Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrer
Plus de filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Rev. bras. pesqui. méd. biol ; Braz. j. med. biol. res;39(6): 749-758, June 2006. ilus
Article de Anglais | LILACS | ID: lil-428285

RÉSUMÉ

Invasive bacteria can induce their own uptake and specify their intracellular localization; hence it is commonly assumed that proximate modulation of host cell transcription is not required for infection. However, bacteria can also modulate, directly or indirectly, the transcription of many host cell genes, whose role in the infection may be difficult to determine by global gene expression. Is the host cell nucleus proximately required for intracellular infection and, if so, for which pathogens and at what stages of infection? Enucleated cells were previously infected with Toxoplasma gondii, Chlamydia psittaci, C. trachomatis, or Rickettsia prowazekii. We enucleated L929 mouse fibroblasts by centrifugation in the presence of cytochalasin B, and compared the infection with Shigella flexneri M90T 5a of nucleated and enucleated cells. Percent infection and bacterial loads were estimated with a gentamicin suppression assay in cultures fixed and stained at different times after infection. Enucleation reduced by about half the percent of infected cells, a finding that may reflect the reduced endocytic ability of L929 cytoplasts. However, average numbers of bacteria and frequency distributions of bacterial numbers per cell at different times were similar in enucleated and nucleated cells. Bacteria with actin-rich tails were detected in both cytoplasts and nucleated cells. Lastly, cytoplasts were similarly infected 2 and 24 h after enucleation, suggesting that short-lived mRNAs were not involved in the infection. Productive S. flexneri infection could thus take place in cells unable to modulate gene transcription, RNA processing, or nucleus-dependent signaling cascades.


Sujet(s)
Animaux , Souris , Cellules L (lignée cellulaire)/microbiologie , Shigella flexneri/croissance et développement , Cytochalasine B , Noyau de la cellule/microbiologie , Cytoplasme/microbiologie , Facteurs temps
3.
Acta bioquím. clín. latinoam ; Acta bioquím. clín. latinoam;26(3): 311-7, sept. 1992. ilus
Article de Espagnol | LILACS | ID: lil-124819

RÉSUMÉ

El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar tres métodos utilizados en el control de calidad de medios de cultivo: a)el método original de Miles-Mirsa; b)el ecométrico y c)el método de estrías. Para comparar estos métodos, se evaluaron la productividad (crecimiento de un microorganismo que habitualmente se desarrolla en un medio de cultivo) y la selectividad (supresión del crecimiento de un microorganismo, que se espera sea inhibido en un medio de cultivo) de seis medios sólidos de cultivo usados para el aislamiento de Salmonella spp. y Shigella spp. Los resultados que se obtuvieron al comparar los 3 métodos, mediante la prueba de Chi2, reflejan que existe diferencia significativa (p<0.05) entre el método de estrías y los otros 2 en lo referente a la productividad, no existiendo diferencia significativa entre los 3 métodos, en cuanto a selectividad. De los 3 métodos ensayados, el ecométrico resultó el de más fácil y rápida ejecución


Sujet(s)
Agar-agar , Milieux de culture/analyse , Techniques in vitro , Contrôle de qualité , Milieux de culture , Milieux de culture/classification , Escherichia coli/croissance et développement , Escherichia coli/isolement et purification , Salmonella typhimurium/croissance et développement , Salmonella typhimurium/isolement et purification , Salmonella typhi/croissance et développement , Salmonella typhi/isolement et purification , Shigella flexneri/croissance et développement , Shigella flexneri/isolement et purification , Staphylococcus aureus/croissance et développement , Staphylococcus aureus/isolement et purification
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE