RESUMO
Background: Feet of diabetic persons are at a high risk of developing complications and their prevalence is very high. Uncontrolled diabetes i.e. hyperglycemia particularly chronic hyperglycemia plays the most critical role in developing all forms of macro and microvascular complications in foot. The 揾igh risk foot� can be identified by simple clinical examination. A structured screening program for 揌igh Risk Foot� integrated with all diabetic care units is essential. Objectives: The study was initiated to determine the frequency of 揾igh-risk foot� among Type 2 diabetic patients.Methods:It was a cross-sectional observational study, conducted among 324 Type 2 diabetic patients attending BIRDEM General Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. All participants were interviewed by an administered questionnaire, underwent clinical examination and review of medical records from the diabetic guide book of the patients and hospital records.Results:Among a total of 324 patients, 198(61%) patients were having high-risk feet. Of the diabetics with high risk foot- loss of protective sensation 73.2%; absent pedal pulse 23.2%; history foot ulcer 25.3%; limited joint mobility 15.2%; foot deformity 11.1% and previous foot amputation 3.5%. The study population had poor glycemic status (HbA1c 10.81+5.23%). Other variables age 55.43 (� 11.062) years; BMI: 25.33+5.7 kg/m� duration of diabetes 14.24+7.25 years; sex ratio (M: F) 1.3:1; family history of DM 71.9%; hypertensive 53.1%; smoker 73.5%; dislipidemia 52.8%, albuminuria 58.6%, and retinopathy 53.7%. Males are significantly higher in the high-risk foot.Conclusion:This study documented a very high frequency of high risks foot in our diabetic population. Peripheral Neuropathy (PN) and PVD are two common forms of high risk foot and these are influenced by a longer duration of diabetes, the presence of albuminuria for PN, and retinopathy. Male sex, longer duration of diabetes, presence of hypertension and smoking for PVD. Regular foot examination and treatment to target patients will modify the modifiable risk factors and thereby prevent foot ulcers and amputation.
RESUMO
Background: Practicing behavior of the physicians varies from population to population due to diverse socioeconomic, cultural, and professional factors. Evidence on these issues is almost nonexistent in the developing countries. Objective: The prescribing behavior of diabetes treating physicians working in selected hospitals of the Diabetic Association of Bangladesh was studied along with the factors affecting those behaviors. Materials and Methods: This was an observational study on 818 prescriptions given by 49 physicians working in 16 health care facilities, which were photocopied by a portable photocopier. The various components of the prescription were scrutinized for presence and absence, and evaluated independently by two expert Diabetologists for their qualitative aspects. Results: The mean ± standard deviation of the total prescribing score (expressed as percentage) was 60 ± 11. Physicians scoring around or below 60% belonged more to lower age (<40 years), less experienced (<7 years) and mid-position (Senior Medical Offi cers) groups. Most of them also had public medical college background. Physicians with Certifi cate Course on Diabetology (CCD) had signifi cantly higher score compared with the Non-CCD group (P < 0.001). Direction and duration of drug use were absent in majority of prescriptions (72.0% and 61.6%), respectively. Symptoms were not written in 78.0% and the family histories were not recorded in 98.5% prescriptions. Diet (49.4%) and exercise (51.0%) related advices were not mentioned in a large number of prescriptions. Appropriate change of drug (78.2%) and proper use of drug (99.1%) and brand (93.8%) were found rational, but still, 22.4% of the prescriptions found illegible. Conclusion: A large proportion of prescriptions in Bangladesh related to diabetes care still lack standardization and acceptable quality. Nondrug related issues (such as history, symptoms, and dietary/exercise-related advices) are the most neglected ones in a prescription.