Comparative study on the efficacy of mifepristone versus mifepristone and misoprostol in the induction of labor in cases of intrauterine fetal demise

Background: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of two labor induction methods, mifepristone alone and mifepristone followed by misoprostol, in cases of intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) beyond 28 weeks of gestation.Methods: A prospective study was carried out at, BRD Medical College in Gorakhpur and aimed to investigate the efficacy of two different methods for labor induction in pregnancies with intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) beyond 28 weeks of gestation during September 2019 to August 2020. Sixty participants were divided into two groups of 30 each, with mifepristone administered orally in both groups. Group 2 received additional vaginal misoprostol. Patient demographics, Bishop scores, induction to active labor intervals, and induction to delivery intervals were examined. Augmentation methods, side effects, complications, and time to full dilatation were analyzed.Results: The groups exhibited similar patient characteristics, including age, parity, socioeconomic status, and literacy rates. Gestational age at induction and Bishop scores were comparable. Both groups showed substantial improvements in Bishop scores. The induction to active labor interval was shorter in the mifepristone group, and the induction to delivery interval was similar. The mifepristone group required fewer mifepristone tablets, while the combination group used less misoprostol, reducing side effects. Complications were minimal, with a decreased need for augmentation methods in both groups.Conclusions: Mifepristone, whether used alone or followed by misoprostol, proved effective in labor induction for IUFD beyond 28 weeks. Mifepristone's ability to enhance cervical ripening and prostaglandin sensitivity makes it a promising option for reducing the risks associated with delayed birth in cases of IUFD. These findings suggest that mifepristone can be a valuable addition to obstetric practices, particularly in cases where traditional induction methods may pose greater risks.

Comparison of two labor induction regimens with intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg and adverse perinatal outcomes

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare two labor induction regimens (4 and 6 h), to determine predictors of successful labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg tablets, and to evaluate the association with adverse perinatal outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included singleton pregnancies undergoing induction of labor with an intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg tablet between 37 and 42 weeks of gestation. The pregnant women were divided into two groups: Group 1—intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg every 4 h and Group 2—intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg every 6 h. RESULTS: Pregnant women were divided into Group 1 (n=289) and Group 2 (n=278). Group 1 had a higher median number of intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg tablets (3.0 vs. 2.0 tablets, p<0.001), a lower prevalence of postpartum hemorrhage (7.6 vs. 32.7%, p<0.001), and a higher need for oxytocin (odds ratio [OR]: 2.1, 95%CI: 1.47-2.98, p<0.001) than Group 2. Models including intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg tablets every 4 and 6 h [x2(1)=23.7, OR: 4.35, p<0.0001], parity [x2(3)=39.4, OR: 0.59, p=0.031], and Bishop's score [x2(4)=10.8, OR: 0.77, p=0.019] were the best predictors of failure of labor induction. A statistically significant difference between groups was observed between the use of the first intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg tablet at the beginning (Breslow p<0.001) and the end of the active labor phase (Long Hank p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women who used intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg every 4 h had a longer time from the labor induction to the beginning of the active phase of labor and higher rates of adverse perinatal outcomes than women who used intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg every 6 h.

Evaluation of the efficacy of labor induction with vaginal misoprostol in a low-risk pregnant women population

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate and predictors of labor induction using vaginal misoprostol in a low-risk pregnant women population. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out with 196 pregnant women. Groups 2 and 4 of the Robson Classification admitted for induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol (25 μg tablets every 6 h, up to 4 tablets, for a maximum of 24 h). The success of labor induction was considered the achievement of vaginal delivery. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the best predictors of successful induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol. RESULTS: Of all the pregnant women analyzed, 140 (71.4%) were successful and 56 (28.6%) were unsuccessful. Pregnant women who achieved successful induction had a higher number of pregnancies (1.69 vs. 1.36, p=0.023), a higher number of deliveries (0.57 vs. 0.19, p<0.001), a higher Bishop score (2.0 vs. 1.38, p=0.002), and lower misoprostol 25 μg tablets (2.18 vs. 2.57, p=0.031). No previous deliveries [x2(1)=3.14, odds ratio (OR): 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10-0.57, R2 Nagelkerke: 0.91, p=0.001] and the presence of one previous delivery [x2(1)=6.0, OR: 3.40, 95% CI: 1.13-10.16, R2 Nagelkerke: 0.043, p=0.029] were significant predictors of successful induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol. CONCLUSION: A high rate of labor induction success using vaginal misoprostol in a low-risk population was observed, mainly in multiparous and with gestational age>41 weeks. No previous delivery decreased the success of labor induction, while one previous delivery increased the success of labor induction.

Comparison between effectiveness of sublingual misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone gel for induction of labour in pregnant women

Background: This hospital-based, prospective, comparative interventional study aimed to compare the effectiveness of sublingual misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone gel for induction of labor in primigravida women. Methods: A total of 100 patients were alternately assigned to induction with either Misoprostol 25mcg 6 hourly or dinoprostone Gel 0.5mg 6 hourly. Results: The induction delivery interval was significantly longer in the dinoprostone group compared to the misoprostol group. The incidence of fetal distress was slightly higher in the Dinoprostone group, but the difference was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of respiratory distress, birth asphyxia, and APGAR 1 MIN <6. Conclusions: This study suggests that sublingual misoprostol (a type of prostaglandin E1, or PGE1) is more effective than intracervical dinoprostone gel (a type of prostaglandin E2, or PGE2) for cervical ripening and induction of labor.

Comparison between effectiveness of sublingual misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone gel for induction of labour in pregnant women

Background: This hospital-based, prospective, comparative interventional study aimed to compare the effectiveness of sublingual misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone gel for induction of labor in primigravida women. Methods: A total of 100 patients were alternately assigned to induction with either Misoprostol 25mcg 6 hourly or dinoprostone Gel 0.5mg 6 hourly. Results: The induction delivery interval was significantly longer in the dinoprostone group compared to the misoprostol group. The incidence of fetal distress was slightly higher in the Dinoprostone group, but the difference was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of respiratory distress, birth asphyxia, and APGAR 1 MIN <6. Conclusions: This study suggests that sublingual misoprostol (a type of prostaglandin E1, or PGE1) is more effective than intracervical dinoprostone gel (a type of prostaglandin E2, or PGE2) for cervical ripening and induction of labor.

Randomized and controlled trial to determine safety and efficacy of Foley’s catheter and PGE2 gel for induction of labor

Background: The goal of obstetrics is a pregnancy that results in a healthy infant and a healthy mother. During medical or obstetrics complications of pregnancy, cervical ripening and induction of labor are often required. Different methods are available for that. Aims and Objectives: Randomized and control trial has been conducted to determine safety and efficacy of Foley’s catheter and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) gel for induction of labor. Materials and Methods: Randomized and controlled trial has been conducted on 200 study participant who fullfield inclusion criteria in Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, GMERS Medical College, Sola during the period of July 2017–July 2019. Statistical analysis was done by descriptive statistics and qualitative method. Results: Both groups cerviprim and Foley’s catheter are comparable for cervical ripening for induction of labor in terms of safety and efficacy as there was no statistically significant observation for obstetric and perinatal outcome. Conclusion: Foley’s catheter is equally dependable method for cervical ripening for induction of labor as cerviprim gel as it is cost effective and easily available.

Determinants of successful labor induction in a teaching hospital in Nigeria: a 10-year review / Determinantes da indução do trabalho de parto bem sucedida em hospital-escola na Nigéria: uma revisão de 10 anos

Abstract Objectives: to evaluate the success rate of labor induction and determinants of successful outcome. Methods: retrospective cohort study of parturients that undergone labor induction between 2006 and 2015. Data was retrieved from the medical records and multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the determinants of successful labor induction. Results: the rate of labor induction was 10.9%. Out of the 940 women analysed, six hundred and fifty-six women (69.8%) had successful vaginal delivery. Labor induction at 39-40 weeks (OR=2.70; CI95%=1.17-6.36), 41 weeks (OR=2.44; CI95%=1.14-5.28), estimated fetal weight between 2.5 and 3.4kg (OR=4.27, CI95%=1.96-5.59) and estimated fetal weight of 3.5-3.9kg (OR=5.45; CI95%=2.81-10.60) increased the odds of achieving vaginal delivery. Conclusions: our findings suggest that 39, 40 and 41 weeks are optimal gestational ages for labor induction with respect to successful vaginal delivery. Also, estimated fetal weight between 2.5kg and 3.9kg favours successful vaginal delivery.

Resumo Objetivos: avaliar a taxa de sucesso da indução do trabalho de parto e determinantes de um resultado bem sucedido. Métodos: estudo de coorte retrospectivo de parturientes que submeteram a indução de trabalho de parto entre 2006 e 2015. Os dados foram recuperados dos registros médicos e a regressão logística multivariada foi utilizada para avaliar os determinantes da indução de trabalho de parto bem sucedida. Resultados: a taxa de indução de trabalho de parto foi de 10,9%. Das 940 mulheres analisadas, seiscentas e cinquenta e seis mulheres (69,8%) tiveram um parto vaginal bem sucedido. A indução de trabalho de parto nas 39-40 semanas (OR=2,70; IC95%=1,17-6,36), 41 semanas (OR=2,44; IC95%=1,14-5,28), peso fetal estimado entre 2,5 e 3,4kg OR=4,27; IC95%=1,96-5,59) e peso fetal estimado entre 3,5-3,9kg (OR=5,45; IC95%=2,81-10,60) aumentou as probabilidades de conseguir um parto vaginal. Conclusões: as nossas conclusões sugerem que as 39, 40 e 41 semanas são idades gestacionais ideais para a indução do trabalho de parto no que diz respeito ao sucesso do parto vaginal. Além disso, o peso fetal estimado entre 2,5kg e 3,9kg favorece o parto vaginal bem sucedido.

Eficacia y seguridad del misoprostol vaginal comparado con dinoprostona en maduración cervical e inducción del parto / Effectiveness and safety of vaginal misoprostol vs dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction

Resumen OBJETIVO: Comparar la eficacia del misoprostol intravaginal con el dispositivo vaginal de liberación prolongada de dinoprostona en la inducción del parto. Además, analizar el perfil de seguridad en relación con los desenlaces maternos y perinatales. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo y comparativo efectuado en pacientes atendidas entre 2018 y 2020 en el Área Sanitaria de Ferrol, La Coruña, España, con partos que se iniciaron con inducción con prostaglandinas. Las pacientes se dividieron en dos cohortes, en función de la prostaglandina sintética administrada (misoprostol por vía vaginal o dinoprostona en dispositivo intravaginal). Para la comparación entre ambos grupos se aplicó la prueba U de Mann-Whitney. Para las variables cualitativas se describió su cantidad total y el porcentaje, que se compararon con prueba de χ2 de Pearson. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 508 pacientes con inducción del parto. En las indicaciones de ésta no se encontraron diferencias entre uno y otro grupo, aunque destacó la indicación del misoprostol en pacientes con embarazo cronológicamente prolongado (63%) y de dinoprostona en rotura prematura de membranas (49%). En relación con los desenlaces perinatales, se registró un Apgar menor de 7 a los 5 minutos en 2 pacientes tratadas con dinoprostona y 1 con misoprostol; así como un pH arterial umbilical menor de 7.10 en 8 pacientes tratadas con dinoprostona y 7 con misoprostol. CONCLUSIONES: Los datos aquí reportados hacen suponer que ambas prostaglandinas consiguen una tasa de inicio del parto similar, aunque la dinoprostona parece reducir el tiempo hasta el inicio del parto en mujeres con indicación de inducción.

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol with the dinoprostone extended-release vaginal device in labor induction. In addition, to analyze the safety profile in relation to maternal and perinatal outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective and comparative study performed in patients attended between 2018 and 2020 in the Health Area of Ferrol, La Coruña, Spain, with deliveries that were initiated with prostaglandin induction. The patients were divided into two cohorts, depending on the synthetic prostaglandin administered (misoprostol vaginally or dinoprostone in intravaginal device). The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the two groups. For qualitative variables, the total number and percentage were described and compared with Pearson's 2 test. RESULTS: A total of 508 patients undergoing labor induction were analyzed. No differences were found in the indications for induction of labor between one group and the other, although the indication for misoprostol in patients with chronologically prolonged pregnancy (63%) and for dinoprostone in premature rupture of membranes (49%) stood out. In relation to perinatal outcomes, an Apgar of less than 7 at 5 minutes was recorded in 2 patients treated with dinoprostone and 1 with misoprostol; as well as an umbilical arterial pH of less than 7.10 in 8 patients treated with dinoprostone and 7 with misoprostol. CONCLUSIONS: The data reported here suggest that both prostaglandins achieve a similar rate of onset of labor, although dinoprostone appears to reduce the time to onset of labor in women indicated for induction.

Inducción de trabajo de parto en pacientes COVID-19: experiencia en el Hospital San Juan de Dios / Labor induction in COVID-19 patients: experience in the San Juan de Dios Hospital

INTRODUCCIÖN Y OBJETIVOS: Describir la experiencia de los partos en gestantes con diagnóstico confirmado de COVID 19 mediante RT-PCR asintomáticas o con sintomatología leve y aquellas sin la enfermedad, y determinar la tasa de éxito de parto vaginal en inducción de trabajo de parto. MÉTODOS: Análisis retrospectivo de pacientes que tuvieron su parto entre 15 de Abril y 03 de Julio del 2020 en el Hospital San Juan de Dios. Se incluyeron las pacientes inducidas con Dinoprostona, Oxitocina o ambas de manera secuencial y se dividieron según estatus COVID 19 mediante RT-PCR al ingreso. Se caracterizó demográficamente el grupo de pacientes positivas y se determinaron los datos de ambos grupos en relación a la necesidad de inducción de trabajo de parto y su éxito para parto vaginal. RESULTADOS: De un total de 657 nacimientos, hubo un 9.7% (n=64) de pacientes con COVID 19, de las cuales un 23.4% (n=15) requirió inducción de trabajo de parto, con una tasa de éxito para parto vaginal de un 66.7% (n=10). De estas pacientes, un 50% recibió Oxitocina, un 40% Dinosprostona y un 10% ambos medicamentos de forma secuencial. En las pacientes negativas, hubo un total de 568 nacimientos, con un 29.8% (n=169) de usuarias que requirieron inducción. La tasa de éxito para parto vaginal en este grupo fue de 72.2% (n=122), utilizando un 50% Oxitocina; un 27% Dinoprostona; un 14.8% ambas; y un 8.2% Balón de Cook. CONCLUSIONES: Sabemos que los resultados de este estudio están limitados por el bajo número de pacientes incluidas, sin embargo, podemos observar que, en nuestra experiencia con las pacientes que arrojaron PCR SARS-CoV-2 positivas, asintomáticas o con enfermedad leve, se logró realizar la inducción de trabajo de parto según protocolos habituales, obteniendo porcentajes de éxito para partos vaginales, similares a las pacientes sin la enfermedad.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Describe the experience of deliveries in pregnant women with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID 19 by asymptomatic RT-PCR or with mild symptoms and those without the disease, and determine the success rate of vaginal delivery in the induction of labor. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients who had their delivery between 15th April and 03rd of July, 2020 in the San Juan de Dios Hospital. Patients induced with Dinoprostone, Oxytocin or both sequentially were included, and were divided according to COVID 19 status by RT-PCR on their admission process. The group of positive patients was demographically characterized and the data of both groups was determined in relation to the need for labor induction and its success for vaginal delivery. RESULTS: Of a total of 657 births, there were 9.7% (n = 64) of patients with COVID 19, of which 23.4% (n = 15) required labor induction, with a success rate for vaginal delivery of 66.7% (n = 10). Of these patients, 50% received Oxytocin, 40% Dinosprostone and 10% both drugs sequentially. In the negative patients, there were a total of 568 births, with 29.8% (n = 169) of users requiring labor induction. The success rate for vaginal delivery in this group was 72.2% (n = 122); 50% using Oxytocin; 27% Dinoprostone; 14.8% using both; and 8.2% using Cook's Catheter. CONCLUSIONS: We know that the results of this study are limited by the low number of patients included, however, in our experience, we can observe that, in patients with SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive, asymptomatic or with mild disease, it was possible to perform induction of labor according to standard protocols, achieving success rates for vaginal deliveries, similar to patients without the disease.

Comparison of intravenous oxytocin infusion versus intracervical dinoprostone followed after 6 hours by intravenous oxytocin infusion for labor induction in prelabor rupture of membranes: A randomized controlled trial / Philippine Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Background@#A prolonged interval from prelabor rupture of membranes to delivery is associated with an increase in the incidence of maternal and neonatal morbidities and mortality. Various agents have been tested to improve the cervical Bishop score to expedite the delivery of the fetus and lessen the maternal and neonatal complications.@*Objective@#To compare two protocols for labor induction in pregnant women with prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM).@*Population@#Subjects were recruited from the University of Santo Tomas Hospital (Private Division and Clinical Division). Pregnant women with a live, term, singleton fetus, cephalic presentation, a reactive Non stress test, who presented with PROM and a Bishop score of ?5, with no previous Cesarean section, or other uterine surgery.@*Methodology@#This is a two-arm superiority, open label, randomized controlled trial. Pregnant women with a live, term, singleton fetus, cephalic presentation, a reactive Non stress test, who presented with PROM and a Bishop score of ?5, and with no previous Cesarean section or other uterine surgery were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous (IV) oxytocin infusion or intracervical dinoprostone 0.5 mg gel followed 6 hours later by IV oxytocin infusion.@*Results@#Vaginal delivery within 24 hours of labor induction increased significantly with intracervical dinoprostone gel followed by IV oxytocin infusion (87% versus 61%; RR: 1.43; 95% CI: 0.99 – 2.06; P<0.044). Comparable result was observed for nulliparous women included in the study population. The time interval from labor induction to active phase was significantly shorter in the dinoprostone-oxytocin group than in the oxytocin alone group (2.4 ± 2.1 versus 6.3 ± 1.4 hours; p<0.001). The time interval from labor induction to delivery was also significantly shorter in the dinoprostoneoxytocin group (6.3 ± 1.5 versus 10.4 ± 1.4 hours; p<0.000). Cesarean delivery rates were statistically similar in the dinoprostone-oxytocin and oxytocin alone groups (17% versus 40%; p=0.102). The neonatal outcomes were comparable in both groups, except for birth weight.@*Conclusion@#Intracervical dinoprostone 0.5 mg gel followed 6 hours later by an oxytocin infusion in term women presenting with PROM and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop Score of 5 or less) was associated with a higher rate of vaginal delivery within 24 hours, shorter time interval from labor induction to active phase of labor, and shorter time interval from labor induction to delivery, and no difference in maternal and neonatal complications was observed compared with oxytocin infusion alone.

Frecuencia de episiotomías en un hospital de tercer nivel / Frequency of episiotomy in a third-level hospital

OBJETIVO: Determinar la frecuencia y correlación de las episiotomías y desgarros en pacientes con parto eutócico. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional y retrospectivo efectuado en el Hospital General Universitario de Alicante en dos periodos: 1) 2008-2012 y 2) 2013-2018. Se incluyen los partos eutócicos de embarazos únicos, a término, en presentación cefálica. Variables de estudio: episiotomía, desgarro, edad, semanas de embarazo, paridad, inducción del parto, cesárea anterior, analgesia regional, peso y sexo del recién nacido. Los resultados se expresan en porcentaje, coeficiente de correlación y las variables implicadas con razón de momios (RM). RESULTADOS: La tasa de episiotomía entre el periodo 1 vs el 2 disminuyó de manera muy importante: de 42.3 a 32.8%; [p < 0.001; RM: 0.81 (0.78-0.84)]. En cambio, el porcentaje de desgarros aumentó: de 42.7 a 50.8%; (p < 0.001; RM: 1.16[1.13-1.20]). El coeficiente de correlación fue de -0.91. Uno de los factores de riesgo asociados con la episiotomía fue la edad menor de 35 años, con RM de 1.25; IC95%: 1.16-1.35; p < 0.001, pero fue un factor protector de desgarros con RM de 0.76; IC95%: 0.71-0.81; p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONES: La tendencia de la episiotomía es decreciente, mientras que la de desgarro es inversamente proporcional. No se encontraron diferencias en la tasa de desgarro de III y IV grado.

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and correlation of episiotomies and tears of patients with eutocic deliveries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational and retrospective study carried out at the Hospital General de Alicante, Spain, in two periods: 1) 2008-2012 and 2) 2013-2018. Eutocic deliveries of single pregnancies, at term, in cephalic presentation are included. Study variables: episiotomies, tear, age, weeks of pregnancy, parity, labor induction, previous caesarean section, regional analgesia, weight and sex of the newborn. The results are expressed as a percentage, correlation coefficient and the variables involved with odds ratio. RESULTS: The episiotomy rate between period 1 vs. 2 decreased very significantly: 42.3% vs 32.8%; [p <0.001; OR: 0.81 (0.78-0.84)]. In contrast, the percentage of index tears: 42.7% vs 50.8%; (p <0.001; OR: 1.16 [1.13-1.20]). The correlation coefficient was -0.91. Regarding risk factors associated with episiotomy, one of them was the age under 35 years with an OR (95% CI): 1.25 (1.16-1.35; p <0.001), but it was a OR protective factor (95% CI): 0.76 (0.71-0.81; p <0.001) for the appearance of tears. CONCLUSIONS: The tendency in the realization of episiotomies is decreasing, while the tendency of the appearance of tears is inversely proportional. No differences were found in the tear rate of III and IV grade.

The role of oral mifepristone in pre-induction cervical ripening at term

Background: Planned induction of labor is an established part of modern obstetrics and is used as a definite form of treatment where continuation of pregnancy would be detrimental to the health of mother or fetus. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of mifepristone in pre-induction cervical ripening and labor induction.Methods: A total of 200 pregnant women at term with Bishop Score 4 or less were selected for this prospective randomized placebo-controlled study. The sample was equally divided into study group to receive 200 mg of mifepristone and control group to receive placebo orally for 2 days. Bishop score was assessed at every 24 hours interval till patient entered in spontaneous labor or 72 hours after 1st dose. Women who did not enter labor spontaneously, labor induction was planned with per vaginal insertion of prostaglandin (PG) E2 analogue, Dinoprostone gel 2.5 mg or PGE1 analogue Tab. Misoprostol 25 µg.Results: Ninety-six subjects in the study group and eighty-one in the control achieved successful ripening of cervix and the difference was statistically significant. Sixty-eight of study group and thirty-nine of placebo group entered in spontaneous active labor within 72 hours. Requirement of oxytocin as adjuvant treatment was significantly lower in the study group. Nineteen women of study group and fifteen of control group delivered within 24 hours, and eighty-one of study group and sixty-two of placebo delivered in 48 hours. The mean induction delivery interval was 35.53±13.67 hours in the study group, whereas it was significantly prolonged in the placebo group 50.49±20.92 hours. Eighty-two subjects of study group and seventy-eight of the control group delivered vaginally, the differences were statistically not significant.Conclusions: Mifepristone was found to be an effective agent for cervical priming prior to labor induction in women at term and significantly reduces the induction delivery interval compared with placebo.

Efficacy of vaginal Misoprostol versus transcervical Foley’s catheter and vaginal Misoprostol in induction of labor

Background: The objective is to compare the efficacy of vaginal Misoprostol versus transcervical Foley’s catheter and vaginal Misoprostol.Methods: A prospective study analyzing the comparative efficacy of intravaginal instillation of Misoprostol in two groups (tablet Misoprostol 50mg alone and combination of intracervical Foley’s catheter and tablet Misoprostol 50mg) carried out in the labour room on 300 subjects (150 subjects in each group), from May 2013 to November 2015.Results: The common gestational age at the time of induction was 36-40 weeks and the most common indication was premature rupture of membrane. In both the groups, most of the cases delivered within 12 hours. present results show that statistically significant number of cases delivered vaginally within 12 hours with the group using Misoprostol plus Foley’s catheter as compared to the group using Misoprostol alone. Cesarean section rate was 12.67% in Misoprostol group and 10.67% in Misoprostol plus Foley’s catheter group. Incidence of failure of induction was similar in both the groups. The incidence of babies with Apgar score less than 8/10 at 5 minutes and incidence of early neonatal death were similar in both the groups.Conclusions: Addition of intracervical Foley’s catheter to vaginal Misoprostol for induction of labor in subjects with unfavorable cervices reduces the Induction-Delivery interval without added side effects or complications to the mother and fetus.

Exercise in pregnancy: the impact of an intervention program in the duration of labor and mode of delivery / Exercício na gravidez: impacto de um programa de intervenção na duração do trabalho de parto e via de parto

Abstract Objective To access the benefits or harms of an exercise program, based on the current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines, on the mode of delivery, duration and onset of labor. Methods A study performed at the Hospital Senhora da Oliveira between October 2015 and February 2017. This was a quasi-experimental study involving 255 women divided into two groups: an intervention group engaged in a controlled and supervised exercise program during pregnancy (n = 99), and a control group that did not participate in the exercise program (n = 156). Data were collected in two stages: during the 1st trimester biochemical screening (before the beginning of the program), through a written questionnaire, and after delivery, from the medical files of the patients. The significance level in the present study was 5% (p = 0.05). Results The control group had higher odds of induced labor (odds ratio [OR] 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42-5.17; p = 0.003), when compared with women who underwent the intervention. No differences were found between the groups in instrumental vaginal deliveries, cesarean rate, time until the beginning of the active phase, duration of the active phase, and duration of the second stage of labor. Conclusion The implementation of a controlled and supervised exercise program in pregnancy was associated with significantly lower odds of induced deliveries.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar o efeito de um programa de exercícios na gravidez (baseado nas recomendações do American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) na via, duração e início do trabalho de parto. Métodos Estudo realizado no Hospital Senhora da Oliveira entre outubro de 2015 e fevereiro de 2017. Trata-se de um estudo quasi-experimental com 255 grávidas, divididas em dois grupos: grupo de intervenção, constituído por mulheres que participaram de um programa controlado e supervisionado de exercícios físicos (n = 99), e um grupo de controle, formado por grávidas que não participaram do programa de exercícios (n = 156). Os dados foram colhidos em dois momentos: durante o rastreio bioquímico do primeiro trimestre (antes do início do programa), através de um questionário escrito, e após o parto, através da consulta do processo clínico da paciente. O nível de significância estatística adotado neste projeto foi de 5% (p = 0,05). Resultados O grupo controle apresentou maior probabilidade de indução do trabalho de parto (razão de chances [RC] 2,71; intervalo de confiança [IC] 95%: 1,42-5,17; p = 0,003) quando comparado com o grupo de intervenção. Não foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os dois grupos em relação à via de parto, tempo até início da fase ativa, duração da fase ativa e duração do segundo estadio do trabalho de parto. Conclusão A implementação de um programa de exercícios controlado e supervisionado na gravidez foi associada a uma probabilidade significativamente menor de indução do trabalho de parto.

The application study of the virtual touch tissue quantification technique in predicting the outcome of labor induction / 中华超声影像学杂志

Objective To estimate cervical stiffness during late pregnancy with virtual touch tissue quantification technique(VTQ) and investigate the value of predicting the outcome of labor induction. Methods Cervical length in pregnancy women at 35 -41 weeks′gestation was measured through perineum ultrasound examination before labor induction,and then VTQ was applied to measure shear wave velocity (SWV)values in region of interest(ROI),the maximum,minimum and average of SWV values were obtained from multiple SWV measurement under the VTQ mode. The outcomes of labor induction were tracked and Bishop scores were recorded,vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery groups were compared using Student′s t-test for continuous variables. ROC curve was plotted to analyze the correlation between parameters and the outcome of labor induction and to determine the most accurate SWV value and cut-off value for diagnosis.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine which of the following parameters were significant predictors of the outcome of labor induction. Results The SWV mix,SWV max and SWV mean of vaginal delivery and cesarean section were (0.92 ± 0.13)m/s,(1.37 ± 0.14)m/s,(1.13 ± 0.10)m/s and (1.03 ± 0.13)m/s,(1.74 ± 0.42)m/s,(1.36 ± 0.11)m/s,respectively, there were significant differences between vaginal delivery and cesarean section(all P < 0.05).Based on ROC curve analysis,the SWV mean value in cervix was the best value for predicting the outcome of labor induction.The cut-off value of SWV mean value was 1.23 m/s,the sensitivity,specificity and Youden index were 93.8%,83.4%,0.77,respectively.The SWV value and cervical length were closely correlated to the outcome of labor induction,especially the SWV value according to multivariate logistic analysis. Conclusions VTQ can assess the cervical stiffness with SWV values during pregnancy,and it may have an application value of predicting the outcome of labor induction.

Uso del balón cervical vs. prostaglandinas endocervicales para la inducción del parto en embarazo a término: revisión breve de literatura / Use of the cervical balloon vs. endocervical prostaglandins for the induction of labor in term pregnancy: literature brief review / Usando a bola cervical vs prostaglandinas endocervicais para indução do parto em gestação a termo: breve revisão da literatura

ResumenLas prácticas del cuidado del embarazo y el parto varían ampliamente entre los países, las instituciones y los diferentes equipos encargados del cuidado obstétrico: en este contexto con prácticas tan diversas, la práctica clínica basada en la evidencia permite que el accionar de los profesionales encargados del cuidado obstétrico se fundamente en la mejor evidencia disponible. El objetivo del presente estudio es analizar la mejor evidencia científica disponible sobre los efectos adversos del uso del balón cervical durante y posterior a la labor de parto, en comparación con el uso de prostaglandinas endocervicales para la inducción del parto en mujeres con embarazo a término. La secuencia de etapas para la recolección de la información se inició con la aplicación del mapa de búsqueda en las bases de datos MEDLINE, PUBMED y COCHRANE LIBRARY, a partir de los siguientes criterios de filtro de información: artículos publicados entre los años 2010 al 2015, mujeres gestantes de cualquier edad, únicamente se incluyó estudios como ensayos aleatorizados controlados, revisiones sistemáticas, meta-análisis o guías de práctica clínica y de preferencia artículos científicos en idioma inglés o portugués. Esta búsqueda y análisis de la evidencia encontrada se realizó durante los meses de abril y mayo del año 2015 por dos revisores. Los resultados obtenidos para el análisis crítico fueron revisados minuciosamente a través de la plataforma informática FCL 2.0 con las plantillas de ensayo clínico y revisión sistemática incluidas en los anexos. Se concluye que la utilización del balón endocervical comparado con el uso de prostaglandinas endocervicales presenta menos efectos adversos de manera específica durante la labor del parto. En relación con los efectos adversos posteriores, no se encuentra mayor diferencia entre uno u otro método.

AbstractPregnancy and childbirth care practices vary widely across countries, institutions, and different obstetrical care teams: in this context with such diverse practices, evidence-based clinical practice allows the Obstetric care is based on the best available evidence. The objective of the present study is to analyze the best available scientific evidence on the adverse effects of cervical balloon use during and after labor, compared to the use of endocervical prostaglandins for induction of labor in women with term pregnancy. The sequence of steps for the collection of information was initiated with the application of the search map in the databases MEDLINE, PUBMED and COCHRANE LIBRARY, based on the following information filter criteria: articles published between the years 2010 to 2015, Pregnant women of any age, only included studies such as randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyzes or guidelines of clinical practice and preferably scientific papers in English or Portuguese. This search and analysis of the evidence found was carried out during the months of April and May of the year 2015 by two reviewers. The results obtained for the critical analysis were carefully reviewed through the FCL 2.0 computer platform with the clinical trial templates and systematic review included in the annexes. It is concluded that the use of the endocervical balloon compared to the use of endocervical prostaglandins presents less adverse effects specifically during labor. In relation to the subsequent adverse effects, no greater difference is found between one or the other method.

ResumoPráticas de cuidados a gravidez eo parto variam amplamente entre os países, instituições e diferentes equipas de cuidados obstétricos; neste contexto como práticas diversas, a prática clínica baseada em evidências permite que as ações dos profissionais responsáveis pela assistência obstétrica é baseada na melhor evidência disponível. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar a melhor evidência científica disponível sobre os efeitos adversos durante e após o parto com o uso de bola cervical em comparação com o uso de prostaglandina endocervical para indução do parto em mulheres com gravidez a termo. A sequência dos passos para a recolha de dados começa com a busca do mapa aplicação em Medline, PubMed e os dados Cochrane Library, onde os seguintes critérios de filtro de informação artigos introduzidos foram seleccionados publicação período entre 2010 e 2015, a população foi delimitada a mulheres grávidas de qualquer idade, digite apenas ensaios estudos clínicos randomizados, revisões sistemáticas, meta-análises ou diretrizes de prática clínica e artigos científicos de preferência em Inglês ou Português foram incluídos. Esta pesquisa e análise da evidência encontrada foi realizado durante os meses de Abril e Maio de 2015, dois colaboradores. Os resultados obtidos para a análise crítica foram cuidadosamente controlados através da plataforma FCL computador 2,0 modelos ensaio clínico e revisão sistemática estão incluídos nos anexos. Concluiu-se que o uso de bola endocervical em comparação com a utilização de prostaglandinas endocervicais tem menos efeitos adversos especificamente durante o trabalho de parto. Em ligação com os efeitos adversos subsequentes não é maior diferença entre qualquer um dos métodos.

Induction of Labor using Misoprostol in a Tertiary Hospital in the Southeast of Brazil / Indução de parto utilizando misoprostol em um hospital terciário no sudeste do Brasil

Abstract Purpose To assess cases of labor induction with vaginal 25-μg tablets of misoprostol and maternal outcomes in a tertiary hospital in southeastern Brazil. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 412 pregnant women with indication for labor induction. Labor induction was performed with vaginal 25-μg tablets ofmisoprostol in pregnant women with Bishop scores < 6. Stepwise regression analysis was used to identify the factors present at the beginning of induction that could be used as predictors of successful labor induction. Results A total of 69% of the pregnant women who underwent labor induction progressed to vaginal delivery, and 31% of the women progressed to cesarean section. One or two misoprostol tablets were used in 244 patients (59.2%). Of the 412 patients, 197 (47.8%) required oxytocin later on in the labor process, after induction with misoprostol. The stepwise regression analysis showed that only Bishop scores of 4 and 5 and previous vaginal delivery were independent factors with statistical significance in the prediction of successful vaginal labor induction (β = 0.23, p < 0.001, for a Bishop score of 4 and 5, and β = 0.22, p < 0.001, for previous vaginal delivery). Conclusion Higher Bishop scores and previous vaginal delivery were the best predictors of successful labor induction with vaginal 25-μg tablets of misoprostol.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar os casos de indução do trabalho de parto com misoprostol 25 mcg por via vaginal e seus desfechos maternos em um hospital terciário do Sudeste do Brasil. Métodos Realizou-se um estudo retrospectivo de coorte com 412 gestantes com indicações para indução de trabalho de parto. A indução do trabalho de parto foi realizada com misoprostol 25 mcg vaginal em gestantes com índice de Bishop < 6. Realizou-se análise de regressão stepwise para identificar os fatores presentes ao início da indução que poderiam ser usados como prognosticadores do sucesso da indução do trabalho de parto. Resultados A indução de trabalho de parto determinou 69% de partos normais, sendo que 31% evoluíram para cesárea. Em relação ao número de comprimidos de misoprostol, 1 ou 2 comprimidos foram utilizados em 244 pacientes (59,2%). Das 412 pacientes, 197 (47,8%) necessitaramde ocitocina após a indução commisoprostol para dar continuidade ao trabalho de parto. Na análise de regressão stepwise, apenas a presença de índice de Bishop 4 e 5 e parto vaginal prévio foram fatores independentes com significância estatística na predição do sucesso da indução emobter parto vaginal (β = 0,23, p < 0,001, para índice de Bishop 4 e 5, e β = 0,22, p < 0,001, para parto vaginal prévio). Conclusão Maiores índices de Bishop e parto vaginal prévio são os maiores prognosticadores do sucesso de indução de trabalho de parto com misoprostol 25 mcg vaginal.

El Misofar® como prostaglandina facilitadora: una nueva opción en obstetricia / Misofar® as facilitator prostaglandin: a new option in obstetrics

La inducción del parto resulta un procedimiento elemental en la práctica obstétrica, que se aplica en un grupo importante de pacientes para interrumpir con éxito el embarazo debido a riesgos materno y perinatal. En este artículo se expone brevemente un nuevo método que permite abordar con efectividad la respuesta a la oxitocina, después del uso del Misofar® en función facilitadora para inducir el parto, acortando la latencia en la rotura prematura de membranas y condicionando las estructuras cervicales en gestantes con preeclampsia para obtener una mejor respuesta. Esta nueva herramienta se pone a disposición de la comunidad médica, en beneficio materno y perinatal.

Labor induction is an elementary procedure in obstetrics that is applied in an important group of patients to successfully interrupt pregnancy due to maternal and perinatal risks. In this work, a new method that allows to approach with effectiveness the oxytocin response is briefly exposed, after the use of Misofar® in facilitator function to induce labor, shortening the latency in early break of membranes and conditioning the cervical structures in pregnant women with pre-eclampsia to obtain a better response. This new tool is at medical community disposal for the maternal and perinatal benefit.

Sonda de Foley transcervical-oxitocina u oxitocina sola para la inducción del parto en embarazos a término / Transcervical Foley catheter­endovenous oxytocin or oxytocin alone for induction of labor in term pregnancres

Objetivo. Comparar la efectividad de la sonda de Foley transcervical más oxitocina con oxitocina endovenosa sola, en la inducción del parto en embarazos a término. Diseño. Estudio de casos y controles. Institución. Hospital Central "Dr. Urquinaona", Maracaibo, Venezuela. Participantes. Embarazadas a término que asistieron para maduración cervical e inducción del parto asignadas al azar con sonda de Foley transcervical - oxitocina endovenosa (grupo A) u oxitocina endovenosa (grupo B). Principales medidas de resultado. Características generales, intervalo inicio de la inducción y el parto, tasa de parto vaginal, complicaciones maternas, variables perinatales y efectos adversos. Resultados. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los grupos con relación a las características generales (p = ns). Las pacientes del grupo A presentaron un intervalo significativamente menor desde el inicio de la inducción hasta el parto comparado con las pacientes del grupo B (p < 0,05). No se hallaron diferencias significativas con relación a la tasa de partos vaginales entre los grupos (p = ns). No hubieron diferencias en los valores de Ápgar al minuto y a los 5 minutos entre los recién nacidos de ambos grupos (p = ns). El efecto adverso más común en ambos grupos fue náuseas, pero no se hallaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los grupos en la frecuencia de efectos adversos (p = ns). Conclusión. El uso sonda de Foley transcervical más oxitocina disminuye el intervalo entre el inicio de la inducción y el parto comparado con la oxitocina sola, con una incidencia similar de efectos adversos maternos y perinatales.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of transcervical Foley catheter - oxytocin with oxytocin alone for labor induction in term pregnancies. Design: Case-control study. Setting: Hospital Central "Dr. Urquinaona", Maracaibo, Venezuela. Participants: Pregnant women undergoing cervical ripening and labor induction were randomly assigned to be treated with transcervical Foley catheter - oxytocin (group A) or oxytocin alone (group B). Main outcome measures: General characteristics, interval between beginning of induction and delivery, vaginal birth rate, maternal complications, perinatal variables, and adverse effects were evaluated. Results: There were no significant differences between groups in general characteristics (p = ns). Patients of group A showed a shorter interval between the beginning of induction and delivery compared with patients in group B (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in vaginal birth rate between groups (p = ns). Newborns of both groups had similar mean values of Apgar scores at 1 minute and 5 minutes (p = ns). The most common adverse effect in both groups was nausea, but there were no significant differences between groups in frequency of adverse effects (p = ns). Conclusions: Use of transcervical Foley catheter - oxytocin shortened the interval between beginning of induction and delivery compared with oxytocin alone, with similar incidence of maternal and perinatal adverse effects.

Elastographic measurement of the cervix during pregnancy: Current status and future challenges

The cervix is a cylindrical structure that is proximally connected to the uterus and distally to the vaginal cavity. The Bishop score has been used to evaluate the cervix during pregnancy. However, alternatives have been evaluated because the Bishop score is uncomfortable for patients, relies on a subjective examination, and lacks internal os data. Elastography has been used to assess the cervix, as it can estimate tissue stiffness. Recent articles on elastography for cervical assessment during pregnancy have focused on its usefulness for prediction of preterm birth and successful labor induction. There is a clinical need for cervical elastography, as an evaluation of biomechanical factors, because cervical length only assesses morphological changes. However, until now, cervical elastography has been studied in the limited field, and not shown a uniformed methodological technique. In this review, the current status, limitations, and future possibility of cervical elastography were discussed. Future studies should focus on overcoming the limitations of cervical elastography. Although the cervical elastography is presently an incompletely defined technique, it needs to be improved and evaluated as a method for use in combination with cervical length.