Clinical and patient reported outcomes of Vitamin E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene liner versus moderately cross linked polyethylene liner in total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

Introduction@#In the modern era of Medicine, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is found to last longer than ever before due to the fact that there has been improved bearing surfaces and materials available. Despite these modern approaches, failure caused by polyethylene wear, aseptic loosening, instability and mispositioning and even infection could affect THA survival. In the course of addressing anti-wear characteristics of the conventional polyethylene surface various approaches have been made. To date, there are very limited studies done in which polyethylene liner is better.@*General Objective@#To compare the effects of vitamin E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene liner versus moderately cross-linked polyethylene liner in THA. @*Methodology@#Meta-analysis research design was used in this study. The primary investigators conducted a comprehensive literature search from Medline, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Elsevier, Google Scholar, Embase and ClinicalTrial.gov as electronic database. All randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of vitamin E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene liner versus moderately cross-linked polyethylene liner in THA were included in the review. @*Conclusions@#The investigation disclosed no statistical significance between moderately cross-linked polyethylene liner and vitamin E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene liner in terms of migration, head penetration and wear on mediolateral, longitudinal and anteroposterior axes after 2 and 5 years of undergoing THA. Moreover, the data pertaining to patient reported outcomes and clinical outcomes measure also indicated no statistical significance between moderately cross-linked polyethylene liner and vitamin E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene liner. This indicates that vitamin E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene liner is comparable with the conventional moderately cross-linked polyethylene liner. Vitamin E-infused highly cross-linked polyethylene ( VEPE) showed an almost similar stability with regard to the wear rates and the component showed similar stability with that of moderately cross-linked polyethylene liner.

Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Ceramic Femoral Head on Cross-Linked Ultra-High-Molecular Weight Polyethylene Liner in Patients Older than 65 Years: Minimum Five-Year Follow-Up Results / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of ceramic-on-polyethylene articular bearing surface when cementless total hip arthroplasty is performed in patients older than 65 years through an analysis of the minimum five-year follow-up results using the ceramic femoral head and cross-linked polyethylene liner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2010 to September 2012, 51 patients (56 hips) who were older than 65 years were enrolled in this retrospective study. The mean age at surgery was 70.9±5.1 years old. A clinical assessment was analyzed using the Harris hip score. For the radiographic assessment, the cup inclination and anteversion, stem alignment, and wear amount were measured. The postoperative complications were also determined. RESULTS: The mean Harris hip score was improved from preoperative 48 points to postoperative 87 points (p < 0.05). The mean cup inclination was 40.9°±6.4° and the mean cup anteversion was 20.3°±8.1°. The mean cup anteversion of the elevated liner-used group (16 cases) was 14.3°±7.9° and the mean cup anteversion of the neutral liner used group (40 cases) was 22.4°±9.1° (p < 0.05). The mean stem alignment angle was 0° (range, varus 4°–valgus 4°). The mean linear wear amount was 0.458±0.041 mm and the average annual linear wear rate was 0.079±0.032 mm/yr. Six cases (10.7%) of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures were encountered. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, the use of a ceramic-on-polyethylene articular bearing surface in elderly patients with cementless total hip arthroplasty is beneficial. On the other hand, careful effort is needed to prevent intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures.