Parâmetros farmacocinéticos, farmacodinâmicos e toxicidade da hidroxicloroquina: uma revisão / Parameters pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and toxicity of hydroxychloroquine: a review

Objetivo: verificar a toxicidade do uso medicamentoso da hidroxicloroquina em pacientes. Metodologia: trata-se de uma revisão integrativa de literatura com uma avaliação documental e abordagem descritiva nas bases de dados eletrônicos LILACS, SCIELO e MEDLINE-PUBMED, usando diferentes combinações de descritores, publicados entre os anos de 2015 a 2023, nos idiomas inglês, espanhol e português. Resultados: este estudo revisou 117 artigos científicos, dos quais 67 foram nos Estados Unidos. Além disso, o ano de 2020 obteve 21,2% a mais de publicações em relação ao ano de 2015. Desse modo, notou-se que a prevalência de 44,07% das lesões pelo uso da hidroxicloroquina foi oftálmica, 35,5% foram cardíacas, 14,4%, dermatológicas e as outras demais porcentagens restantes. Conclusão: portanto, os resultados obtidos confirmam a toxicidade da hidroxicloroquina no uso de tratamentos adjacentes.

Introduction: Tto verify the toxicity of the use of hydroxychloroquine medications in patients. Methods: it is an integrative literature review with a documentary evaluation and descriptive approach conducted in the electronic databases LILACS, SCIELO, and MEDLINE-PUBMED, using different combinations of descriptors, published between 2015 and 2023 in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. Results: this study reviewed 117 scientific articles, with 67 of them conducted in the United States. Besides that, 2020 had a 21.2% increase in publications compared to 2015. It was observed that 44.07% of the injuries caused by hydroxychloroquine use were ophthalmic, 35.5% were cardiac, 14.4% were dermatological, and the remaining percentages accounted for other types of injuries. Conclusion: therefore, the obtained results confirm the toxicity of hydroxychloroquine in the use of adjacent treatments.

Need for standardization and compliance to treatment protocols for COVID-19 within the African Region of the World Health Organization

COVID-19 pandemic changed the face of global health and brought about new issues in global health security and economy. The World Health Organization published guidelines for clinical management of COVID-19 four months after declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic. Scholarly reviews and studies from member states within WHO AFRO reveals significant deviation from the WHO published protocols on COVID-19. Assessment of national treatment protocols of 30 of 47 WHO AFRO member states showed widespread inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents for patients, which may worsen the global and concerning threat of antimicrobial resistance. There is need for adopting interventions that optimize antimicrobial use in the context of pre- and post-pandemic preparedness to ensure long-term effectiveness and sustainability for antimicrobials. Treatment guidelines are to be adopted or adapted depending on best clinical evidence available. Non-compliance with guidelines might lead to mismanagement of infectious diseases with attendant negative consequences including antimicrobial resistance and misdirection of critical resources and supplies amongst others.

La pandémie de COVID-19 a changé le visage de la santé mondiale et a soulevé de nouveaux problèmes en matière de sécurité sanitaire et d'économie mondiale. L'Organisation mondiale de la santé a publié des lignes directrices pour la gestion clinique du COVID-19 quatre mois après la déclaration du COVID-19 comme pandémie. Les revues scientifiques et les études des États membres de l'OMS AFRO révèlent un écart significatif par rapport aux protocoles publiés par l'OMS sur le COVID-19. L'évaluation des protocoles nationaux de traitement de 30 des 47 États membres de l'OMS AFRO a révélé une utilisation inappropriée et généralisée d'agents antimicrobiens chez les patients, ce qui pourrait aggraver la menace mondiale et préoccupante de résistance aux antimicrobiens. Il est nécessaire d'adopter des interventions qui optimisent l'utilisation des antimicrobiens dans le contexte de la préparation pré et post-pandémique afin de garantir l'efficacité et la durabilité à long terme des antimicrobiens. Les directives thérapeutiques doivent être adoptées ou adaptées en fonction des meilleures preuves cliniques disponibles. Le non-respect des directives pourrait conduire à une mauvaise gestion des maladies infectieuses avec des conséquences négatives qui en découlent, notamment la résistance aux antimicrobiens et une mauvaise orientation des ressources et fournitures essentielles, entre autres.

Análise das prescrições de pacientes com covid-19 em uso de hidroxicloroquina em uma unidade de terapia intensiva / Analysis of prescriptions of patients with COVID-19 using hydroxychloroquine in an Intensive Care Unit / Análisis de las prescripciones de pacientes con COVID-19 en uso hidroxicloroquina en una unidad de terapia intensiva

Mesmo em emergências sanitárias, quando terapias experimentais são empregadas, é importante prezar pela segurança e eficácia no uso de medicamentos, e a análise de prescrições médicas é uma das maneiras de monitorar aspectos de segurança. Objetivo: Quantificar e classificar as interações medicamentosas potenciais com hidroxicloroquina de acordo com o riscoem prescrições de pacientes com COVID-19 em pacientes com COVID-19 em uso de hidroxicloroquina admitidos em uma unidade de terapia intensiva de um Hospital de Ensino.Metodologia:Este estudo transversal baseou-se na análise de 162 prescrições de 38 pacientes admitidos em uma unidade de terapia intensiva de um Hospital de ensino entre abril e junho de 2020.O Micromedex® e o UpToDate® foram as bases de dados de apoio à conduta clínica utilizadas para estabelecer as interações medicamentosas potenciais. Resultados:A média de dias de internamento foi de 16,1 ± 14,0 e a média de dias em uso de hidroxicloroquina foi de 4,26 ± 1,74. 87,14% das prescrições apresentaram interações medicamentosas potenciais e a mais comum foi entre hidroxicloroquina e azitromicina. 76,4% das prescrições analisadas apresentaram interações medicamentosas potenciais com hidroxicloroquina. 73,5% das prescrições tiverampelo menos uma interação medicamentosa potencial entre medicamentos que prolongam o intervalo QT. Conclusões: Tendo em vista os riscos da exposição de pacientes críticos às interações medicamentosas, este estudo demonstra a necessidade de fortalecer nas instituições hospitalares a cultura de monitoramento de parâmetros de segurança e eficáciano uso de medicamentos, inclusive em terapias experimentais com a utilização de medicamentos off-labelpara minimizar riscos e ampliar possíveis benefícios (AU).

Even in health emergencies, when experimental therapies are employed, it is important to ensure the safety and efficacy of medicines, and the analysis of medical prescriptions is one of the ways to monitor safety aspects.Objective: Quantify and rank potential drug interactions with hydroxychloroquine according to risk in prescriptions of COVID-19 patients taking hydroxychloroquine admitted to an intensive care unit of a TeachingHospital.Methodology: This cross-sectional study was based on the analysis of 162 prescriptions of 38 patients admitted to an intensive care unit of a teaching hospital between April and June 2020. Micromedex® and UpToDate® were the clinical practice support databases used to establish potential drug interactions. Results: The mean number of days of hospitalization was 16.1 ± 14.0 and the mean number of days of days on hydroxychloroquine was 4.26 ± 1.74. 87.14% of the prescriptions presented potential drug interactions and the most common was between hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. 76.4% of the analyzed prescriptions had potential drug interactions with hydroxychloroquine. 73.5% of prescriptions had at least one potential drug interaction between drugs that prolong the QT interval. Conclusions: In view of the risks of exposure of critically ill patients to drug interactions, this study interactions, this study demonstrates the need to strengthen in hospital institutions the culture of institutions the culture of monitoring safety and efficacy parameters in the use of medicines, including experimental therapies with the use of off-label drugs to minimize risks and increase possible benefits (AU).

Aunque en médio aemergencias sanitarias, cuando son empleadas terapias experimentales, es importante estimar la seguridad y eficacia en el uso de los medicamentos, y el análisis de prescripciones es una de las formas de acompanhar los aspectos de seguridad. Objetivo:Cuantificar y clasificar las interaciones farmacologicas potenciales con hidroxicloroquina de acuerdo com el riesgo em prescripciones de pacientes com Covid-19 em uso de hidroxicloroquina andmitidos em unidad de terapia intensiva de um Hospital Docente. Metodología: Este estudio transversal se asienta en el análisis de 162 prescripciones de 38 pacientes admitidos em uma unidad de terapia intensiva de um Hospital Docente entre abril y junio de 2020. El Micromedex®ï¸y el UpToDate®ï¸fueron las bases de datos de apoyo a la actuación clínica utilizadas para establecer las interacciones farmacológicas potenciales. Resultados:El promedio de días de internamiento fue de 16,1 ± 14,0 y el promedio de días en uso hidroxicloroquina fuede 4,26 ± 1,74. 87,14% de las prescripciones presentaron interacciones farmacológicas potenciales y la más común fue entre hidroxicloroquina y azitromicina. 76,4% de las prescripciones analizadas presentaron interaciones farmacológicas com hidroxicloroquina. 73,5% de las prescripciones tuvierion por lo menos uma interacción farmacológica potencial entre medicamentos que prolongam el intervalo QT. Conclusiones:Tenendo a la vista los riesgos de la exposición de pacientes críticos a las interaciones farmacológicas, este estudio demuestra la necesidad de reforzar em las instituiciones hospitalarias la cultura de monitoreo de parâmetros de seguridade y eficacio em el uso de medicamentos, incluso en terapias experimentales con utilización de medicamentos off-label, para minorar riesgos y ampliar los posibles beneficios (AU).

Caracterización de eventos adversos a hidroxicloroquina, ivermectina, azitromicina y tocilizumab en pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 en un hospital del Seguro Social de Salud del Perú / Characterization of adverse events to hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, azithromycin and tocilizumab in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 in a Peruvian Social Health Insurance hospital

Objetivos. Caracterizar los eventos adversos (EA) asociados a hidroxicloroquina (HQ), azitromicina (AZI), tocilizumab (TOB) e ivermectina (IVM) prescritos como «fuera de etiqueta» en el tratamiento de pacientes hospitalizados por la COVID-19. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó un análisis secundario transversal de la base de datos del sistema de farmacovigilancia del Seguro Social de Salud del Perú (EsSalud) de las notificaciones de EA a HQ, AZI, TOB e IVM provenientes del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins de abril a octubre del 2020. Se revisaron las historias clínicas digitales, se estimaron las tasas de reporte de EA y se evaluaron sus características por tipo de fármaco, tiempo de aparición, tipo por órgano-sistema afectado, gravedad y causalidad. Resultados. Se identificaron 154 notificaciones que describen un total de 183 EA posiblemente relacionados con HQ, AZI, TOB e IVM, siendo 8% la tasa de reporte de EA. La mediana de tiempo de aparición de EA fue de 3 días (RIC: 2-5). La mayoría fueron cardiovasculares, destacándose la prolongación del intervalo QT. Se observaron EA hepatobiliares principalmente asociados a TOB. La mayoría de los casos fueron moderados, no obstante, el 10,4% fue grave. Conclusiones. Se identificaron EA potencialmente asociados al uso de HQ, AZI, TOB e IVM contra la COVID-19, siendo los más frecuentes los de tipo cardiovasculares. A pesar de que la AZI, HQ e IVM poseen perfiles conocidos de seguridad, su empleo en la COVID-19 podría incrementar la aparición de EA por los factores de riesgo propios de esta infección. Se sugiere reforzar la vigilancia, especialmente, de TOB.

Objective. To characterize the adverse events (AEs) related to the off-label use of hydroxychloroquine (HQ), azithromycin (AZI), tocilizumab (TOB) and ivermectin (IVM) for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. Materials and Methods. We conducted a secondary cross-sectional analysis of the Peruvian Social Health Insurance (EsSalud) pharmacovigilance system database of AE notifications to HQ, AZI, TOB and IVM in the Edgardo Rebagliati Martins National Hospital from April to October 2020. Information was collected from digital medical records. We estimated AE reporting rates and evaluated their characteristics by drug type, time of occurrence, type by the affected organ-system, severity and causality. Results. We identified 154 notifications describing a total of 183 AE possibly related to HQ, AZI, TOB and IVM; the reporting rate was 8%. The median time of AE occurrence was 3 days (IQR: 2-5). Most were cardiovascular events; prolongation of the QT interval was the most frequent. Hepatobiliary AEs were mainly associated with TOB. Most cases were moderate, however, 10.4% were severe. Conclusions. We found AEs potentially associated with the use of HQ, AZI, TOB and IVM against COVID-19; cardiovascular events were the most frequent. Although AZI, HQ and IVM have known safety profiles, their use against COVID-19 could increase the occurrence of AE due to the risk factors inherent to this infection. Surveillance systems must be improved, especially those for TOB.

Fatores de risco para óbito e tempo de internação em pacientes com COVID-19 em uso de cloroquina e hidroxicloroquina: estudo de coorte retrospectivo / Risk factors for death and length of stay in patients with covid-19 using chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine: a retrospective cohort study

Objetivos: Comparar os desfechos clínicos e a sobrevida de pacientes adultos com COVID-19 expostos e não expostos a tratamento medicamentoso com cloroquina e hidroxicloroquina. Método: Trata-se de um estudo de coorte retrospectiva com dados coletados em um hospital de Vitória. Foram incluídos todos os pacientes de enfermarias e Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (UTI) com idade igual ou superior a 18 anos, com diagnóstico confirmado de COVID-19, ou seja, com PCR positivo para a infecção, atendidos no hospital entre 26 de fevereiro a 31 de dezembro de 2020, e com registro de alta hospitalar por motivo de óbito ou não óbito. Aplicou-se a estatística descritiva (frequência absoluta e relativa) e teste do Qui-quadrado e Exato de Fisher para verificar associação entre as variáveis dependentes e independentes, considerando o índice de confiança (IC) de 95%. As variáveis contínuas foram analisadas por meio de medidas de tendência central (mínimo, máximo, média, mediana e desvio padrão). Para avaliar a existência de diferença nas médias com relação ao desfecho do tratamento medicamentoso para as variáveis contínuas, utilizou-se o teste não paramétrico de Mann-Whitney. Aplicou-se o método de Kaplan Meier para comparar o tempo de tratamento e demais variáveis independentes de interesse. Por fim, para analisar o tempo de internação até a ocorrência de óbito, utilizou-se o modelo de regressão de Cox com os respectivos riscos bruto e ajustado. As análises foram realizadas no programa R versão 4.1.2. e, em todas, considerado o nível de significância de 5% e intervalo de confiança de 95% (IC95%). Resultados: A amostra foi composta por 896 indivíduos; a maioria com idade média de 53,4 anos, do sexo feminino, etnia parda, casada, com ensino médio completo, não tabagista. O tempo médio de internação foi de 9,77 dias e 7,13 dias de tratamento medicamentoso para COVID-19. Cerca de 42,1% apresentaram mais de duas comorbidades e as mais prevalentes foram diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (45%), hipertensão arterial (44,9%) e doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (14,6%). Durante a internação, 16,4% dos indivíduos precisaram de ventilação mecânica e 51,3% utilizaram cloroquina ou hidroxicloroquina durante a internação. Evoluíram para óbito 99 indivíduos. Ainda, houve a utilização de mais de três medicamentos por 873 pessoas. Na análise bivariada, estiveram associados ao tratamento com cloroquina ou hidroxicloroquina a idade (p=0,0045), ventilação mecânica (p=0,0010), parada cardiorrespiratória (p=0,0010), hipoglicemia (p=0,0310), polifarmácia (p=0,0010) e número de comorbidades (p=0,0010). A taxa de ocorrência de óbitos em pessoas divorciadas (OR: 2,4904; p=0,398; IC 95% 0,9125-0,4438) e viúvas (OR: 1,9823; p=0,0277; IC 95% 0,6842-0,3108) foi maior do que em pessoas casadas. A taxa de ocorrência de óbito entre pessoas com escore qSOFA positivo foi 2,70 (OR: 2,7018; p=0,0009; IC 95% 0,9939-0,2981) vezes maior do que as com escore qSOFA negativo. Na análise de associação entre ventilação mecânica e demais variáveis independentes, entre os indivíduos que não faziam o uso da ventilação mecânica, os viúvos e os que apresentavam qSOFA positivo apresentaram mais chance de óbito. O índice de massa corporal (IMC) elevado apresentou-se como fator protetor, tido que a chance de óbito reduziu em 10,97% para cada aumento de 1 unidade no IMC entre os indivíduos em ventilação mecânica. Por fim, no modelo completo do ajuste de efeitos principais com base nos estratos de ventilação mecânica, para analisar a homogeneidade dos grupos, os resultados encontrados acerca do risco em divorciados, viúvos e qSOFA positivo permaneceram conforme análises anteriores. Conclusão: dos 11% dos pacientes com COVID-19 que evoluíram para o óbito, 6,8% fizeram uso de cloroquina ou hidroxicloroquina. As taxas de sobrevivência apresentaram-se menores em pacientes indígenas, do sexo masculino, viúvos e que fizeram uso de ventilação mecânica. Ainda, o baixo IMC foi considerado fator de risco para a mortalidade em pacientes com COVID-19 em ventilação mecânica, já o estado civil destacou-se como fator protetor em pessoas casadas

Objectives: To compare clinical outcomes and survival of adult patients with COVID19 exposed and not exposed to drug treatment with chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine. Method: This is a retrospective cohort study with data collected in a hospital in Vitória. All patients in wards and Intensive Care Units (ICU) aged 18 years or over, with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, that is, with a positive PCR for the infection, treated at the hospital between February 26th and December 31, 2020, and with a record of hospital discharge due to death or non-death. Descriptive statistics (absolute and relative frequency) and the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were applied to verify the association between the outcome and independent variables, considering the confidence index (CI) of 95%. Continuous variables were analyzed using measures of central tendency (minimum, maximum, mean, median and standard deviation). To assess the existence of a difference in means in relation to the outcome of drug treatment for continuous variables, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used. The Kaplan Meier method was applied to compare treatment time and other independent variables of interest. Finally, to analyze the length of hospital stay until death, the Cox regression model was used with the respective crude and adjusted risks. The analyzes were carried out using the R program version 4.1.2. and, in all cases, a significance level of 5% and a confidence interval of 95% (95% CI) were considered. Results: The sample consisted of 896 individuals; the majority with an average age of 53.4 years, female, mixed race, married, with completed high school, non-smokers. The average length of stay was 9.77 days and 7.13 days of drug treatment for COVID-19. Around 42.1% had more than two comorbidities and the most prevalent were type 2 diabetes mellitus (45%), hypertension (44.9%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (14.6%). During hospitalization, 16.4% of individuals required mechanical ventilation and 51.3% used chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine during hospitalization. 99 individuals died. Furthermore, more than three medications were used by 873 people. In the bivariate analysis, age (p=0.0045), mechanical ventilation (p=0.0010), cardiorespiratory arrest (p=0.0010), hypoglycemia (p=0.0310) were associated with treatment with chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, polypharmacy (p=0.0010) and number of comorbidities (p=0.0010). The rate of death in divorced people (OR: 2.4904; p=0.398; 95% CI 0.9125-0.4438) and widows (OR: 1.9823; p=0.0277; 95% CI 0 .6842-0.3108) was higher than in married people. The rate of death among people with a positive qSOFA score was 2.70 (OR: 2.7018; p=0.0009; 95% CI 0.9939-0.2981) times higher than those with a negative qSOFA score. In the analysis of the association between mechanical ventilation and other independent variables, among individuals who did not use mechanical ventilation, widowers and those with a positive qSOFA were more likely to die. High BMI was a protective factor, as the chance of death reduced by 10.97% for each increase of 1 unit in BMI among individuals on mechanical ventilation. Finally, in the complete main effects adjustment model based on the mechanical ventilation strata, to analyze the homogeneity of the groups, the results found regarding the risk in divorced, widowed and positive qSOFA remained in line with previous analyses. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that the use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine by patients with COVID-19 may be related to the occurrence of deaths and did not reduce the chance of mechanical ventilation. Survival rates were lower in indigenous, male, widowed patients who used mechanical ventilation and drug treatment with chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine. Furthermore, the results indicate that chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine are not beneficial in the treatment of COVID-19, however, further studies are necessary

Dados de Vida Real sobre o Uso da Hidroxicloroquina ou da Cloroquina Combinadas ou Não à Azitromicina em Pacientes com Covid-19: Uma Análise Retrospectiva no Brasil / Real-Life Data on Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine with or Without Azithromycin in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Analysis in Brazil

Resumo Fundamento Apesar da ausência de evidência mostrando benefícios da hidroxicloroquina e da cloroquina combinadas ou não à azitromicina no tratamento da covid-19, esses medicamentos têm sido amplamente prescritos no Brasil. Objetivos Avaliar desfechos, incluindo moralidade hospitalar, alterações eletrocardiográficas, tempo de internação, admissão na unidade de terapia intensiva, e necessidade de diálise e de ventilação mecânica em pacientes hospitalizados com covid-19 que receberam cloroquina ou hidroxicloroquina, e comparar os desfechos entre aqueles pacientes e seus controles pareados. Métodos Estudo multicêntrico retrospectivo do tipo coorte que incluiu pacientes com diagnóstico laboratorial de covid-19 de 37 hospitais no Brasil de março a setembro de 2020. Escore de propensão foi usado para selecionar controles pareados quanto a idade, sexo, comorbidades cardiovasculares, e uso de corticosteroides durante a internação. Um valor de p<0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significativo. Resultados Dos 7850 pacientes com covid-19, 673 (8,6%) receberam hidroxicloroquina e 67 (0,9%) cloroquina. A idade mediana no grupo de estudo foi 60 (46-71) anos e 59,1% eram mulheres. Durante a internação, 3,2% dos pacientes apresentaram efeitos adversos e 2,2% necessitaram de interromper o tratamento. Alterações eletrocardiográficas foram mais prevalentes no grupo hidroxicloroquina/cloroquina (13,2% vs. 8,2%, p=0,01), e o prolongamento do intervalo QT corrigido foi a principal diferença (3,6% vs. 0,4%, p<0,001). O tempo mediano de internação hospitalar foi maior no grupo usando CQ/HCQ em relação aos controles (9,0 [5,0-18,0] vs. 8,0 [4,0-14,0] dias). Não houve diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os grupos quanto a admissão na unidade de terapia intensiva (35,1% vs. 32,0%; p=0,282), ventilação mecânica invasiva (27,0% vs. 22,3%; p=0,074) ou mortalidade (18,9% vs. 18,0%; p=0,682). Conclusão Pacientes com covid-19 tratados com cloroquina ou hidroxicloroquina apresentaram maior tempo de internação hospitalar, em comparação aos controles. Não houve diferença em relação a admissão em unidade de terapia intensiva, necessidade de ventilação mecânica e mortalidade hospitalar.

Abstract Background Despite no evidence showing benefits of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine with or without azithromycin for COVID-19 treatment, these medications have been largely prescribed in Brazil. Objectives To assess outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, electrocardiographic abnormalities, hospital length-of-stay, admission to the intensive care unit, and need for dialysis and mechanical ventilation, in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who received chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, and to compare outcomes between those patients and their matched controls. Methods A retrospective multicenter cohort study that included consecutive laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients from 37 Brazilian hospitals from March to September 2020. Propensity score was used to select matching controls by age, sex, cardiovascular comorbidities, and in-hospital use of corticosteroid. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results From 7,850 COVID-19 patients, 673 (8.6%) received hydroxychloroquine and 67 (0.9%) chloroquine. The median age in the study group was 60 years (46 - 71) and 59.1% were women. During hospitalization, 3.2% of patients presented side effects and 2.2% required therapy discontinuation. Electrocardiographic abnormalities were more prevalent in the chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine group (13.2% vs. 8.2%, p=0.01), and the long corrected QT interval was the main difference (3.6% vs. 0.4%, p<0.001). The median hospital length of stay was longer in the HCQ/CQ + AZT group than in controls (9.0 [5.0, 18.0] vs. 8.0 [4.0, 14.0] days). There was no statistical differences between groups in intensive care unit admission (35.1% vs. 32.0%; p=0.282), invasive mechanical ventilation support (27.0% vs. 22.3%; p=0.074) or mortality (18.9% vs. 18.0%; p=0.682). Conclusion COVID-19 patients treated with chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine had a longer hospital length of stay, when compared to matched controls. Intensive care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, dialysis and in-hospital mortality were similar.

Research progress of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy / 中华眼底病杂志

Hydroxychloroquine is widely used in a variety of autoimmune diseases. However, long-term use of hydroxychloroquine can cause severe retinopathy, which has a complex pathogenic mechanism and diverse clinical manifestations, mainly manifested as photoreceptor and retinal pigment epithelial damage and irreversible vision loss. Identifying damage before retinitis pigment epithelium lesions preserve central vision, so early detection is crucial to slow disease progression and reduce vision loss. The development of multimodal imaging technology and the issuance of the latest treatment guidelines provide a powerful tool for the early screening and treatment of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy. Proficient in the latest guidelines for the treatment of hydroxychloroquine can better guide clinicians to do a good job in disease screening and management, recommend risks, safe dosages and appropriate screening procedures to patients and strengthen the prevention of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy, which will help save the vision of more patients and reduce the waste of medical resources.

Effect of perioperative hydroxychloroquine on cardiac surgery in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus / 中华胸心血管外科杂志

Objective:To evaluate the effect of perioperative application of hydroxychloroquine on the prognosis of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.Methods:All SLE patients in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University who took hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoid for more than 7 days before operation were enrolled in the observation group(28 cases), including 3 males and 25 females, aged(38.3±8.2)years old. Patients who did not use hydroxychloroquine but only used glucocorticoid before operation were included in the control group(24 cases), including 2 males and 22 females, aged(37.9 ±9.8)years old. There was no significant difference in preoperative clinical data between the two groups in terms of sex, age, BMI, course of systemic lupus erythematosus, hemoglobin, albumin, C-reactive protein, ALT, serum creatinine, ejection fraction, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, alcoholism, preoperative atrial arrhythmia, ventricular arrhythmia, atrioventricular block and so on. The constituent ratio of preoperative operation plan was basically the same between the two groups. The postoperative complications and survival of the two groups were compared.Results:There was no significant difference in early clinical indexes between the two groups, such as cardiopulmonary bypass time( t=0.12, P=0.19), chest drainage volume( t=0.30, P=0.77), second thoracotomy hemostasis( χ2=1.17, P=0.46). There was no significant difference in drug-related complications such as new retinopathy, myocardial concentric hypertrophy, atrial arrhythmia( χ2=1.27, P=0.26), ventricular arrhythmia( χ2=0.98, P=0.32), atrioventricular block( χ2=0.06, P=0.82) and other drug-related complications between the observation group and the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in postoperative acute heart failure( χ2=1.17, P=0.28), acute liver insufficiency( χ2=1.17, P=0.28), sternal infection and IABP use( χ2=0.47, P=0.50). Compared with the control group, the incidence of acute renal insufficiency after operation was lower in the observation group( χ2=4.51, P=0.04). The incidence of new postoperative pneumonia was lower( χ2=8.26, P=0.01). The length of postoperative antibiotic use, the length of postoperative ICU hospital stay, the postoperative hospital stay and the total cost of hospitalization in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group( z=2.71, 2.09, 2.02, 2.02, P=0.01, 0.04, 0.04, 0.04). Compared with the control group, the in-hospital mortality rate of patients in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(3.6% vs. 12.5%, χ2=0.47, P=0.50), and the 6-month and 1-year survival rates of the observation group were higher than those of the control group(92.9% vs.83.3%, 92.9% vs.79.2%; χ2=0.41, 2.17; P=0.53, 0.34), but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion:Perioperative administration of hydroxychloroquine can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative acute renal insufficiency and pneumonia, reduce the duration of postoperative antibiotic use, postoperative ICU hospital stay, postoperative hospital stay, and the cost of hospitalization. Hydroxychloroquine may reduce the in-hospital mortality and improve the long-term survival rate after cardiac surgery, but long-term large sample clinical studies are still needed.

Oral nano-formulation improves pancreatic islets dysfunction via lymphatic transport for antidiabetic treatment

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) therapy is facing the challenges of long-term medication and gradual destruction of pancreatic islet β-cells. Therefore, it is timely to develop oral prolonged action formulations to improve compliance, while restoring β-cells survival and function. Herein, we designed a simple nanoparticle with enhanced oral absorption and pancreas accumulation property, which combined apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter-mediated intestinal uptake and lymphatic transportation. In this system, taurocholic acid (TCA) modified poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) was employed to achieve pancreas location, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was loaded to execute therapeutic efficacy, and 1,2-dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DLPC) was introduced as stabilizer together with synergist (PLGA-TCA/DLPC/HCQ). In vitro and in vivo results have proven that PLGA-TCA/DLPC/HCQ reversed the pancreatic islets damage and dysfunction, thus impeding hyperglycemia progression and restoring systemic glucose homeostasis via only once administration every day. In terms of mechanism PLGA-TCA/DLPC/HCQ ameliorated oxidative stress, remodeled the inflammatory pancreas microenvironment, and activated PI3K/AKT signaling pathway without obvious toxicity. This strategy not only provides an oral delivery platform for increasing absorption and pancreas targetability but also opens a new avenue for thorough T2DM treatment.

Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: A Single Center, Retrospective Cohort Study

@#Introduction: The outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in December 2019 called for a rapid solution, leading to repurposing of existing drugs. Due to its immunomodulatory effect and antiviral properties, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been used in early 2020 for treatment of COVID-19 patients. This study was conducted to evaluate the treatment outcome of HCQ monotherapy in Malaysia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in COVID-19 ward in Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL), from March to April 2020. A total of 446 COVID-19 patients were recruited, only 325 patients were finally included for analysis. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS, with a significant value set at p<0.05. Results: The mean age of the patients were 38.5 ±15.5. They were majority male, (n=210, 64.6%) Malaysian (n=239, 73.5%) and Malay ethnicity (n=204, 62.8%). Ninety-one (28%) patients received HCQ monotherapy. HCQ monotherapy was associated with worse outcome (OR: 10.29, 95% CI 1.17-90.80). There was a significant difference in mean length of stay between those with and without HCQ treatment (t323=5.868, p<0.001, 95% CI, 2.56-5.31). The average length of stay for HCQ treated group was 3.84 days longer than those without treatment. 6.6% of the patient receiving HCQ monotherapy encountered adverse drug effects. Conclusion: Similar to study reported worldwide, our study demonstrated that HCQ did not improve length of stay and the outcome of COVID-19 patients.

Hidroxicloroquina para Pacientes com COVID-19 não Hospitalizados: Uma Revisão Sistemática e Metanálise de Ensaios Clínicos Randomizados / Hydroxychloroquine for Non-Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Resumo Fundamento: Revisões sistemáticas anteriores não identificaram benefício do uso da hidroxicloroquina ou da cloroquina em pacientes com COVID-19 não hospitalizados. Após a publicação dessas revisões, os resultados do COPE, o maior ensaio clínico randomizado até hoje, tornaram-se disponíveis. Objetivos: Conduzir uma revisão sistemática e metanálise de ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECRs) para sintetizar as evidências sobre a eficácia e a segurança da hidroxicloroquina e da cloroquina em pacientes com COVID-19 não hospitalizados em comparação a controle ou tratamento padrão. Métodos: As buscas foram conduzidas nos bancos de dados PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library e ClinicalTrials.gov, e complementadas por busca manual. Foram realizadas metanálises diretas e avaliações de risco de viés e certeza da evidência, incluindo análise do tamanho ótimo da informação (OIS, optimal information size). Um nível de significância de 0,05 foi adotado na metanálise. PROSPERO: CRD42021265427. Resultados: Oito ECRs com 3219 participantes foram incluídos. As taxas de internação por COVID-19 e de eventos adversos não foram significativamente diferentes entre hidroxicloroquina (5,6% e 5,1%) e controle (7,4% e 20,4%) [risco relativo (RR) 0,77, intervalo de confiança 95% (IC95%), 0,57-1,04, I2: 0%; RR 1,78, IC95% 0,90; 3,52, I2: 93%, respectivamente)]. O OIS (7880) não foi alcançado para hospitalização por COVID-19, independentemente da simulação para a taxa de evento e redução do RR estimados. Conclusão: A evidência de muito baixa qualidade indicou falta de benefício com hidroxicloroquina em prevenir internações por COVID-19. Apesar de ser a revisão sistemática com o maior número de participantes incluídos, o OIS, considerando a resposta à infecção anterior à vacinação, não foi atingido.

Abstract Background: Previous systematic reviews have identified no benefit of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. After publication of these reviews, the results of COPE, the largest randomized trial conducted to date, became available. Objectives: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to synthesize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine for non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients compared to placebo or standard of care. Methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov complemented by manual search. Pairwise meta-analyses, risk of bias, and evidence certainty assessments were conducted, including optimal information size analysis (OIS). A level of significance of 0.05 was adopted in the meta-analysis. PROSPERO: CRD42021265427. Results: Eight RCTs with 3,219 participants were included. COVID-19 hospitalization and any adverse events rates were not significantly different between hydroxychloroquine (5.6% and 35.1%) and control (7.4% and 20.4%) (risk ratio, RR, 0.77, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.57-1.04, I2: 0%; RR 1.78, 95%-CI 0.90; 3.52, I2: 93%, respectively). The OIS (7,880) was not reached for COVID-19 hospitalization, independently of the simulation for anticipated event rate and RR reduction estimate. Conclusion: Evidence of very low certainty showed lack of benefit with hydroxychloroquine in preventing COVID-19 hospitalizations. Despite being the systematic review with the largest number of participants included, the OIS, considering pre-vaccination response to infection, has not yet been reached.

The Ototoxicity of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine: A Systematic Review

Abstract Introduction Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are antimalarial drugs widely used in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. With the global pandemic caused by the new coronavirus, there was an increase in the prescription of these drugs, which led to a major concern regarding their ototoxic effects. Objectives The objective of the present study was to assess existing scientific evidence about the toxic effects of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine on the peripheral and/or central auditory system. Data Synthesis A systematic literature review was performed by searching the PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, and SciELO electronic databases, in a search of articles that fullfiled the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review was conducted in three phases and, in all of them, analyses were performed by two independent researchers. Disagreements were discussed with a third researcher until a consensus was reached. A total of 437 articles were found and 8 were included in this review. Seven of the included studies reported hearing loss in their samples and presented a diagnostic hypothesis of ototoxicity induced by chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine. The most common type of hearing loss was sensorineural, with varying laterality and degrees of severity. The most frequently used audiological test was pure tone audiometry, and only two studies assessed brainstem evoked responses. Conclusion The scientific evidence compiled in this research showed that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have an ototoxic effect in the peripheral auditory system. These drugs can cause cochlear damage, including changes in the stria vascularis and lesions in sensory hair cells.

COVID-19 pneumonitis and lupus pneumonitis: a challenge in diagnosis and early therapeutic consideration

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute respiratory illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. It has various clinical manifestations, from asymptomatic to severe disease with possible multi-organ involvement, with respiratory and vascular systems being the frequent affected. COVID-19 can affect patients with autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The concurrent of both diseases may show the similar characteristic which can asa challenge in diagnosis and early therapeutic consideration. We report a case of 53 year-old Balinese woman patient who previously diagnosed with acute respiratory iIlness (Pneumonitis),The patient with past history of SLE since 2005, takes 200 mg hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and 4 mg methylprednisolone once a day orally without adverse effect. Then she was confirmed with SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19 pneumonitis) concurrent with SLE flare (Lupus pneumonitis). The clinical similarities were fever, dry coughand shortness of breath with the chest X-ray(CXR) was bilateral interstitiil infiltrate. Laboratory results; a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test, leucophenia, increased ESR, slightly increased CRP, decreased CD4 and CD8 cell count. Decreasedoxygen saturation, requiring 4 L of oxygen via nasal cannula on admission.She was given therapyofantibiotics, antivirus and other symptomatic. The prior SLE maintenance therapywas continued with increasingmethylprednisolone dose. The patient抯condition was improved and weaned off her oxygen requirements. Shewas dischargedandfollowed by home isolation for 14 days.

Estratégias discursivas de defesa da cloroquina e da hidroxicloroquina: uma etnografia de vídeos publicados no YouTube Brasil em 2020 / Discursive strategies in defense of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine: a ethnography of videos published on YouTube Brazil in 2020

O presente projeto propõe analisar estratégias argumentativas na circulação de informação envolvendo o uso de cloroquina (difosfato de cloroquina) e hidroxicloroquina (sulfato de hidroxicloroquina) para tratamento da Covid-19 no YouTube Brasil, entre os meses de março a julho de 2020, em perfis da plataforma. Os atores sociais que emergem e o contexto político social no Brasil pandêmico também nos guiam para a construção de uma linha do tempo, em uma sucessão de acontecimentos recentes envolvendo os dois medicamentos, médicos/cientistas e o Governo Federal. Nosso intento é refazer a trajetória das substâncias, os argumentos utilizados para validar a terapêutica para Covid-19 em detrimento de medidas não farmacológicas. Foi construída uma perspectiva biográfica e etnográfica para analisar as tentativas de legitimação desses medicamentos por médicos e pesquisadores durante o primeiro ano da pandemia de Covid-19, bem como foram consultados documentos oficiais do Governo Federal de modo a enriquecer o estudo. Assim, propomos uma reflexão acerca das falas proferidas por médicos e cientistas defensores do uso desses dois medicamentos, recorrendo aos programas de TV repostadas em perfis do YouTube e aos debates em lives, focalizando na análise etnográfica do conteúdo do material. AU

The present project proposes to analyze argumentative strategies in the circulation of information involving the use of chloroquine (chloroquine diphosphate) and hydroxychloroquine (hydroxychloroquine sulfate) for Covid-19 treatment on YouTube Brazil, between the months of March and July 2020, in profiles on the platform. The emerging social actors and the social political context in pandemic Brazil also guide us to construct a timeline, in a succession of recent events involving the two drugs, doctors/scientists, and the federal government. Our intent is to retrace the trajectory of the substances, the arguments used to validate the therapy for Covid-19 in detriment of non-pharmacological measures. A biographical and ethnographic perspective was built to analyze the attempts to legitimize these drugs by doctors and researchers during the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as official documents from the Federal Government were consulted in order to enrich the study. Thus, we propose a reflection about the speeches given by doctors and scientists who defend the use of these two drugs, resorting to tv shows reposted in YouTube profiles and debates in lives, focusing on the ethnographic analysis of the content of the material. AU

Hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

ABSTRACT Objective We performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 patients. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS (January 2019 to March 2021) for patients aged 18 years or older, who had COVID-19 and were treated with hydroxychloroquine versus placebo or standard of care. We also searched the WHO Clinical Trials Registry for ongoing and recently completed studies, and the reference lists of selected articles and reviews for possible relevant studies, with no restrictions regarding language or publication status. Random-effects models were used to obtain pooled mean differences of treatment effect on mortality, and serious adverse effects between hydroxychloroquine and the Control Group (standard of care or placebo); heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 and the Cochran´s Q statistic. Results Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in mortality rate between patients treated with hydroxychloroquine compared to standard of care or placebo (16.7% versus 18.5%; pooled risk ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.19). Also, the rate of serious adverse effects was similar between both Groups, Hydroxychloroquine and Control (3.7% versus 2.9%; pooled risk ratio 1.22; 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.96). Conclusion Hydroxychloroquine is not efficacious in reducing mortality of COVID-19 patients. Prospero database registration (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero) under number CRD42020197070.

Justificativa e Desenho do Ensaio Clínico Randomizado COVID-19 Outpatient Prevention Evaluation (COPE - Coalition V): Hidroxicloroquina vs. Placebo em Pacientes Não Hospitalizados / Rationale and Design of the COVID-19 Outpatient Prevention Evaluation (COPE - Coalition V) Randomized Clinical Trial: Hydroxychloroquine vs. Placebo in Non-Hospitalized Patients

Resumo Fundamento Apesar da necessidade de opções terapêuticas específicas para a doença do coronavírus 2019 (covid-19), ainda não há evidências da eficácia de tratamentos específicos no contexto ambulatorial. Há poucos estudos randomizados que avaliam a hidroxicloroquina (HCQ) em pacientes não hospitalizados. Esses estudos não indicaram benefício com o uso da HCQ; no entanto, avaliaram desfechos primários diferentes e apresentaram vieses importantes na avaliação dos desfechos. Objetivo Investigar se a HCQ possui o potencial de prevenir hospitalizações por covid-19 quando comparada ao placebo correspondente. Métodos O estudo COVID-19 Outpatient Prevention Evaluation (COPE) é um ensaio clínico randomizado, pragmático, duplo-cego, multicêntrico e controlado por placebo que avalia o uso da HCQ (800 mg no dia 1 e 400 mg do dia 2 ao dia 7) ou placebo correspondente na prevenção de hospitalizações por covid-19 em casos precoces confirmados ou suspeitos de pacientes não hospitalizados. Os critérios de inclusão são adultos (≥ 18 anos) que procuraram atendimento médico com sintomas leves de covid-19, com randomização ≤ 7 dias após o início dos sintomas, sem indicação de hospitalização na triagem do estudo e com pelo menos um fator de risco para complicações (> 65 anos, hipertensão, diabetes melito, asma, doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica ou outras doenças pulmonares crônicas, tabagismo, imunossupressão ou obesidade). Todos os testes de hipótese serão bilaterais. Um valor de p < 0,05 será considerado estatisticamente significativo em todas as análises. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04466540. Resultados Os desfechos clínicos serão avaliados centralmente por um comitê de eventos clínicos independente cegado para a alocação dos grupos de tratamento. O desfecho primário de eficácia será avaliado de acordo com o princípio da intenção de tratar. Conclusão Este estudo apresenta o potencial de responder de forma confiável a questão científica do uso da HCQ em pacientes ambulatoriais com covid-19. Do nosso conhecimento, este é o maior estudo avaliando o uso de HCQ em indivíduos com covid-19 não hospitalizados.

Abstract Background Despite the need for targeting specific therapeutic options for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), there has been no evidence of effectiveness of any specific treatment for the outpatient clinical setting. There are few randomized studies evaluating hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in non-hospitalized patients. These studies indicate no benefit from the use of HCQ, but they assessed different primary outcomes and presented important biases for outcome evaluation. Objective To evaluate if HCQ may prevent hospitalization due to COVID-19 compared to a matching placebo. Methods The COVID-19 Outpatient Prevention Evaluation (COPE) study is a pragmatic, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the use of HCQ (800 mg on day 1 and 400 mg from day 2 to day 7) or matching placebo for the prevention of hospitalization due to COVID-19 in early non-hospitalized confirmed or suspected cases. Inclusion criteria are adults (≥ 18 years) seeking medical care with mild symptoms of COVID-19, with randomization ≤ 7 days after symptom onset, without indication of hospitalization at study screening, and with at least one risk factor for complication (> 65 years; hypertension; diabetes mellitus; asthma; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other chronic lung diseases; smoking; immunosuppression; or obesity). All hypothesis tests will be two-sided. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant in all analyses. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04466540. Results Clinical outcomes will be centrally adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee blinded to the assigned treatment groups. The primary efficacy endpoint will be assessed following the intention-to-treat principle. Conclusion This study has the potential to reliably answer the scientific question of HCQ use in outpatients with COVID-19. To our knowledge, this is the largest trial evaluating HCQ in non-hospitalized individuals with COVID-19.

The effect of favipiravir versus hydroxychloroquine on clinical and laboratory findings in COVID-19 in healthcare workers

Abstract Objectives Comparative data on hydroxychloroquine and favipiravir, commonly used agents in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), are still limited. In this study, it was aimed to compare treatment outcomes in healthcare workers with COVID-19 who were prospectively followed by the occupational health and safety unit. Methods A total of 237 healthcare-workers, diagnosed as mild or moderate COVID-19 between March 11, 2020 and January 1, 2021, were given hydroxychloroquine (n = 114) or favipiravir (n = 123). Clinical and laboratory findings were evaluated. Results The mean age of the patients was 33.4±11.5 years. The mean time to negative PCR was found to be significantly shorter in patients receiving favipiravir compared to the hydroxychloroquine group (10.9 vs. 13.9 days; p < 0.001). The rate of hospitalization in the hydroxychloroquine group was significantly higher than favipiravir group (15.8% vs. 3.3%). In terms of side effects; the frequency of diarrhea in patients receiving hydroxychloroquine was significantly higher than that in the favipiravir group (31.6% vs. 6.5%; p < 0.001). Conclusions Favipiravir and hydroxychloroquine were similar in terms of improvement of clinical symptoms of healthcare workers with mild or moderate COVID-19 infection, but favipiravir was significantly more effective in reducing viral load and hospitalization rates. Furthermore, favipiravir caused significantly less side-effects than hydroxychloroquine.

Sales of "COVID kit" drugs and adverse drug reactions reported by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency / Vendas de "kit-COVID" e reações adversas a esses medicamentos relatadas pela Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária / Ventas de medicamentos del "kit-COVID" y reacciones adversas a los medicamentos notificadas por la Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria

Off-label use of azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, and ivermectin (the "COVID kit") has been suggested for COVID-19 treatment in Brazil without clinical or scientific evidence of efficacy. These drugs have known adverse drug reactions (ADR). This study aimed to analyze if the sales of drugs in the "COVID kit" are correlated to the reported number of ADR after the COVID-19 pandemic began. Data was obtained from the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) website on reported sales and ADRs for azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, and ivermectin for all Brazilian states. The period from March 2019 to February 2020 (before the pandemic) was compared to that from March 2020 to February 2021 (during the pandemic). Trend adjustment was performed for time series data and cross-correlation analysis to investigate correlation between sales and ADR within the same month (lag 0) and in the following months (lag 1 and lag 2). Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess the magnitude of the correlations. After the pandemic onset, sales of all investigated drugs increased significantly (69.75% for azithromycin, 10,856,481.39% for hydroxychloroquine, and 12,291,129.32% for ivermectin). ADR levels of all medications but azithromycin were zero before the pandemic, but increased after its onset. Cross-correlation analysis was significant in lag 1 for all drugs nationwide. Spearman's correlation was moderate for azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine but absent for ivermectin. Data must be interpreted cautiously since no active search for ADR was performed. Our results show that the increased and indiscriminate use of "COVID kit" during the pandemic correlates to an increased occurrence of ADRs.

No Brasil, o uso off label de azitromicina, hidroxicloroquina e ivermectina (o "kit-COVID") foi sugerido para tratar COVID-19 sem que tivéssemos evidências clínicas ou científicas de sua eficácia. Estas drogas têm causado reações adversas (RA) em quem as tomam. Este estudo almejou analisar se a venda dos medicamentos que compõem o "kit-COVID" correlaciona-se com o número relatado de RAs após o início da pandemia da COVID-19. Os dados sobre vendas e RA associados a azitromicina, hidroxicloroquina e ivermectina foram obtidos no site da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa) para todos os estados brasileiros. Comparamos o período entre março de 2019 e fevereiro de 2020 (antes da pandemia) ao de março de 2020 a fevereiro de 2021 (durante a pandemia). Ajustamos tendências para os dados de séries temporais e as análises de correlação cruzada para investigar a correlação entre vendas e RA em um mesmo mês (lag 0) e nos seguintes (lag 1 e 2). O coeficiente de correlação de Spearman foi utilizado para avaliar a magnitude das correlações. Após o início da pandemia, as vendas de todos os medicamentos investigados aumentaram significativamente (69,75% para azitromicina, 10.856.481,39% para hidroxicloroquina e 12.291.129,32% para ivermectina). Os níveis de RAs de todos os medicamentos (com exceção de azitromicina) eram zero antes da pandemia mas aumentaram após seu início. A análise de correlação cruzada foi significativa no lag 1 para todas as drogas em todo o país. A correlação de Spearman foi moderada para azitromicina e hidroxicloroquina, mas ausente para ivermectina. Os dados devem ser interpretados com cautela, uma vez que não realizamos uma busca ativa por RA. Nossos resultados mostram que o uso aumentado e indiscriminado do "kit-COVID" durante a pandemia se correlaciona com uma ocorrência aumentada de RAs.

Se ha sugerido el uso fuera de lo establecido de azitromicina, hidroxicloroquina e ivermectina (el "kit-COVID") para el tratamiento de la COVID-19 en Brasil sin evidencia clínica o científica de su eficacia. Estos medicamentos tienen reacciones adversas (RAM) conocidas. Este estudio pretendía analizar si las ventas de medicamentos del "kit-COVID" están correlacionadas con el número de reacciones adversas notificadas tras el inicio de la pandemia de COVID-19. Los datos se obtuvieron del sitio web de la Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria (Anvisa) sobre las ventas y las RAM notificadas para la azitromicina, la hidroxicloroquina y la ivermectina para todos los estados brasileños. Se comparó el periodo de marzo de 2019 a febrero de 2020 (antes de la pandemia) con el de marzo de 2020 a febrero de 2021 (durante la pandemia). Se realizó un ajuste de tendencia para los datos de las series de tiempo y un análisis de correlación cruzada para investigar la correlación entre las ventas y la RAM dentro del mismo mes (lag 0) y en los meses siguientes (lag 1 y lag 2). Se utilizó el coeficiente de correlación de Spearman para evaluar la magnitud de las correlaciones. Tras el inicio de la pandemia, las ventas de todos los medicamentos investigados aumentaron significativamente (69,75% para la azitromicina, 10.856.481,39% para la hidroxicloroquina y 12.291.129,32% para la ivermectina). Los niveles de RAM de todos los medicamentos, excepto la azitromicina, eran nulos antes de la pandemia, pero aumentaron tras su inicio. El análisis de correlación cruzada fue significativo en el lag 1 para todos los medicamentos a nivel nacional. La correlación de Spearman fue moderada para la azitromicina y la hidroxicloroquina, pero no para la ivermectina. Los datos deben interpretarse con cautela, ya que no se realizó una búsqueda activa de RAM. Nuestros resultados muestran que el uso creciente e indiscriminado del "kit-COVID" durante la pandemia se correlaciona con una mayor aparición de las RAM.

Efficacy and safety of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID19 infection: An umbrella review

Introduction: Among all therapeutic approaches for COVID-19, most controversies have been raised about the efficacy and safety hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine. We conducted an umbrella review to assess any potential benefits of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in treating COVID-19.Methods: We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed and covid-evidence.org from December 2019 until July 2022. Time to viral clearance, need for mechanical ventilation and mortality were assessed as main efficacy outcomes. The analysis was performed using R package version 4.1.2.Result : Hydroxychloroquine had no benefit in decreasing time to viral clearance at days 7 (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.63, 1.03) and 14 (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.90, 1.139). Chloroquine has no statistically significant effect in decreasing the time of viral negativity at days 7 (RR 1.20; 95%CI 0.64, 2.25) and 14 (RR 1.08; 95%CI 0.85, 1.36). There is no difference in the need for mechanical ventilation among hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin versus standard of care groups. Hydroxychloroquine marginally increased the mortality rate compared to placebo but not statistically significant (RR 1.09; P-value 0.05). Adding azithromycin to hydroxychloroquine had no statistically significant effect of decreasing mortality (RR 0.52; 95%CI 0.13, 2.07). Treatments with hydroxychloroquine increased the risk of adverse effects (RR 2.71; 95%CI 1.66, 4.43; p-value <0.0001). Adding azithromycin to hydroxychloroquine increased the adverse events (RR 1.74; 95% CI 1.27, 2.38). Conclusion: Though access to antivirals is an important challenge in developing countries, the decision to sus-pend hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in treating COVID-19 appears right