Résumé
OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the characteristics of forensic clinical identification on common peroneal nerve injury in traffic accident.@*METHODS@#Eight cases of common peroneal nerve injury in traffic accidents were analyzed, including general condition of the wounded, the way of injury, the imaging results, the EMG results, and the degree of injury, etc.@*RESULTS@#In 8 cases, 2 cases of complete common peroneal nerve injury were determined to grade 9 (disability degree) and 6 cases of partial common peroneal nerve injury were determined to grade 10 (disability degree).@*CONCLUSION@#By comparison, the disability degree of complete common peroneal nerve injury is higher than that of partial common peroneal nerve injury. The forensic clinical identification of common peroneal nerve should be made with synthetical consideration of medical history, symptoms, and auxiliary examinations.
Sujets)
Adulte , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Accidents de la route , Répartition par âge , Évaluation de l'invalidité , Expertise , Fibula/traumatismes , Fractures osseuses/physiopathologie , Traumatismes de la jambe/physiopathologie , Nerf fibulaire commun/physiopathologie , Neuropathies des nerfs péroniers/physiopathologie , Radiographie , Indices de gravité des traumatismesRésumé
OBJECTIVE@#To analyze and compare different methods for assessment of the limbs joints function and to discuss the rationality of the methods.@*METHODS@#Eight hundred and six cases were collected from the Fujian Minzhong Forensic Appraisal Center from 2007 to 2010. These cases included injuries of large limbs joints with or without peripheral nerve injury. The loss of joint function was calculated according to the simple joint mobility method or the table method introduced in the book "Forensic Clinical Judicial Authentication Practice". The results of disability evaluation with different methods were analyzed and compared between different joints and injury patterns.@*RESULTS@#In 642 cases of simple joint injuries without peripheral nerve injury, the results of disability evaluation based on simple joint mobility were the same as that based on the table. In 118 cases of joint injuries with peripheral nerve injury, all of them could be classified as disability, 33 cases (28.00%) had higher degree based on the table method than based on the simple joint mobility method. While 21 cases (17.80%) did not be evaluated as disabled based on the simple joint mobility method.@*CONCLUSION@#The evaluation for loss of limb function would be easier, more scientific and reasonable by the direct table method than the simple joint mobility method.