Résumé
ObjectiveTo establish the clinical comprehensive evaluation index system for Chinese patent medicine（CPM） based on Evidence and Value：Impact on DEcisionMaking（EVIDEM） framework， so as to promote the scientific， systematic and standardized implementation of clinical comprehensive evaluation of CPM. MethodThe clinical comprehensive evaluation index system was determined through literature review， semi-structured interview and Delphi method， and the weights of each index were clarified by analytic hierarchy process（AHP）. ResultThe recovery rates of both rounds of expert consultation were 100%， and the authority coefficient of experts was 0.90 and 0.905， respectively. Kendall's coordination coefficients（W） of the second- and third-level indicators in the first-round consultation were 0.320 and 0.283（P<0.001）， and in the second round were 0.411 and 0.351， respectively（P<0.001）. The finally constructed clinical comprehensive evaluation index system for CPM included 6 first-level indicators， 13 second-level indicators and 28 third-level indicators. Among the first-level indicators， the weights of effectiveness， safety， economy， innovation， suitability and accessibility were 37.34%， 32.68%， 11.85%， 5.87%， 5.79% and 6.47%， respectively. ConclusionThis study has constructed a universal clinical comprehensive evaluation index system for CPM， and the domain and criteria are introduced and interpreted in detail， which can provide reference and information for carrying out the clinical comprehensive evaluation of CPM， but it needs to be refined and improved in combination with the clinical practice of CPM for specialized diseases.
Résumé
ObjectiveTo systematically review the studies about Yiqing Capsules in the treatment of pharyngitis， tonsillitis， gingivitis， and oral ulcers with heat-toxin syndrome and clarify the advantages and therapeutic characteristics of Yiqing capsules， thus providing reference for the decision-making by relevant departments and clues for the clinical and basic research. MethodThe multi-criteria decision analysis （MCDA） model and CSC v2.0 were employed to comprehensively evaluate Yiqing capsules from multiple aspects. ResultThe serious adverse reactions in the spontaneous reporting system （SRS） monitoring data of Yiqing capsules included pruritus， rash， an ddiarrhea， all of which were relieved or cured， without aggravation or interhospital transfer for treatment. Literature data showed that the main clinical adverse reactions were abdominal pain， diarrhea， etc. Both acute toxicity and long-term toxicity tests showed good safety， and thus the safety of Yiqing capsules was rated as grade B. The results of Meta-analysis showed that Yiqing capsules used alone or in combination with other medicines outperformed Niuhuang Jiedu capsules or Western medicine in the treatment of pharyngitis， tonsillitis， gingivitis， and oral ulcers with heat toxin in terms of symptom alleviation， disappearance rate of main symptoms， and recurrence rate of aphtha. Pharmacological and pharmacodynamic studies showed that Yiqing capsules had antimicrobial， antiviral， and anti-inflammatory effects， with the effectiveness rated as grade B. The decision tree model was adopted to analyze the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. With the threshold of 1 fold per capita GDP and the disappearing rate of pain in gingivitis as the indicator， Yiqing capsules had an economic advantage in the treatment of gingivitis due to heat-toxin compared with Niuhuang Jiedu capsules， and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 0.39 yuan/%， which indicated acceptable cost， with the economy rated as grade B. Yiqing capsules can not only clear heat from Qi aspect but also purge blood fire， serving as the representative prescription of clearing and purging for heat-toxin syndrome. Considering the industrial service system and enterprise innovation， the comprehensive innovation of Yiqing capsules was rated as grade B. Generally， this product does not require personalized treatment plans and features convenient supply， storage， transportation， policy publicity， drug information standards， and easy operation for medical care and patients. The Chinese patent medicine information was complete and in line with national standards， and thus the suitability of Yiqing capsules was rated as grade A. With a low price and good availability and affordability， the accessibility of Yiqing capsules was rated as grade A. The Yiqing capsules prescription， Sanhuang Xiexin decoction， originated from ancient medical books， with rich real-world studies， and thus the traditional Chinese medicine characteristics of Yiqing capsules was rated as grade C. ConclusionThe clinical value of Yiqing capsules was rated as grade B from the "6+1" dimensions， suggesting that it could be conditionally converted into the relevant policy results of basic clinical drug management according to the procedure.
Résumé
OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical comprehensive value of 15 Chinese patent medicines for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B， in order to provide reference for clinical rational drug use. METHODS According to the Management Guidelines for Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals （2021 Version for Trial Implementation）， systematic literature review， meta-analysis and other related data analysis methods were used to perform qualitative and quantitative analysis for the safety， efficacy， economy， suitability， accessibility and innovation of 15 Chinese patent medicines. RESULTS In terms of safety， most of the adverse drug reactions of chronic hepatitis B Chinese patent medicines before the market were unobserved or unclear； post-marketing safety took nucleoside analogs as the intermediate bridge for meta-analysis， there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug reactions among the combined regimens of Chinese patent medicines （P＞0.05）， except that the combination regimen of Fuzheng huayu capsule， Compound yiganling capsules versus combination regimen of Jiuwei gantai capsules showed statistically significant differences （P＜0.05）. In terms of effectiveness， the results of network meta-analysis showed that most Chinese patent medicines， such as Fuzheng huayu capsules combined regimens， had no significant differences in effective rate， HBeAg negative conversion rate and HBV-DNA negative conversion rate （P＞0.05）； however， in reducing the liver elastic hardness value， the combined regimen of Dangfei liganning tablet （capsule） was better than the other combined regimens （P＜0.05）. In terms of economy， the highest cost was the Shuganning injection， and the lowest was Hepatitis B qingre jiedu granules. In terms of suitability， most of the medicines were capsules， tablets and granules， which only needed to be sealed to store and taken orally or taken with boiling water. Compared with injections and some similar products that required strict control of storage temperature， its suitability was better. In terms of accessibility， from the perspective of drug price and affordability， Shuganning injection had the highest average daily cost， the number of days that needed to be borne by the average daily wage was the highest； the average daily cost of Compound yiganling tablets was the lowest， and the number of days required to be borne by the average daily wage was the lowest. From the perspective of availability， Compound biejia ruangan tablets， Dangfei liganning capsules and Wuzhi granules were easier to obtain. In terms of innovation， the 15 Chinese patent medicines included in the study were all domestically produced medicines with a relatively long-term theoretical basis of traditional Chinese medicine and experience in human medicine， and had good industrial innovation. Among them， Compound huayu tablets （capsules） and Anluo huaxian pills were protected varieties of traditional Chinese medicine； Fuzheng huayu tablets （capsules） with more patents had 6 valid patents， all of which were patents for invention. CONCLUSIONS Wuzhi capsule， Sedum sarmentosum granules， Compound yiganling tablets， Rhubarb buchong pills and Dangfei liganning capsules have high clinical comprehensive value.
Résumé
ObjectiveTo clarify the development and methodological research status of clinical comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicines in China and identify the problems and difficulties in the evaluation， so as to provide a reference for promoting the subsequent evaluation. MethodFirstly， we analyzed the current situation of clinical comprehensive evaluation in China by reviewing the articles about the process of clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs and the process of clinical comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicines. Secondly， we comprehensively summarized the formulation background and key points of policies related to clinical comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicines and then show the development status in this field at the national and provincial levels. ResultThe comprehensive clinical evaluation of Chinese patent medicines is still in its infancy in China， and 32 articles of specific evaluation of Chinese patent medicines were included in the study. The dosage forms were mainly capsules （15 articles， 46.88%） and injections （28.13%）. The evaluation mainly involved diseases such as the nervous system （10 articles， 31.25%）， digestive system （5 articles， 15.63%）， and respiratory system （5 articles， 15.63%）. The research results of clinical comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicines were mainly from relevant societies and research institutions. Different research teams have developed technical guidelines or specifications for the evaluation， while the government-leading evaluation guidelines remained to be formulated at the national and provincial levels. In addition， the research articles in this field mainly concentrated on the application of evaluation methods， the building of evaluation index systems， and completed evaluation reports. ConclusionTo reflect the unique value and advantages of Chinese patent medicines， the government needs to build technical guidelines for the clinical comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicines on the basis of the clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs and create a favorable policy environment for the evaluation work.
Résumé
According to the Guidelines for clinical comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicine(2022 version), this study comprehensively compared the clinical value of Jinsang Liyan Pills/Capsules with that of another commonly used Chinese patent medicine(drug A).(1)Effectiveness: Jinsang Liyan Pills/Capsules had antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and pain-relieving effects and can improve the total response rate in the treatment of chronic pharyngitis. Moreover, they took effect faster than the control group.(2)Safety: Jinsang Liyan Pills/Capsules did not cause acute toxicity and long-term toxicity, with low incidence of adverse reactions, which were mild and alleviated after drug withdrawal. Therefore, the risk of Jinsang Liyan Pills/Capsules was under control.(3)Economy: Jinsang Liyan Pills/Capsules had lower cost per course of treatment than drug A. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER) of Jinsang Liyan Pills combined with Jinsang Qingyin Pills was-39.97 yuan compared with conventional treatment. The ICER of Jinsang Liyan Pills compared with amoxicilin was 0.01 yuan. The results meant that Jinsang Liyan Pills/Capsules had a cost-effectiveness advantage.(4)Innovation: Jinsang Liyan Pills/Capsules had reasonably formula and wide indications, meeting the clinical needs. Moreover, they had been authorized four patents of advanced manufacturing technology.(5)Suitability: the storage and administration of Jinsang Liyan Pills/Capsules were convenient, with clear instruction of medication.(6) Accessibility: Jinsang Liyan Pills/Capsules had sufficient drug reserve, caused low economic burden of patients, and presented environmental bearing capacity. Finally, Jinsang Liyan Pills/Capsules were scored 79.10 points, and drug A 67.93 points. The experts reached the consensus of grade A for Jinsang Liyan Pills/Capsules, which can be directly converted into decision making. The result of this comprehensive evaluation of Jinsang Liyan Pills/Capsules highlight the clinical advantages in the treatment of chronic pharyngitis and lay a foundation for the standardized research on the clinical basic research of the drug in the future.
Sujets)
Humains , Médicaments issus de plantes chinoises/usage thérapeutique , Pharyngite/traitement médicamenteux , Médecine traditionnelle d'Asie orientale , Médicaments sans ordonnance/usage thérapeutique , CapsulesRésumé
This study used health technology assessment methods and multi-criteria decision analysis(MCDA) model, according to the guideline for clinical comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicine, we developed this assessment tool. The comprehensive evaluation score of Jinsang Sanjie Pills/Capsules is calculated based on the additive model. This score is calculated by "quantitative evaluation software v1.0 for clinical comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicines" which developed by the project team. The evaluation yielded the following results.(1)Effectiveness: compared with the control group, Jinsang Sanjie Pills/Capsules can improve the total effectiveness rate of vocal nodule/polyp of vocal cord, and improve the symptoms and signs.(2)Safety: Jinsang Sanjie Pills/Capsules did not show acute toxicity and long-term toxicity. The most common adverse reaction was gastrointestinal system damage, all of the adverse reactions were either improved or cured.(3)Economy: from the perspective of the health system, evaluating the single use or combination of Jinsang Sanjie Pills/Capsules with conventional medication in the treatment of vocal nodule/polyp of vocal cord is relatively effective and cost-effective compared to conventional medication, with a stable cost-effectiveness advantage.(4) Innovation: Jinsang Sanjie Pills/Capsules are used for the treatment of slow throat paralysis(vocal nodules, polyp of vocal cord, thickening of vocal mucosa) caused by heat toxin accumulation, Qi stagnation and blood stasis, and the resulting hoarseness. Jinsang Sanjie Pills/Capsules have good innovation and targeted indications.(5) Suitability: the investigated doctors, pharmacists and patients all believed that Jinsang Sanjie Pills/Capsules have good suitability.(6)Accessibility: Jinsang Sanjie Pills/Capsules are included in the category B of the National Basic Medical Insurance, Work Injury Insurance, and Maternity Insurance Drug Catalogue(2021 edition), which have good cost-effectiveness and affordability for medical insurance and self-paid patients. Jinsang Sanjie Pills/Capsules do not contain endangered animals and plants. The supply of raw materials can meet the demand of production at present. The comprehensive evaluation score is 76.06 points. Based on all dimensions of evidence, 71.4% experts consensus on Jinsang Sanjie Pills/Capsules is class A, which can be directly converted into decision making. This study comprehensively evaluated the clinical application value of Jinsang Sanjie Pills/Capsules in the treatment of vocal nodule/polyp of vocal cord, so as to provide evidence for their rational clinical use and regulatory decision-making.
Sujets)
Grossesse , Humains , Femelle , Médicaments issus de plantes chinoises/usage thérapeutique , Plis vocaux , Capsules , Médecine traditionnelle d'Asie orientale , Médicaments sans ordonnance/usage thérapeutique , Médecine traditionnelle chinoiseRésumé
This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of Ruyi Zhenbao Pills in the treatment of osteoarthritis, aiming to clarify its clinical advantages and promote rational drug use and related policy transformation. Following the relevant standards in Guidelines for the Comprehensive Evaluation of Drugs in Clinical Practice and Technical Specifications for the Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation of Chinese Patent Medicine, comprehensive research and related data on Ruyi Zhenbao Pills in the treatment of osteoarthritis were collected in the dimensions of safety, effectiveness, economy, innovation, suitability, accessibility, and traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) cha-racteristics(referred to as the "6+1" dimensions). Through evidence-based medicine, questionnaire surveys, health technology assessment, pharmacoeconomic evaluation, and other methods, a multi-criteria decision analysis(MCDA) model and CSC v2.0 software were used to comprehensively evaluate the clinical value of Ruyi Zhenbao Pills. Spontaneous reporting system data on adverse reactions and literature data indicate that the adverse reactions of Ruyi Zhenbao Pills are mostly general adverse reactions, with no reports of se-rious adverse reactions. The known risks are small, and its safety is rated as class A. It has been shown to effectively relieve joint pain and restore joint function in the treatment of osteoarthritis. However, more high-quality, large-sample randomized controlled trials are needed to further validate its effectiveness, which is rated as class B. There is evidence supporting its economic viability, and its economic is rated as class B. It demonstrates good clinical innovation, innovative enterprise service system, and industrial innovation, and innovation is rated as class A. Medical professionals and patients have a favorable perception of the suitability of Ruyi Zhenbao Pills, and further improvement can be made in terms of convenience of administration and promotion to facilitate rational drug use by healthcare professionals and patients. Suitability is rated as class B. The drug has a favorable price level, availability, and affordability, and accessibility is rated as class A. Ruyi Zhenbao Pills are a classic Tibetan medicinal prescription with excellent TCM theoretical characteristics. However, further research is needed on its use in human studies. TCM characteristics are rated as class B. Based on the evaluation results of the "6+1" dimensions, the comprehensive clinical evaluation is rated as grade B. Ruyi Zhenbao Pills have good clinical value in the treatment of osteoarthritis, and it is recommended to undergo the necessary procedures for conditional transformation into a policy for the management of essential clinical drugs.
Sujets)
Humains , Médecine traditionnelle chinoise , Normes de référence , Médicaments sans ordonnance , Médicaments essentiels , Arthrose/traitement médicamenteux , Médicaments issus de plantes chinoises/effets indésirablesRésumé
OBJECTIVE To explore standardized evaluation process for clinical comprehensive evaluation of blood lipid- regulating drugs and perform rapid assessment of clinical comprehensive evaluation of blood lipid-regulating drugs with different mechanisms so as to provide reference for the drug catalogue selection and rational drug use of medical institutions. METHODS Referring to guidelines and consensus such as the guideline for the management of comprehensive clinical evaluation of drugs， the methods such as literature research， expert interviews， and Delphi expert consultation were used to establish a multi-dimensional and multi-criteria clinical comprehensive evaluation index system and quantitative scoring table for blood lipid-regulating drugs around the two main lines of technical evaluation and policy evaluation. Then 13 blood lipid-regulating drugs with different mechanisms in 21 third-grade class-A medical institutions from five provinces and regions of Northwest China were scored from both technical and policy dimensions to form a comprehensive evaluation result. RESULTS The clinical comprehensive evaluation index system and corresponding rapid evaluation quantitative scoring table were constructed for blood lipid-regulating drugs in the five northwest provinces and regions. The technicalevaluation section included 6 primary indicators， 13 secondary indicators， and 34 tertiary indicators， totaling 110 points. The policy evaluation section included 4 primary indicators and 6 secondary indicators， with a total score of 40 points （30 points for some drugs） and a total score of 150 points （or 140 points）. The scoring results showed that the highest score was atorvastatin， followed by rosuvastatin and simvastatin. CONCLUSIONS Statins are still the cornerstone of drug therapy for patients with dyslipidemia； the rapid evaluation quantitative scoring table constructed in this study is comprehensive， systematic and operable. The evaluation process in this study can provide empirical references for other groups to exploring the standardized path and quality control mechanism of clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs.
Résumé
The articles involving Xiangju Capsules were retrieved, and qualitative research and quantitative research methods were combined to evaluate the evidence of the safety, effectiveness, economy, innovation, suitability, accessibility, and characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine( "6+1" dimensions) of this drug. Multi-criteria decision analysis(MCDA) model and CSC v2.0 software were used to comprehensively evaluate the clinical value of Xiangju Capsules in the treatment of rhinosinusitis and clarify the precise clinical positioning. The dimensions are graded A, B, C, or D. Multi-source safety evidence showed that the main adverse reactions were gastrointestinal reactions, rash, itching, dizziness, and headache. Based on the available studies, the risk is controllable and the safety is grade A. Meta-analysis showed that Xiangju Capsules + conventional western medicine could recover the Lund-Kennedy score, Lund-Mackay score, and CT score, relieve headache, nasal congestion, olfactory disturbance, and facial pain, with the effectiveness is grade B. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Xiangju Capsules + conventional western medicine compared with conventional western medicine alone in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis was 263.71 yuan, about 0.82% of the per capita disposable income. The results of sensitivity analysis showed that the research results were relatively robust. Based on the assumption that the per capita disposable income in 2020 will be the threshold of patients' willingness to pay, it is more economical to use Xiangju Capsules + conventional western medicine. The drug belongs to grade A of the national medical insurance, with an average daily cost of 3.06 yuan, and the economy is grade B. This formula is modified from classic formulas and characteristic empirical formulas, be capable of improving immunity and preventing repeated attacks. It can be used for acute and chronic rhinitis-rhinosinusitis. It had a wide range of applicability, especially for the patients with head and face tenderness. Service innovation was reflected in the measures to guarantee supply, capacity, scalability, and coverage of grass-roots sales channels. The industrial innovation was improved through the management of medicinal resources, pharmaceutical industry, production technology, quality control, scientific research and development, and this formula won three national invention patents. Comprehensively, the innovation of Xiangju Capsules is grade B. According to the survey of 188 medical practitioners and 196 patients in 20 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions of China, the drug was characterized by easy preparation and administration, individualized medication, simple technology and management, convenient use, storage, and transport, and controllable adverse reactions, with the suitability is grade B. Xiangju Capsules showed the cost of 45.9 and 275.4 yuan for treatment of acute and chronic rhinitis-rhinosinusitis, respectively, being well affordable. It was sold in 35 000 medical institutions in China. The dosage form was suitable for transportation, storage, and grass-root application. With rich, sustainable, and available medicinal resources, the accessibility of Xiangju Capsules is grade A. This drug can be used for both acute and chronic rhinitis-rhinosinusitis, clearing heat and expelling pus, and strengthening the exterior to prevent relapse. After this drug was available on the market, over 4 000 cases were studied, with rich experience in human use accumulated, and characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine is grade B. Overall, the clinical value of Xiangju Capsules is class B. It is suggested that Xiangju Capsules should be used in accordance with the relevant policies of basic clinical drug administration to play its role.
Sujets)
Humains , Rhinite/traitement médicamenteux , Sinusite/traitement médicamenteux , Médecine traditionnelle chinoise , Céphalée , Chine , CapsulesRésumé
ObjectiveTo carry out the clinical comprehensive evaluation of Biantong capsules and Biantong tablets in the treatment of constipation guided by the clinical value of drugs， and to provide a scientific basis for the rational pricing， rational use， and cataloging of Biantong capsules/tablets. MethodThe available evidence and survey data were used for the clinical comprehensive evaluation of Biantong capsules/tablets and three control drugs in the treatment of constipation in terms of the six dimensions including effectiveness， safety， economics， innovation， suitability， and accessibility. ResultIn terms of effectiveness， Biantong capsules/tablets can improve the response rate， with clear pharmacological mechanism. In terms of safety， the absence of toxic reaction， the mild adverse reactions， and the favorable prognosis indicate high safety. In terms of economics， the average daily cost of Biantong capsules/tablets is the lowest among the tested drugs， which indicates a cost-effectiveness advantage. In terms of innovation， Biantong capsules/tablets have been authorized patents in China and listed as members in the third category of new drugs of traditional Chinese medicine/ninth new drugs of traditional Chinese medicine. In terms of suitability， Biantong capsules/tablets are convenient to store and take and have good suitability in terms of drug technical characteristics and drug usage. In terms of accessibility， Biantong capsules/tablets have a wide coverage in hospitals， sufficient capacity， low patient burden， extensive drug catalogue coverage， and no major environmental risk for long-term application. The comprehensive values of the tested drugs follow a descending order of control drug B （84.27 score）， Biantong capsules/tablets （82.47 score）， control drug A （70.47 score）， and control drug C （59.46 score）. The recommendations of the expert panel are Class A （18/18）， which can be directly converted into decision-making. ConclusionBiantong capsules/tablets demonstrate a high clinical comprehensive value in the treatment of constipation， providing a reference for the rational pricing， rational use， and cataloging of drugs.
Résumé
Objective To analyze the research status and predict the development trend of clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs in China, and to provide reference for clinical comprehensive evaluation. Methods CNKI, Wanfang and VIP database were used to search the published articles of clinical comprehensive evaluation. Literature searching was set from the building time of the database to 2022, the basic information about the published articles was obtained for the evaluation of the literature quality. Bibliometrics and CiteSpace 6.1.R3 software were used to visualize the research authors, research institutions, and key words. Results After data screening, a total of 126 Chinese published articles were selected. The analysis showed that the numbers of published articles were rising continuously, and China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences and Xie Yanming were the institute and the author with the maximum number of literatures, respectively. Conclusion The clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs was conducted based on the clinical value of drugs, guided by the policy requirements. It is suggested that researchers should conduct the comprehensive evaluation according to the focus and requirements of government agencies, the pharmaceutical industry and the clinical applications.
Résumé
Objective: To analyze the safety, effectiveness, economics, innovation, suitability and accessibility of tetrandrine in the treatment of pneumoconiosis, and provide evidence-based basis for health policy decision-making and clinical practice. Methods: In July 2022, the system searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, SinoMed databases (the retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to June 30, 2022), screened the documents that meet the standards, extracted and evaluated the data, and used the "HTA checklist" developed by the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) to evaluate the HTA report. AMSTAR-2 Scale was used to evaluate the quality of systematic evaluation/Meta analysis. CHEERS Scale was used to evaluate the quality of pharmacoeconomics research. The included cohort study or case-control study was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The included randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were evaluated using the Cochrane Risk Bias Assessment Tool (Cochrane RCT) quality evaluation criteria. Comprehensive comparison and analysis based on the characteristics of the data included in the study. Results: A total of 882 related literatures were detected from the initial screening. According to relevant standards, 8 RCT studies were finally selected for analysis. Statistical results showed that basic treatment with tetrandrine could better improve FEV(1) (MD=0.13, 95%CI: 0.06-0.20, P<0.001), FEV(1)/FVC (MD=4.48, 95%CI: 0.61-8.35, P=0.02) and clinical treatment efficiency. Tetrandrine had a low incidence of adverse reactions. The affordability coefficient of tetrandrine tablets was 0.295-0.492. Conclusion: Tetrandrine can improve the clinical symptoms and pulmonary ventilation function of pneumoconiosis patients, most of the adverse reactions are mild, and the clinical application is safe.
Sujets)
Humains , Pneumoconiose/traitement médicamenteux , Benzylisoquinoléines/usage thérapeutique , Médicaments issus de plantes chinoises , Études cas-témoinsRésumé
Currently,the research or publications related to the clinical comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicine are increasing,which attracts the broad attention of all circles. According to the completed clinical evaluation report on Chinese patent medicine,there are still practical problems and technical difficulties such as unclear responsibility of the evaluation organization,unclear evaluation subject,miscellaneous evaluation objects,and incomplete and nonstandard evaluation process. In terms of evaluation standards and specifications,there are different types of specifications or guidelines with different emphases issued by different academic groups or relevant institutions. The professional guideline is required to guide the standardized and efficient clinical comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicine and further improve the authority and quality of evaluation. In combination with the characteristics of Chinese patent medicine and the latest research achievement at home and abroad,the detailed specifications were formulated from six aspects including design,theme selection,content and index,outcome,application and appraisal,and quality control. The guideline was developed based on the guideline development requirements of China Assoication of Chinese medicine. After several rounds of expert consensus and public consultation,the current version of the guideline has been developed.
Sujets)
Médecine traditionnelle chinoise , Médicaments sans ordonnance , Consensus , Chine , Normes de référence , Médicaments issus de plantes chinoisesRésumé
ObjectiveTo comprehensively evaluate the clinical application value of four types of Jinsang Kaiyin preparation（JSKYs） and the other two Chinese patent medicines（CPMs） in the treatment of acute pharyngitis/laryngitis，so as to provide evidence for their rational clinical use and regulatory decision-making. MethodAccording to the guideline for clinical comprehensive evaluation of CPM，the effectiveness，safety，economy，innovation，suitability and accessibility of four JSKYs and the other two CPM in the treatment of acute pharyngitis/laryngitis were comprehensively evaluated，which were ranked based on the quantitative scoring tool. Result① Effectiveness：Compared with the control group，JSKYs can improve the total effectiveness rate of acute pharyngitis/laryngitis and improve the symptoms. Network meta-analysis showed that the probability of JSKY ranked the first in terms of total effectiveness rate.② Safety：JSKYs did not show acute toxicity and long-term toxicity. The main adverse reactions were skin rash，abdominal pain，diarrhea，nausea and vomiting，etc，which were similar with the other two CPM.③ Economy：For patients with acute laryngitis（wind heat syndrome），compared with drug A，JinsangKaiyin capsule has the comparable cost-effectiveness. For patients with acute pharyngitis（wind heat syndrome），compared with drug B，JinsangKaiyin capsul has low cost and better effectiveness.④ Innovation：Compared with the other two CPM，the indications of JSKYs have their own unique population. JSKYs have six patent approval certifications and has been approved for sale in the Philippines.⑤ Suitability：Compared with the other two CPM，the investigated doctors，pharmacists and patients all believed that the instruction of JSKY was clearer and easier to understand，the use and storage conditions were more convenient，etc.⑥ Accessibility：JSKYs are included in the category B of the National Basic Medical Insurance（2022 edition），which has good cost-effectiveness and affordability for medical insurance and self paid patients. JSKYs do not contain endangered animals and plants. The supply of raw materials can meet the demand of production at present. ConclusionAs for the drug value calculation，JSKY obtained the highest score. Based on all dimensions of evidence，expert consensus on JSKY is class A，which can be directly converted into decision making.
Résumé
OBJECTIVE To construct a comprehensive evaluation index system for anti-lung cancer drugs， and to provide a basis for drug selection and rational clinical use. METHODS Based on the Guidelines for the Management of Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation of Drugs （2021 edition for trial use）， a preliminary evaluation index system framework and an index preselection pool were initially formulated through literature analysis. The evaluation indices were then selected and modified by using the Delphi method. The weights of each index were determined through expert scoring and relevant calculations， thereby establishing a comprehensive evaluation index system for anti-lung cancer drugs. Referred to Quick Guideline for Drug Evaluation and Selection in Chinese Medical Institutions， scoring detailed rules for clinical comprehensive evaluation indexes of anti-lung cancer drugs were formulated. The constructed comprehensive evaluation index system and scoring detailed rules were applied to conduct empirical evaluation of the anti-lung cancer drug pembrolizumab. RESULTS The constructed comprehensive evaluation index system for anti-lung cancer drugs included 6 primary indicators and 15 secondary indicators. The weights of the primary indicators were as follows： safety （18）， efficacy （38）， economy （15）， innovation （9）， suitability （10）， and accessibility （10）. The scoring detailed rules for the comprehensive evaluation index system for anti-lung cancer drugs had been preliminarily established. The results of empirical evaluation showed that the comprehensive evaluation score （61 points） of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy regimen was higher than that of the monotherapy chemotherapy regimen （56 points）. The former demonstrated superior efficacy， innovation and suitability compared to the latter， while the latter exhibited better safety and economy. CONCLUSIONS The constructed comprehensive evaluation index system for anti-lung cancer drugs has the potential for generalizability and practical application， providing a reference basis for rational clinical drug use.
Résumé
OBJECTIVE To construct the drug clinical comprehensive evaluation index system and quantitative grading in China， and to provide a reference for scientifically carrying out comprehensive clinical evaluation of drugs. METHODS The analytic hierarchy model was used to establish the drug clinical comprehensive evaluation index system， the weight of the evaluation index and the quantitative grading of each index were determined through expert consultation and model calculation. RESULTS The results of expert consultation were integrated by using the analytic hierarchy model， and the drug clinical comprehensive evaluation index system was obtained： including six first-level indicators of effectiveness， safety， economy， suitability， accessibility and innovation， as well as twenty-three second-level indicators of recommended status， medication for special populations， and drug treatment costs； the weight of each indicator was calculated through estimation-matrix method. CONCLUSIONS The analytic hierarchy model can construct the drug clinical comprehensive evaluation index system and quantitative grading in China， which can provide methodological references for comprehensive analysis and decision-making， thus making the clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs completer and more scientific.
Résumé
OBJECTIVE To eva luate the clinical comprehensive value of desloratadine in the treatment of urticaria. METHODS The clinical comprehensive evaluation index system based on six dimensions such as safety ，effectiveness，economy，suitability， innovation and accessibility were preliminarily determined by using the methods of literature investigation and expert investigation ； the core contents of the evaluation index system were evaluated and screened by Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process ；the importance of the index was assigned by Likert 5-level scoring method ；the evidence from various sources were collected and qualitative and quantitative integration analysis were conducted according to the clinical comprehensive evaluation index system with the help of system evaluation ，drug instructions ，expert guidelines/consensus ，adverse drug reaction monitoring report ，etc； the experts scored its clinical comprehensive value according to the clinical comprehensive evaluation evidence of each dimension of desloratadine ，combined with the weight of the clinical comprehensive evaluation index system ，the clinical comprehensive evaluation score of the tertiary indexes of desloratadine were calculated. The total clinical comprehensive evaluation score was obtained by accumulating the scores of each index ，and compared with loratadine. RESULTS This study successfully constructed the clinical comprehensive evaluation index system of desloratadine in the treatment of urticaria ，including 6 primary indexes ，13 secondary indexes and 30 tertiary indexes. The total clinical comprehensive evaluation score of desloratadine was 93.63 and that of loratadine was 70.91. CONCLUSIONS The clinical comprehensive value of desloratadine is higher than that of loratadine ，which can provide a reference basis for clinical rational drug use in medical institutions ，selection of drug use catalogue and improvement of national drug policy.
Résumé
OBJEC TIVE To provide reference for clinical comprehensive evaluation of pediatric drugs in China. METHODS Taking pediatric anti-allergic drugs as an example ，the clinical comprehensive evaluation methods of pediatric drugs in medical institutions were explored from the aspects of theme selection ，evaluation content and dimension ，evaluation index ，evaluation method and evaluation result report. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS During the clinical comprehensive evaluation of pediatric drugs，under the guidance of relevant national guidelines for clinical comprehensive evaluation ，the evaluation topics could be selected according to the three principles of importance ，relevance and evaluability ，and then an appropriate evaluation index system could be developed around the six dimensions of safety ， effectiveness， economy， suitability，accessibility and innovativeness；qualitative and quantitative data integration analysis of the drugs to be evaluated were performed. In the evaluation ， it is necessary to focus on children ’s clinical basic drug use practice and decision-making needs ，normatively，scientifically and reasonably define the core index set and standard data set required by different dimensions of evidence ，standardize the collection and use of real-world data ，and effectively combine other types of evidence to truly play its advantageous role in the clinical comprehensive evaluation of pediatric drugs in China.
Résumé
Evidence and value：impact on DEcisionMaking （EVIDEM） framework was developed by EVIDEM collaboration. Its core is the combination of multiple criteria decision analysis （MCDA） model and standardized health technology assessment （HTA） report， which aims to evaluate the overall value of medical interventions. It has been tested and implemented in the real-world evaluation environments. After more than 10 years of development， EVIDEM framework has been updated to version 10， and the relevant operation manuals have been published. More than 40 countries have joined the collaboration and more than 20 countries have carried out relevant studies. The framework is constructed with patients， population and sustainability as the overall goals， combing the evidence and value， forming a relatively complete decision-making framework system composed of 2 levels， 7 dimensions and 20 criteria. The two levels include normative universal criteria and contextual criteria. The normative universal criteria， namely EVIDEM core model， is the quantitative evaluation， consisting of 5 dimensions and 13 criteria. Contextual criteria， namely contextual tools， are qualitative evaluation， consisting of 2 dimensions and 7 criteria. The specific operation steps of EVIDEM framework include selecting and constructing criteria， assigning weights， integrating and evaluating evidence， quantitative and qualitative evaluation of value， comprehensive value estimation and ranking based on value estimation. EVIDEM framework is applicable to disease diagnosis， treatment， management and other fields. Its application scope includes medical insurance reimbursement， clinical practice decision-making， drug selection and so on， which can provide a method for more systematic， transparent and scientific healthcare decision-making. At present， the framework has been introduced into the field of traditional Chinese medicine and can provide a scientific and feasible evaluation tool and methodology system for the clinical comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicine.
Résumé
Traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） health technology assessment （HTA） provides scientific information and decision-making basis for decision-makers at all levels to choose TCM health technology reasonably. However， it is still in its infancy. In the future， it is necessary to strengthen top-level design， improve cognition and attention， enhance talent training and cooperation， and speed up the development of evaluation criteria in line with the characteristics of TCM， so as to promote the development of HTA in TCM. Therefore， it is imperative to create a method system and tools suitable for TCM HTA. Evidence and value impact on decisionmaking （EVIDEM） framework is developed by EVIDEM collaboration. It combines evidence and value to form a relatively complete decision-making framework system， which can provide methodological support for medical insurance reimbursement， clinical practice decision-making， drug selection and so on. The introduction of EVIDEM framework into the field of TCM has methodological feasibility and practical operability， but it is still necessary to further integrate and optimize the TCM characteristics. On the basis of theoretical research， pilot studies are carried out with Chinese patent medicine as the breakthrough point， forming a preliminary framework and implementation path for the research of TCM HTA， in order to promote healthcare decision-making and achievement transformation.