Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery ; : 11-14, 2013.
Artigo em Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-221341

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is a common condition affecting infants that causes severe projectile non-bilious vomiting in the first few months of life. Although open pyloromyotomy is the standard treatment for HPS, recently, the laparoscopic approach has rapidly been adopted by pediatric surgeons. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy by comparing the clinical results of laparoscopic and open pyloromyotomy. METHODS: Between January 2007 and September 2012, a cohort of 69 children who underwent pyloromyotomy at Seoul National University Children's Hospital were followed; open pyloromyotomy (OP, n=56) and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (LP, n=13). A retrospective analysis of patient's characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients with open or laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for HPS was performed. The evaluated characteristics included gestational age, sex, birth weight, age and weight at operation. Clinical outcomes included operation time, length of hospital stay, time to postoperative full feeds without vomiting, number of postoperative vomiting and complications. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in characteristics, length of hospital stay and time to postoperative full feeds without vomiting between the two groups. Incidence of postoperative vomiting in the LP group was significantly lower than that in the OP group (OP: 5.07+/-4.60 vs. LP: 2.00+/-2.16, p=0.035). In contrast, the operation time was longer, following the LP group (OP: 26.30+/-9.95 vs. LP: 44.15+/-19.56, p0.999) and wound problems (OP: 4 vs. LP 1, p>0.999) were found to be similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both open and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy are safe procedures for the management of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Incidence of vomiting was statistically superior in the laparoscopic group. In addition, postoperative complications were fewer in this group. However, an improvement in the operation time will be needed for the future development of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.


Assuntos
Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Peso ao Nascer , Estudos de Coortes , Idade Gestacional , Incidência , Laparoscopia , Tempo de Internação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios , Estenose Pilórica Hipertrófica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vômito
2.
Journal of the Korean Society of Endoscopic & Laparoscopic Surgeons ; : 101-105, 2011.
Artigo em Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-84153

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a popular surgical treatment of choice for children with appendicitis. This study compared laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) with an open appendectomy (OA) in children with simple appendicitis (SA) and perforated appendicitis (PA) to confirm the safety and effectiveness of the laparoscopic procedure. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was performed on 193 patients who underwent an appendectomy at our institution from January, 2008 to August, 2011. The demographic properties and postoperative factors including complications were assessed. RESULTS: Among 140 SA, there were 81 and 59 cases of OA and LA, respectively. In SA, the time to bowel movement in LA was shorter than OA (0.9 vs. 1.2 days, p=0.0005) and the number of times analgesics were used in LA were significantly lower than OA (1.8 vs. 2.5, p=0.027). Of 53 PA, 30 cases received OA whereas 23 cases underwent LA. In patients with PA, the LA group were older (124.0 vs. 98.8 months, p=0.027) with a longer operative time (93.5 vs. 68.2 minutes, p=0.02). On the other hand, the time to diet was faster in LA (1.8 vs. 3.2 days, p=0.02). In both SA and PA, there were no significant differences between OA and LA with respect to gender, hospital stay, drain insertion, duration of antibiotics usage, and complications. In SA, the LA group had fewer complications than the OA group with borderline significance. CONCLUSION: LA is a safe and effective way to treat SA and PA in children.


Assuntos
Criança , Humanos , Analgésicos , Antibacterianos , Apendicectomia , Apendicite , Dieta , Mãos , Tempo de Internação , Prontuários Médicos , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA