Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 718-723, 2020.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-817552

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE:To provide reference for improving the level of pediatric pharmacoeconomic research in China. METHODS: Using “Pediatric”“Pharmacoeconomics”“Cost-effectiveness”“Cost-utility”“Cost-benefit”“Minimum cost ” as keywords,pediatric pharmacoeconomic research literatures published during Jan. 2009 to Dec. 2018 were retrieved from CNKI , Wanfang,VIP and CBMdisc. The Pediatric Quality Appraisal Questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of the literatures. The problems of these literatures were analyzed to put forward the suggestions. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS :Totally 140 literatures were eventually included. The number of published literatures was increasing and the distrubtion of journals was scattered. The first auther was mainly from medical institutions. Included literatures mainly involved respiratory disease and drug treatment ,etc. Among them ,15 literatures indicated the research angle ;research time limit of 109 literatures was equal to or less than one year ;6 literatures carried out sensitivity analysis. Most of them adopted cost-effectiveness analysis and decision analysis model. The results of quality evaluation showed that the economic evaluation ,camparators,target population ,outcomes,analysis and conclusions domains had high scores (0.62 to 1.00 score),time horizon and discounting domains had middle scroes (0.49 and 0.53 score respectively),but perspective ,costs and resource use ,incremental analysis ,sensitivity analysis and conflict of intrest domains had low scores (0.10 to 0.31 score). The main problems of pediatric pharmacoeconomic literatures in China focused on selection of research perspective ,measurement of costs and clinical outcomes ,and selection of analytical methods. The quality of pediatric pharmacoeconomic evaluations in China need to improve. It is suggested to supplement the content of pediatric pharmacoeconomics in China Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations . It is also suggested for pediatric pharmacoeconomic evaluations to clarify the perspective ,standardize the cost identification ,reasonably select health outcome indicators and correctly apply analysis method in order to improve the quality.

2.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 3287-3292, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-817432

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore the current situation of service ability and pharmaceutical service construction of primary healthcare institutions in Jiangsu province. METHODS: Questionnaire survey was conducted among primary healthcare institutions of 13 prefecture level cities in Jiangsu province, involving basic service information (such as serving mode, medical departments), resource allocation (such as hardware, human resource) and pharmaceutical care construction (such as the leaders of the drug procurement, pharmaceutical departments allocation, mediation safety management). The current situation of service ability and pharmaceutical service construction was evaluated in primary healthcare institutions of Jiangsu province. RESULTS: A total of 579 primary healthcare institutions in Jiangsu province were investigated and 579 questionnaires were collected (some items in the questionnaires were not answered). Outpatient service (543/555,97.8%) was the main mode of service provided by primary healthcare institutions in Jiangsu province, followed by emergency call (321/555,57.8%) and hospitalization (292/555,52.6%); the frequently established department in primary healthcare institutions was the medical department for all (452/568,79.6%), preventive healthcare department(401/568,70.6%), internal medicine department (365/568,64.3%); 16.1% (93/533)of the primary healthcare institutions had no beds; 36.4% (211/579)of the institutions had no chief physician; 20.9% (111/532)of the primary healthcare institutions medicine procurement were managed by pharmacists; 42.5% (212/499)of the institutions had no pharmaceutical departments; physicians were responsible for patients' medication safety in 43.9% (236/537) of the primary healthcare institutions and pharmacists were responsible for patients' medication safety in only 16.2% (87/537)of the institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Primary healthcare institutions in Jiangsu province have made some achievements in service capability building. Human resources, equipment and facilities, pharmaceutical care construction and other aspects still need to be improved.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA