RESUMO
The study compared the outcome of induction of labour with prostagl and in E2 vaginal tablets in patients with premature rupture of membranes [PROM] at term in different parity groups. A retrospective review was made of the hospital records of 169 women attending the maternity unit of King Faisal Military Hospital, Saudi Arabia. There were no statistically significant differences between the 3 groups [parity 0, parity 1-4 and parity 5+] in rates of labour augmentation, caesarean sections, neonatal intensive care admissions or low Apgar scores. There were no serious complications of induction of labour such as infection or uterine hyperstimulation or rupture. Prostagl and in E2 may be used with care for labour induction in women with PROM at term, even gr and ultiparas, unless there is history of previous caesarean delivery
Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Análise de Variância , Índice de Apgar , Peso ao Nascer , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais/terapia , Idade Gestacional , Idade Materna , Ocitócicos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
A retrospective, descriptive cohort study was conducted at King Faisal Military Hospital, Saudi Arabia, to compare pregnancy outcomes in patients induced with prostagl and in E2 from 41 weeks gestation. A total of 450 women whose antenatal care and delivery were conducted at the hospital during 1995-99 were studied. The main outcome measures used were caesarean section rate and perinatal morbidity and mortality. In otherwise normal pregnancies, the caesarean section rate was not significantly increased when induction of labour was carried out at 41 weeks gestation compared with >/=42 weeks. Although more perinatal complications occurred when induction was carried out at 42 weeks, the results were not statistically significant. A large prospective clinical trial is indicated