Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University(Medical Sciences) ; (6): 191-195, 2022.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1011596

Résumé

【Objective】 To investigate the value of prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator (PCPT-RC) combined with biopsy Gleason score for predicting the risk of metastasis in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. 【Methods】 We retrospectively collected the data of 74 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer confirmed by biopsy from April 2019 to August 2021, concurrent with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT whole body imaging in the same period. Based on this, a binary logistic regression model was established to obtain the high risk probability of PCPT. We calculated the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was drawn and the area under the curve, Yuden index, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. We compared the predictive value of the prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator and Gleason score alone or in combination in predicting the risk of prostate cancer metastasis. 【Results】 Based on the PSMA PET/CT results, 74 patients were divided into non-metastatic group (46/74) and metastatic group (28/74). PCPT high risk probability [41.14% (16%-67%)] vs. [30.89% (5%-65%)], Gleason score [8.5(6-10) score] vs. [7.7(6-9) score], tPSA [26.24(5.70-42.32) ng/mL] vs. [19.58(2.47-49.35) ng/mL], and fPSA [3.94(0.82-12.00) ng/mL] vs. [2.33(0.35-10.20) ng/mL] were significantly higher in metastatic group than in non-metastatic group. Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that Gleason score and PCPT low risk probability may be independent predictors of prostate cancer metastasis. PCPT low risk probability alone did not predict the risk of prostate cancer metastasis (P=0.172). The predictive accuracy of Gleason score and high probability of PCPT in predicting prostate cancer metastasis were 0.715 and 0.679, respectively, and the accuracy of the combined prediction was 0.809. 【Conclusion】 PCPT-RC combined with Gleason score is valuable for predicting the metastasis risk of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients, which has certain guiding significance for clinical individualized treatment.

2.
National Journal of Andrology ; (12): 142-146, 2018.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-775205

Résumé

Objective@#The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator (PCPT-RC) is an online tool for assessing the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) based on age, race, serum PSA, biopsy history, family history, and other factors. This study aimed to investigate the value, sensitivity and specificity of the PCPT-RC 2.0 in assessing the risk of PCa in the Chinese high-risk population.@*METHODS@#This study included 622 patients with the high risk of PCa characterized by high serum PSA (PSA >3 μg/L) or abnormality in digital rectal examination or imaging of the prostate. According to the results of prostate biopsy, we divided the patients into a PCa and a non-PCa group and used the PCPT-RC 2.0 for evaluation of all the cases followed by statistical analysis.@*RESULTS@#PCa was detected in 264 (42.4%) of the 622 patients, including 126 cases of high-grade malignancy. Compared with the non-PCa group, the PCa patients showed a significantly older age ([68.40 ± 7.30] vs [72.80 ± 7.20] yr, P 0.05).@*CONCLUSIONS@#The PCPT risk score is valuable in predicting the risk of PCa in China, which may play a better role than the serum PSA level in screening PCa and avoid unnecessary prostate biopsy, though its advantage is not so obvious in identifying high-grade malignancy. A prediction tool needs to be established for evaluating the risk of PCa in the Chinese population.


Sujets)
Sujet âgé , Humains , Mâle , Facteurs âges , Asiatiques , Biopsie , Chine , , Toucher rectal , Prostate , Anatomopathologie , Antigène spécifique de la prostate , Sang , Tumeurs de la prostate , Sang , Anatomopathologie , Courbe ROC , Appréciation des risques , Méthodes , Facteurs de risque
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche