Abnormal chest X-ray postmyocardial infarction

Pulmonary hemorrhage is a rare complication of fibrinolytic therapy. Only a few cases are reported in the literature. We present a patient who had myocardial infarction, treated with fibrinolytic therapy and developed pulmonary hemorrhage. We discuss the features that suggest and support the diagnosis

Are acute coronary syndrome patients admitted during off-duty hours treated differently? an analysis of the Saudi Project for assessment of acute coronary syndrome [space] study

It is often suggested that acute coronary syndrome [ACS] patients admitted during off-duty hours [OH] have a worse clinical outcome than those admitted during regular working hours [RH]. Our objective was to compare the management and hospital outcomes of ACS patients admitted during OH with those admitted during RH. Prospective observational study of ACS patients enrolled in the Saudi Project for Assessment of Acute Coronary Syndrome study from December 2005 to December 2007. ACS patients with available date and admission times were included. RH were defined as weekdays, 8 AM-5 PM, and OH was defined as weekdays 5 PM-8 AM, weekends, during Eid [a period of several days marking the end of two major Islamic holidays], and national days. Of the 2825 patients qualifying for this analysis, 1016 [36%] were admitted during RH and 1809 [64%] during OH. OH patients were more likely to present with heart failure and ST elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] and to receive fibrinolytic therapy, but were less likely to undergo primary percutaneous coronary interventions [PCI]. The median door to balloon time was significantly longer [P<.01] in OH patients [122 min] than in RH patients. No differences were observed in hospital outcomes including mortality between the two groups, except for higher heart failure rates in OH patients [11.1% vs 7.2%, P<.001]. STEMI patients admitted during OH were disadvantaged with respect to use and speed of delivery of primary PCI but not fibrinolytic therapy. Hospitals providing primary PCI during OH should aim to deliver it in a timely manner throughout the day

Incidence of ventricular arrhythmia and associated patient outcomes in hospitalized acute coronary syndrome patients in Saudi Arabia: findings from the registry of the Saudi Project for Assessment of Acute Coronary Syndrome [SPACE]

Mortality in acute coronary syndrome [ACS] patients with ventricular arrhythmia [VA] has been shown to be higher than those without VA. However, there is a paucity of data on VA among ACS patients in the Middle Eastern countries. Prospective study of patients admitted in 17 government hospitals with ACS between December 2005 and December 2007. Patients were categorized as having VA if they experienced either ventricular fibrillation [VF] or sustained ventricular tachycardia [VT] or both. Of 5055 patients with ACS enrolled in the SPACE registry, 168 [3.3%] were diagnosed with VA and 151 [98.8%] occurred in-hospital. The vast majority [74.4%] occurred in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. In addition, males were twice as likely to develop VA than females [OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1- 3]. Killip class >I [OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.3-3.1]; and systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg [OR 6.4; 95% CI 3.5-11.8] were positively associated with VA. Those admitted with hyperlipidemia [OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.3-0.7] had a lower risk of developing VA. Adverse in-hospital outcomes including re-myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, congestive heart failure, major bleeding, and stroke were higher for patients with VA [P?.01 for all variables] and signified a poor prognosis. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in VA patients compared with non-VA patients [27% vs 2.2%; P=.001]. In-hospital VA in Saudi patients with ACS was associated with remarkably high rates of adverse events and increased in-hospital mortality. Using a well-developed registry data with a large number of patients, our study documented for the first time the prevalence and risk factors of VA in unselected population of ACS

Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes: Results of the Saudi project for assessment of coronary events [SPACE] registry

The Saudi Project for Assessment of Coronary Events [SPACE] registry is the first in Saudi Arabia to study the clinical features, management, and in-hospital outcomes of acute coronary syndrome [ACS] patients. We conducted a prospective registry study in 17 hospitals in Saudi Arabia between December 2005 and December 2007. ACS patients included those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina; both were reported collectively as NSTEACS [non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome]. 5055 patients were enrolled with mean age +/- SD of 58 +/- 12.9 years; 77.4% men, 82.4% Saudi nationals; 41.5% had STEMI, and 5.1% arrived at the hospital by ambulance. History of diabetes mellitus was present in 58.1%, hypertension in 55.3%, hyperlipidemia in 41.1%, and 32.8% were current smokers; all these were more common in NSTEACS patients, except for smoking [all P < 0.0001]. In-hospital medications were: aspirin [97.7%], clopidogrel [83.7%], beta-blockers [81.6%], angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers [75.1%], and statins [93.3%]. Median time from symptom onset to hospital arrival for STEMI patients was 150 min [IQR: 223], 17.5% had primary percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], 69.1% had thrombolytic therapy, and 14.8% received it at less than 30 min of hospital arrival. In-hospital outcomes included recurrent myocardial infarction [1.5%], recurrent ischemia [12.6%], cardiogenic shock [4.3%], stroke [0.9%], major bleeding [1.3%]. In-hospital mortality was 3.0%. ACS patients in Saudi Arabia present at a younger age, have much higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, less access to ambulance use, delayed treatment by thrombolytic therapy, and less primary PCI compared with patients in the developed countries. This is the first national ACS registry in our country and it demonstrated knowledge-care gaps that require further improvements