RÉSUMÉ
Objetivo: avaliar as desadaptações em supraestruturas de implantes e a curva de assinatura torque-ângulo dos parafusos protéticos nas condições monobloco e pós-soldagem. Material e métodos: uma base retangular de aço inox recebeu três implantes de hexágono externo (4,1 mm x 10 mm), onde foram parafusados minipilares de zircônia. Após o enceramento e inclusão, as supraestruturas foram fundidas em monobloco com uma liga de cobalto-cromo, e os cilindros foram numerados sequencialmente (1, 2 e 3). A leitura na interface supraestrutura/pilar foi realizada com um microscópio comparador (precisão de 1 µm), três vezes em cada cilindro. A tensão de torque nos parafusos foi medida com um torquímetro eletrônico odontológico (OsseoCare, Nobel Biocare). Depois, as supraestruturas foram seccionadas e soldadas a plasma (pontos de estabilização) e maçarico (preenchimento da área restante). Novamente, as desadaptações e assinaturas dos parafusos foram avaliadas pela mesma metodologia. Resultados: as médias de desadaptações foram maiores nas supraestruturas em monobloco (C1=3,5 µm; C2=0 µm; C3=31,2 µm) do que nas supraestruturas pós-soldagem (C1=3,0 µm; C2=2,9 µm; C3=18,1 µm). Dentro de cada condição, o teste de Kruskal-Wallis mostrou diferença estatisticamente significativa apenas para o cilindro 3 (monobloco: p < 0,00003 / pós-soldagem: p=0,008) em relação aos cilindros 1 e 2. Uma diferença estatisticamente significante foi encontrada apenas no C3, comparando as condições monobloco e pós-soldagem (teste t pareado, p=0,03). A assinatura dos parafusos se mostrou melhor na condição pós-soldagem. Conclusão: a fundição monobloco gera instabilidade na assinatura dos parafusos. A desadaptação nos parafusos protéticos de supraestruturas sobre minipilares de zircônia melhora após secção e soldagem híbrida.
Objective: to evaluate the misfi t at implant frameworks and the torque-angle signature curves at the prosthetic screws at one-piece and after soldering conditions. Material and methods: a stainless steel rectangular base received 3 external hex implants (4.1 x 10 mm) where zirconia mini-abutments were fastened. After wax-up and investing, the frameworks were one-piece cast with a Co-Cr alloy, and the prosthetic cylinders sequentially identified (1, 2, and 3). The misfit at the framework/abutment interface was measured with a microscope (reading error 1 µm) 3 times for each cylinder. The screw tension was investigated with an electronic torqued device (Osseocare, Nobel Biocare). After, the frameworks were sectioned and soldered with plasma (stabilization points) and gas torch (filling of the remaining areas). Again, the misfit and torque-angle signatures were measured as described. Results: mean misfit values were greater for one-piece castings (C1=3.5 µm; C2=0 µm; C3=31.2 µm) than after soldering (C1=3.0 µm; C2=2.9 µm; C3=18.1 µm). Within each condition, the Kruskal-Wallis test demonstrated a statistically significant difference only for C3 (one-piece casting: p < 0.00003 / after soldering: p=0.008) compared to C1 and C2. Between each condition, a significant difference was seen only for C3 in the one-piece and after soldering conditions (paired t test, p=0.03). The torque-angle signatures demonstrated a better behavior after soldering. Conclusion: one-piece castings provide instability at torque-angle signatures. Thus, the seating of the prosthetic abutments over the zirconia mini-abutments improves after sectioning and hybrid soldering.
Sujet(s)
Implants dentaires , Soudage dentaire/effets indésirables , Alliages métal céramique/effets indésirables , Moment de torsion , ZirconiumRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fit accuracy of two zirconia and titanium abutments in internal hexagonal implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One titanium abutment and two zirconia abutments were tested in internal hexagonal implants (TSV, Zimmer). Prefabricated zirconia abutments (ZirAce, Acucera) and customized zirconia abutments milled by the Zirkonzahn system (Zirkonzahn Max, Zirkonzahn) were selected and prefabricated titanium abutments (Hex-Lock, Zimmer) were used as a control. Eight abutments per group were connected to implants with 30 Ncm torque. The marginal gaps at abutment-implant interface, the internal gaps at internal hex, vertical and horizontal gaps between screws and screw seats in abutments were measured after sectioning the embedded specimens using a scanning electron microscope. Data analysis included one-way analysis of variance and the Scheffe test (n=16, α=0.05). RESULTS: The mean marginal gap of customized zirconia abutment was higher than those of two prefabricated zirconia and titanium abutments. The internal gaps at internal hex showed no significant differences between customized and prefabricated abutments and were higher than those of prefabricated titanium abutments. The mean vertical and horizontal gaps at screw in prefabricated zirconia abutment were higher than those of prefabricated titanium abutment. In the case of customized zirconia abutment, the mean horizontal gap at screw was higher than those of both the prefabricated zirconia and the titanium abutment but the mean vertical gap was not even measureable. The screw seats were clearly formed but did not match with abutment screws in prefabricated zirconia abutments. They were not, however, precisely formed in the case of customized zirconia abutments. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the prefabricated titanium abutments showed better fit than the zirconia abutments, regardless of customized or prefabricated. Also, the customized zirconia abutments showed significantly higher marginal gaps and the fit was less accurate between screws and screw seats than the prefabricated abutments, titanium and zirconia.
Sujet(s)
Statistiques comme sujet , Titane , Moment de torsionRÉSUMÉ
ABSTRACT. Introduction: some studies on the effect of zirconia aging mention a degree of reduction of zirconia′s fracture strength varying from 20 to 40%, while other authors argue that aging does not affect the material′s strength. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of a zirconia abutment subjected to static loads and artificial aging using the finite element method (FEM). Methods: modeling of the Tapered Screw- Vent implant and the zirconia Zimmer® abutment (Zimmer Dental1 900 Aston Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7308 USA). Four models were designed: one with an implant of 3.7 mm in diameter and a 3.5 mm diameter abutment, another with an implant of 4.7 mm in diameter and a 4.5 mm diameter abutment, and other two with the same dimensions but changing the final fracture limit to 40%, analyzing the response of different components to specific loads. Results: models subjected to decreases in zirconia abutment fracture strength did not show zirconia differences in terms of von Mises values. A factor of safety allowed observing the working threshold of the zirconia abutment; failure occurred at values lower than 1. Conclusions: by modifying zirconia′s properties in order to simulate aging, the factor of safety decreases at values lower than 1. However, the applied forces under which the safety factor decreases are higher than normal masticatory forces.
RESUMEN. Introducción: estudios sobre el efecto del envejecimiento de la circona refieren una disminución de la resistencia a la fractura de la circona que varía del 20 al 40%, mientras que otros argumentan que no influye en la resistencia del material. El propósito de este estudio fue evaluar la respuesta de un pilar de circona sometido a carga estática y envejecimiento artificial usando el método de elementos finitos (MEF). Métodos: se modelaron el implante Tapered Screw-Vent y el pilar de circona Zimmer® (Zimmer Dental1 900 Aston Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008- 7308 USA). Se diseñaron cuatro modelos: uno con implante de 3,7 de diámetro y pilar de 3,5 mm de diámetro, otro con un implante de 4,7 de diámetro y un pilar de 4,5 mm de diámetro, y otros dos con las mismas dimensiones pero modificando el limite último de fractura en un 40%. Se observó el comportamiento de los diferentes componentes ante la carga. Resultados: en los modelos donde se aplicó la disminución de la resistencia a la fractura del pilar de circona, no se observaron diferencias en la circona en cuanto a los valores de von Mises. Se generó un coeficiente de seguridad que permitió observar el umbral de trabajo del pilar de circona, a valores inferiores a 1 se presentó la falla. Conclusiones: al modificar las propiedades de la circona, para simular el envejecimiento, el factor de seguridad disminuye a valores inferiores a 1. Sin embargo, las fuerzas aplicadas bajo las cuales disminuye el factor de seguridad son superiores a las fuerzas de la masticación normal.
Sujet(s)
Analyse des éléments finis , Zirconium , LongévitéRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the fracture load of customized zirconia abutments with titanium insert according to preparation depths, with or without 5-year artificial aging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six identical lithium disilicate crowns (IPS e.max press) were fabricated to replace a maxillary right central incisor and cemented to the customized zirconia abutment with titanium insert on a 4.5x10 mm titanium fixture. Abutments were fabricated with 3 preparation depths (0.5 mm, 0.7 mm, and 0.9 mm). Half of the samples were then processed using thermocycling (temperature: 5-55degrees C, dwelling time: 120s) and chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycles, 49 N load). All specimens were classified into 6 groups depending on the preparation depth and artificial aging (non-artificial aging groups: N5, N7, N9; artificial aging groups: A5, A7, A9). Static load was applied at 135 degrees to the implant axis in a universal testing machine. Statistical analyses of the results were performed using 1-way ANOVA, 2-way ANOVA, independent t-test and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: The fracture loads were 539.28 +/- 63.11 N (N5), 406.56 +/- 28.94 N (N7), 366.66 +/- 30.19 N (N9), 392.61 +/- 50.57 N (A5), 317.94 +/- 30.05 N (A7), and 292.74 +/- 37.15 N (A9). The fracture load of group N5 was significantly higher than those of group N7 and N9 (P<.017). Consequently, the fracture load of group A5 was also significantly higher than those of group A7 and A9 (P<.05). After artificial aging, the fracture load was significantly decreased in all groups with various preparation depths (P<.05). CONCLUSION: The fracture load of a single anterior implant restored with lithium disilicate crown on zirconia abutment with titanium insert differed depending on the preparation depths. After 5-year artificial aging, the fracture loads of all preparation groups decreased significantly.
Sujet(s)
Vieillissement , Axis , Couronnes , Implants dentaires , Incisive , Modèles linéaires , Lithium , Mastication , TitaneRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the proper axial thickness of zirconia abutment applied to implant in the anterior region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Zirconia abutments were prepared at different axial wall thickness by processing pre-sintered zirconia blocks via CAD/CAM to obtain equal specimens. The abutments were each produced with a thickness of 0.5 mm (Group 1), 0.8 mm (Group 2), 1.2 mm (Group 3), or 1.5 mm (Group 4). The implant used in this study was a external connection type one (US, Osstem, Pussan, Korea) product and the zirconia abutment was prepared via replication of a cemented abutment. The crowns were prepared via CAM/CAM with a thickness of 1.5 mm and were cemented to the abutments using RelyX(TM) UniCem cement. A universal testing machine was used to apply load at 30 degrees and measure fracture strength of the zirconia abutment. RESULTS: Fracture strength of the abutments for Group 1, Group 2, Group 3, and Group 4 were 236.00 +/- 67.55 N, 599.00 +/- 15.80 N, 588.20 +/- 33.18 N, and 97.83 +/- 98.13 N, respectively. Group 1 showed a significantly lower value, as compared to the other groups (independent Mann-Whitney U-test. P.05). CONCLUSION: Zirconia abutment requires optimal thickness for fracture resistance. Within the limitation of this study, > 0.8 mm thickness is recommended for zirconia abutment in anterior implants.
Sujet(s)
CouronnesRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of resin cements and primer on the retentive force of zirconia copings bonded to zirconia abutments with insufficient retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Zirconia blocks (Lava, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) were obtained and forty sets of zirconia abutments and copings were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology. They were grouped into 4 categories as follows, depending on the types of resin cements used, and whether the primer is applied or not:Panavia F2.0 (P), Panavia F2.0 using Primer (PRIME Plus, Bisco Inc, Schaumburg, IL, USA) (PZ), Superbond C&B (S), and Superbond C&B using Primer (SZ). For each of the groups, the cementation was conducted. The specimens were kept in sterilized water (37degrees C) for 24 hours. Retentive forces were tested and measured, and a statistical analysis was carried out. The nature of failure was recorded. RESULTS: The means and standard deviations of retentive force in Newton for each group were 265.15 +/- 35.04 N (P), 318.21 +/- 22.24 N (PZ), 445.13 +/- 78.54 N (S) and 508.21 +/- 79.48 N (SZ). Superbond C&B groups (S & SZ) showed significantly higher retentive force than Panavia F2.0 groups (P & PZ). In Panavia F2.0 groups, the use of primer was found to contribute to the increase of retentive force. On the other hand, in Superbond C&B groups, the use of primer did not influence the retention forces. Adhesive failure was observed in all groups. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that cementation of the zirconia abutments and zirconia copings with Superbond C&B have a higher retentive force than Panavia F2.0. When using Panavia F2.0, the use of primer increases the retentive force.
Sujet(s)
Adhésifs , Cimentation , Main , Céments résine , 12571 , Eau , ZirconiumRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of abutment material on screw-loosening before and after cyclic loading. Among the different materials of abutments, zirconia and metal abutment were used. MATERIAL AND METHODS:: Two types of implant systems: external butt joint (US II, Osstem Implant, Korea) and internal conical joint (GS II, Osstem Implant, Korea) were used. In each type, specimens were divided into two different kinds of abutments: zirconia and metal (n = 5). The implant was rigidly held in a special holding to device ensure fixation. Abutment was connected to 30 Ncm with digital torque gauge, and was retightened in 30 Ncm after 10 minutes. The initial removal torque values were measured. The same specimens were tightened in 30 Ncm again and held in the cycling loading simulator (Instron, USA) according to ISO/FPIS 1480. Cycling loading tests were performed at loads 10 to 250 N, for 1 million cycles, at 14 Hz, (by subjecting sinusoidal wave from 10 to 250 N at a frequency of 14 Hz for 1 million cycles,) and then postload removal torque values were evaluated. RESULTS: 1. In all samples, the removal values of abutment screw were lower than tightening torque values (30 Ncm), but the phenomenon of the screw loosening was not observed. 2. In both of the implant systems, initial and postload removal torque of zirconia abutment were significantly higher than those of metal abutment (P .05). 4. In metal abutments, the removal torque ratio of GS II system (internal conical joint system) was lower than that of US II system (external butt joint system) (P .05). CONCLUSION: Zirconia abutment had a good screw joint stability in the condition of one million cycling loading.
Sujet(s)
Saccharose alimentaire , Articulations , Moment de torsion , ZirconiumRÉSUMÉ
The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the biological stability of the zirconia/alumina composite abutment by histologic and radiographic examination in clinical cases. 17 partially edentulous patients (5 men and 12 women, mean age 47) were treated with 37 implants. The implants were placed following the standard two-stage protocol. After a healing period of 3 to 6 months, zirconia/alumina composite abutments were connected. All radiographs were taken using paralleling technique with individually fabricated impression bite block, following insertion of the prosthesis and at the 3-, 6-, 12-month re-examinations. After processing the obtained images, the osseous level was calculated using the digital image in the mesial and distal aspect in each implant. An ANOVA and t-test were used to test for difference between the baseline and 3-, 6-, 12 months re-examinations, and for difference between maxilla and mandible. Differences at P 0.05). The mean bone level reduction in maxilla was 0.33(+/-0.25) at 3-months, 0.36(+/-0.33) at 6-months, 0.56(+/-0.26) at 12-months. And the mean bone level reduction in mandible was 0.35(+/-0.27) at 3-months, 0.49(+/-0.27) at 6-months, 0.68(+/-0.30) at 12-months. No statistical difference in bone level reduction between implants placed in the maxilla and mandible. Histologically, the height of the junctional epithelium was about 2.09 mm. And the width was about 0.51 mm. Scattered fibroblasts and inflammatory cells, and dense collagen network with few vascular structures characterized the portion of connective tissue. The inflammatory cell infiltration was observed just beneath the apical end of junctional epithelium and the area of direct in contact with zirconia/alumina abutment. These results suggest the zirconia/alumina composite abutment can be used in variable intraoral condition, in posterior segment as well as anterior segment without adverse effects.