RESUMO
Systematic observation is an indispensable tool in clinical neurology evaluation, but data organization and record are extensive and time-consuming, requiring method and training. Reliable scales facilitate this task and technology can be decisive in the implementation of observational data routines. In this study, we aimed to show the experience of a software development to optimize the application of a clinical observational scale. For this proposal it was necessary to consider the needs of the target population, text and image storing and reports generation, using computers with basic configuration, questionnaires and the measurement of time. The software allowed significant reduction in evaluation time and favored the cost-benefit of the task. The proposed methodology was adequate for this type of study.
RESUMO
Determinar a responsividade do domínio subir e descer escada da escala de avaliação funcional em distrofia muscular de Duchenne (DMD), no período de um ano. Método: Participaram do estudo 26 pacientes com DMD. A análise utilizou o Tamanho do Efeito (ES) e a Média Padronizada de Resposta (SRM). Resultados: Atividade de subir escada: o ES mostrou responsividade baixa nos intervalos de avaliação de 3 meses (0,26; 0,35; 0,13; 0,17), baixa a moderada em 6 meses (0,58, 0,48; 0,33), moderada em 9 meses (0,70; 0,68) e alta em 1 ano (0,88). A análise com SRM mostrou responsividade baixa nos intervalos de avaliação de 3 meses (0,29; 0,38; 0,18 e 0,19), baixa a moderada em intervalos de 6 meses (0,59 e 0,51, 0,36), moderada em 9 meses (0,74 e 0,70) e alta em 1 ano (0,89). Atividade de descer escada: O ES apresentou responsividade baixa nos intervalos de avaliação de 3 meses (0,16; 0,25; 0,09; 0,08) e 6 meses (0,48; 0,35; 0,18), baixa a moderada em 9 meses (0,59, 0,44) e moderada em 1 ano (0,71). Análise com SRM mostrou responsividade baixa nos intervalos de 3 meses (0,25; 0,35; 0,12 e 0,09) e 6 meses (0,47; 0,38 e 0,21), moderada a baixa em 9 meses (0,62, 0,49) e moderada em 1 ano (0,74). Conclusão: A avaliação da atividade de subir escada, por meio da FES-DMD-D3, deve ser realizada em intervalos a partir de 9 meses, pois a responsividade é de moderada a alta. A avaliação do descer escadas deve ser realizada anualmente, pois houve responsividade moderada somente a partir de 12 meses...
To determine the responsiveness of the domain up and down stair Functional Evaluation Scale for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) in one year follow-up. Method: The study included 26 patients with DMD. The analysis used the Effect Size (ES) and Standardized Response Mean (SRM) tests. Results: Climbing stairs activity: the ES test showed low responsiveness in the 3-month evaluation intervals (0.26; 0.35; 0.13; 0.17), low to moderate at 6 months (0.58, 0 48; 0.33), moderate in 9 months (0.70, 0.68) and high in one year (0.88). The SRM analysis showed low response in the 3 month evaluation interval (0.29, 0.38, 0.18 and 0.19), moderate to low every 6 months (0.59 and 51, 0, 36), moderate in 9 months (0.74 and 0.70) and high in one year (0.89). Down stairs activity: The ES test showed low responsiveness in the 3 month evaluation intervals (0.16; 0.25; 0.09; 0.08) and 6 months (0.48, 0.35, 0, 18), low to moderate at 9 months (0.59, 0.44) and moderate in 1 year (0.71). SRM Analysis showed low response at intervals of 3 months (0.25; 0.35; 0.12 and 0.09) and 6 months (0.47, 0.38 and 0.21), low to moderate 9 months (0.62, 0.49) and moderate in 1 year (0.74). Conclusion: The assessment of stair climbing up should be performed in 9 months or longer intervals, when responsiveness is moderate to high. Going down stairs assessment should be performed annually, because moderate responsiveness was observed in 1 year interval...