Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-44916

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Refractory status epilepticus (RSE), defined as status epilepticus that fails to respond to first, second and third-line therapy. The RSE is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Treatment guidelines of RSE give a spectrum of options, such as, continuous intravenous (i.v.) midazolam (MDL), or continuous i.v. propofol (PRO) as alternatives to phenobarbital (PB) or continuous i.v. pentobarbital (PTB). OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of very-high-dose phenobarbital (VHDPB) for treatment RSE. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study MATERIAL AND METHOD: The authors collected and analyzed data from adult patients who were diagnosed with RSE. RESULTS: The authors present 10 patients with RSE who were treated with VHDPB. All of them were generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE). Ages ranged from 16-86 years old (mean.: 43 years). PB dosage ranged 40-140 mg/kg/day (mean: 70 mg/kg/day). The duration of status epilepticus (SE) varied widely, ranged 1-44 days (mean: 7 days). PB level ranged 35.29-218.34 ug/mL (mean 88.1 ug/mL). RSE was controlled by VHDPB 70%, 30% were not controlled. ConclusioN: VHDPB were considered as alternative treatment for RSE.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticonvulsivantes/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenobarbital/administração & dosagem , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estado Epiléptico/tratamento farmacológico , Falha de Tratamento
2.
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-41640

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The medical students' knowledge about basic medical neuroscience in the preclinical level may be fragmented and incomplete. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the knowledge of students prior to a lecture on epilepsy in clinical level. MATERIAL AND METHOD: One hundred ten fourth-year medical students' knowledge was accessed by a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: The presented results revealed that 91.8% of respondents knew that epilepsy arose from a transient dysfunction in the brain. Generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCs) were the most common type (91.5%) they knew and absence seizures were the least common type (33.6%) they knew. All of them knew that eating pork and punishment of gods did not cause epilepsy. However 50% thought that genetics was a cause and 80.3% did not know that stroke and sleep deprivation (92.7%) cause epilepsy. About treatment and prognosis, only 28.2% of respondents thought epilepsy can be cured and patients should take antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for seizure free 2-5 years (48.2%), life long (33.6%). They knew that the patients should be prohibited from driving (80%), working on machinery (74.5%), and (27.3%) avoid drinking. However, they knew that the patients could marry (100%), get pregnant (98.2%), and lactate (91.9%). Regarding the first aid management, 50.9% of them recommended that placing a piece of wood between the teeth during a seizure and perform chest compressions (20.0%). Means knowledge scores is about 60%, the highest score is the definition of epilepsy (90.2%) and the lowest is type of seizure (43%). CONCLUSION: The findings indicated that lecturers should review aspects ofpathophysiology and emphasize on type of seizure, cause, consequences, and prognosis including first-aid management.


Assuntos
Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Coleta de Dados , Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Risco , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Estudantes de Medicina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA