In-vitro efficacy of two spectrophotometer-based shade matching systems for color matching of ceramics after artificial accelerated aging / Eficácia in vitro de dois espectrofotômetros baseados em escalas de cor para avaliação de cor de cerâmicas após envelhecimento artificial acelerado

Objective: The objective of the present in-vitro study was to verify the efficacy of two spectrophotometer-based shade matching systems for color matching of ceramics after artificial accelerated aging (AAA). Material and Methods: The ceramics used were porcelain laminated veneers. Seventy standard-shaped discs (thickness x diameter: 0.5 mm x 10 mm) of B1 shades were used. Based upon the type of resin cement used, the specimens were divided into seven groups (10/group). The following light-cured cements were used: RelyX-Veneer (L-RV), Variolink-Veneer (L-VV), and Variolink-Esthetic (L-VE). The dual-cured cements were: RelyX Ultimate (D-RU), RelyX-Unicem (D-RC), and Variolink-Esthetics DC (D-VE). The control group consisted of ceramic only. All specimens were thermocycled in water for 3,500 cycles between 5 oC -55 oC, with dwell times of 30 s in each bath and a transfer time of 10 s between baths. All specimens were thermocycled in water for 3,500 cycles between 5 oC and 55 oC, and color measurement was done using the VITA Easyshade and ColorEye spectrophotometers. Baseline color reading was performed 24-hours after cementation. Differences in color (DE) of EasyShade and ColorEye before and after AAA were determined and compared statistically. Group comparisons were done using the paired t-tests. Level of significance was set at P< 0.05. Results: The mean differences in color (ΔE) values obtained from EasyShade spectrophotometer for light- and dual-cured cements, were 0.843±0.89 (L-RV ), 4.11±0.69 (L-VV) and 0.833±0.47 (L-VE); and 2.22±0.64 (D-RU), 3.37±0.83 (D-RC) and 0.38±0.92 (D-VE), respectively. The mean differences in color (ΔE) values obtained from ColorEye spectrophotometer for light- and dual-cured cements, were 0.68±0.86 (L-RV ), 4.55±0.83 (L-VV) and 2.68±0.26 (L-VE); and 2.06±0.84 (D-RU), 1.8±1.08 (D-RC) and 0.96±0.71 (D-VE), respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean DE values among the groups. Conclusion: The VITA Easyshade and ColorEye shade matching systems are comparable in terms of their efficacy for color matching of cerammics after AAA.(AU)

Objetivos: O objetivo do presente estudo in vitro foi verificar a eficácia de dois espectrofotômetros baseados em escalas de cor para avaliação de cor de cerâmicas após envelhecimento artificial acelerado (EAA). Material e Métodos: As cerâmicas utilizadas foram laminados cerâmicos. Foram usados setenta discos de formato padrão (0,5mm de espessura x 10 mm de diâmetro) de tonalidades B1. Com base no tipo de cimento resinoso utilizado, os corpos-de-prova foram divididos em sete grupos (10 / grupo). Foram utilizados os seguintes cimentos fotopolimerizáveis: RelyX-Veneer (L-RV), Variolink-Veneer (L-VV) e Variolink-Esthetic (L-VE). Os cimentos de cura dual foram: RelyX Ultimate (D-RU), RelyX-Unicem (D-RC) e Variolink-Esthetics DC (D-VE). O grupo controle consistia apenas de cerâmica. Todos os corpos-de-prova foram termociclados em água por 3.500 ciclos entre 5oC-55oC, com tempos de permanência de 30s em cada banho e um tempo de transferência de 10s entre os banhos. A medição da cor foi feita usando os espectrofotômetros VITA Easyshade e ColorEye. A leitura da cor inicial foi realizada 24 horas após a cimentação. As diferenças na cor (ΔE) do EasyShade e ColorEye antes e depois do EAA foram determinadas e comparadas estatisticamente. As comparações dos grupos foram feitas usando o teste t pareados. O nível de significância foi estabelecido em p <0,05. Resultados: os valores médios de diferenças na cor (ΔE) obtidos no espectrofotômetro EasyShade para cimentos fotopolimerizáveis e duais foram de 0,843 ± 0,89 (L-RV), 4,11 ± 0,69 (L-VV) e 0,833 ± 0,47 (L-VE ); e 2,22 ± 0,64 (D-RU), 3,37 ± 0,83 (D-RC) e 0,38 ± 0,92 (D-VE), respectivamente. os valores médios de diferenças na cor (ΔE) obtidos no espectrofotômetro ColorEye para cimentos fotopolimerizáveis e duais foram de 0,68 ± 0,86 (L-RV), 4,55 ± 0,83 (L-VV) e 2,68 ± 0,26 (L-VE); e 2,06 ± 0,84 (D-RU), 1,8 ± 1,08 (D-RC) e 0,96 ± 0,71 (D-VE), respectivamente. Não houve diferença significativa nos valores médios de ΔE entre os grupos. Conclusão: Os sistemas de combinação de cores VITA Easyshade e ColorEye são comparáveis em termos de eficácia para avaliação de cores de cerâmicas após EAA. (AU)

The effect of surface treatment and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneering material cemented with different luting cements

Aim: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of different surface treatment and thermocycling on the shear bond strength (SBS) of different dual-/light-cure cements bonding porcelain laminate veneers (PLV). Methods: One hundred and twenty A2 shade lithium disilicate discs were divided into three groups based on the resin cement used and on the pretreatment received and then divided into two subgroups: thermocycling and control. The surface treatment were either micro-etched with aluminium trioxide and 10% hydrofluoric acid or etched with 10% hydrofluoric acid only before cementation. Three dual-cure (Variolink Esthetic (I), RelyX Ultimate (II), and RelyX Unicem (III)) and three light-cure (Variolink Veneer (IV), Variolink Esthetic (V), RelyX Veneer (VI)) resin cements were used for cementation. The SBS of the samples was evaluated and analysed using three -way ANOVA with statistical significant set at α=0.05. Results: For all resin cements tested with different surface treatments, there was a statistically significant difference within resin cements per surface treatment (p<0.05). The shear bond strength in the micro-etch group was significant higher than the acid-etch group (p<0.05) There was statistically significant interaction observed between the surface treatment and thermocycling (p<0.05) as well as the cement and thermocycling(p<0.05). It was observed that the reduction in shear bond strength after thermocycling was more pronounced in the acid etch subgroup as compared to the microetch subgroup. However, the interaction between the three factors: surface treatments, thermocycling and resin cements did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between and within groups (p=0.087). Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, it acan be concluded that Dual cure resin cements showed a higher Shear bond strength as compared to light cure resin cements. Thermal cycling significantly decreased the shear bond strength for both ceramic surface treatments. After thermocycling, the specimens with 10% HF surface treatment showed lower shear bond strength values when compared to those treated by sandblasting with Al2O3 particles