Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis

ABSTRACT Purpose to investigate whether patients with lichen planus (LP) are really prone to urolithiasis or not. Patients and Methods We performed a prospective analysis of 40 patients diagnosed with lichen planus (LP) (group I), and 40 volunteers did not have LP before (group II). Participants were all checked for urolithiasis by radiological investigations. Blood samples were analyzed for biochemistry parameters including calcium and uric acid. 24-h urine samples were analyzed to investigate oxalate, citrate calcium, uric acid, magnesium, sodium and creatinine. Results Men/women ratio and mean age were similar between group I and II (p>0.05). A presence or history of urolithiasis was detected in 8 (20%) and 2 (%5) patients in group I and II, respectively (p<0.05). Hypocitraturia was the most common anomaly with 35% (n:14) in group I. The rate of hypocitraturia in group II was 12.5% (n:5) and the difference was statistically significantly different (p=0.036). In group I, hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria followed with rates of 27.5% (n:11) and 25% (n:10), respectively. The rate of hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria were both 5% (n:2) in group II and the differences were significant (p<0.05). Hyperuricemia was another important finding in the patients with LP. It was detected in 13 (32.5%) patients in group I and in 1 (2.5%) participant in group II (p=0.001). Conclusion According to our results, metabolic disorders of urolithiasis were highly detected in the patients with LP. However, similar to the etiology of LP, the exact reasons for these metabolic abnormalities in LP remain a mystery.

Detection of metabolic disorders in high-risk patients: a pilot study in Salvador, Bahia

The purpose of this pilot-study was to evaluate the applicability of a screening protocol for the detection of inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) in high-risk patients. The protocol was applied in 65 patients referred to the Medical Genetics Laboratory of the University Hospital Professor Edgard Santos due to the suspicion of an IEM. Eight of these patients (12.3 percent) displayed an abnormal result in the screening protocol. These patients, along with 22 who displayed normal results in the screening protocol but who presented clinical symptoms or signs suggestive of an IEM not detectable by the tests applied, were selected for a further diagnostic investigation. In 5 of these 30 patients (7.7 percent of the total sample) it was possible to establish the diagnosis of an specific IEM. The results indicate that the designed screening protocol was sucessfully applied, allowing the detection of affected patients in a frequency comparable to that observed in larger studies performed elsewhere. The continuation of this study and the enlargement of the sample will help to delineate the profile of IEM in northeast of Brazil and will allow the identification of a significative number of patients and families. who could benefit from the therapeutic and preventive measures available for these diseases.