utility of a model where nurses trained in basic colposcopy can be used to successfully implement a cervical precancer screening and treatment program in low-resource settings

Comparative evaluation of human papilloma virus-DNA test verses colposcopy as secondary cervical cancer screening test to triage screen positive women on primary screening by visual inspection with 5% Acetic acid.

INTRODUCTION: Visual inspection with 5% Acetic acid (VIA) as a low cost screening method has good sensitivity with the limitation of low specificity and low positive predictive values. The present study therefore evaluates the performance of secondary testing by human papillomavirus (HPV) test and Colposcopy in a single‑visit screening approach to increase program effectiveness in limited health‑care resources settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross‑sectional cervical cancer screening trial, 3629 women (30‑65 years) were screened by primary screening test VIA. VIA test positive women were subsequently tested for the presence of oncogenic HPV types by hybrid capture II and with colposcopy. The reference investigation histopathology was performed for all primary screen positive women. RESULTS: Data for 3613 evaluable women showed 352 (9.7%) women positive on primary screening by VIA. VIA had a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76‑0.99) and specificity of 91% (95% CI: 0.90‑0.92) respectively to detect the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ . HPV DNA and colposcopy as secondary tests to triage VIA positive women had a sensitivity of 61% (95% CI: 0.41‑0.78), 43% (95% CI: 0.24‑0.63) and specificity of 99% (95% CI: 0.99‑1.00), 99% (95% CI: 0.99‑0.99) respectively for detecting CIN2+ lesions. CONCLUSION: Two step screening model combining highly sensitive low cost test like VIA for primary screening followed by more specific HPV DNA test as triage test for primary screen positive can be a cost‑effective cervical screening strategy in resource constrained settings.