Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Anest. analg. reanim ; 29(2): 18-30, dic. 2016. tab, ilus
Article Dans Espagnol | LILACS, BNUY, UY-BNMED | ID: biblio-949972

Résumé

Las inyecciones epidurales de esteroides son frecuentemente indicadas en el sindrome radicular lumbosacro, producido por hernias de disco, protrusiones discales o estenosis del canal, cuando éste no responde al tratamiento no intervencionista. Sin embargo, por distintas causas, aproximadamente 20% de los pacientes no responden a estas inyecciones, quedando pocas opciones terapéuticas disponibles. La radiofrecuencia pulsada del Ganglio de la Raíz Dorsal de las raíces afectadas es una alternativa válida para tratar el sindrome cuando es refractario al tratamiento con inyecciones epidurales de esteroides, en caso de que la cirugía de columna no está indicada o se prefiera evitar. Se presenta un caso clínico de un sindrome radicular lumbosacro refractario, causado por protrusiones discales lumbares, donde se utilizó la radiofrecuencia pulsada del ganglio de la raíz dorsal con buenos resultados, evaluados mediante el Inventario Abreviado del Dolor (Brief Pain Inventory).


Lumbosacral radicular syndrome, produced by discs herniations, discs protrusions or spinal stenosis is frequently treated by injecting steroids in the epidural space. However, 20% of the patients are resistant to this treatment, so few therapeutics options for them are left. Pulsed radiofrequency of the Dorsal Root Ganglion is a validated therapeutic option, when the syndrome is refractory to epidural steroid injections and spinal surgery is not indicated or elected. We report a clinical case of a lumbosacral radicular syndrome, refractory to epidural steroid injections, successfully treated with pulsed radiofrequency of lumbar Dorsal Root Ganglion, utilizing the Spanish version of the Brief Pain Inventory, as an outcome evaluation tool.


Sujets)
Humains , Radiculopathie/radiothérapie , Stéroïdes/usage thérapeutique , Lombalgie/radiothérapie , Traitement par radiofréquence pulsée , Ganglions sensitifs des nerfs spinaux/anatomopathologie , Région lombosacrale/anatomopathologie , Injections épidurales , Maladie chronique
2.
Arq. bras. neurocir ; 32(2)jun. 2013. ilus
Article Dans Portugais | LILACS | ID: lil-681381

Résumé

Objective: Evaluate clinical outcome of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment in neuropathic pain of patients with radiculopathy regarding improvement of pain and degree of patients? satisfaction. Method: Forty-five procedures in cervical and lumbossacral spine. Data collected by phone call interviews (independent researcher). Evaluation done after one month and at minimum three months follow-up. Analyzed data included objective and subjective improvement, and degree of satisfaction. Results: Outcome much better in 31%, 36% better, 24% unchanged, 9% worse. At initial evaluation, relief was rated: 24% excellent, 16% good, 27% moderate, 33% poor. At late evaluation, 27% excellent, 18% good, 7% moderate, 49% poor. Degree of satisfaction was high (82% of patients reported they certainly or probably would repeat the procedure). Conclusion: PRF was effective and safe in selected patients. Most patients were satisfied and would repeat/recommend the procedure...


Objetivo: Avaliar a evolução clínica do tratamento com radiofrequência pulsada (RFP) de gânglio da raiz dorsal (GRD) na dor neuropática em pacientes com radiculopatia, considerando melhora da dor e grau de satisfação dos pacientes. Método: Quarenta e cinco procedimentos na coluna cervical e lombossacra. Os dados foram coletados por meio de entrevistas telefônicas (pesquisador independente). Avaliação inicial feita após um mês e final no mínimo de três meses de acompanhamento. Dados analisados incluíram melhora objetiva, subjetiva e o grau de satisfação. Resultados: Evolução ?muito melhor? em 31%, ?melhor? em 36%, ?inalterado? em 24%, ?pior? em 9%. Na avaliação inicial: 24% ?excelente?, 16% ?bom?, 27% ?moderada?, 33% ?pobre?. Na avaliação final, 27% ?excelente?, 18% ?bom?, 7% ?moderada?, 49% ?pobre?. O grau de satisfação foi elevado (82% dos pacientes relataram que certamente ou provavelmente repetiriam o procedimento). Conclusão: RFP foi eficaz e segura em pacientes selecionados. A maioria dos pacientes ficou satisfeita e repetiu/recomendou o procedimento...


Sujets)
Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte , Adulte d'âge moyen , Douleur rebelle/radiothérapie , Ganglions sensitifs des nerfs spinaux , Radiculopathie/radiothérapie , Électrodes implantées
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche