Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Bulletin of Alexandria Faculty of Medicine. 2008; 44 (1): 97-107
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-86015

RESUMO

Radiotherapy is often the primary treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, but the optimal fractionation schedule has been controversial. The aim of this study was to examine whether, after preceeding induction chemotherapy, hyperfractionated radiotherapy [HFRT] is superior to conventional fractionated radiotherapy [CFRT]. Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with three cycles of cisplatin [100 mg/m[2] D1] and 5-fluorouracil [1000 mg/m[2] D1-4], repeated every 3 weeks. Then patients were randomized to receive either CFRT at 1.8-2 Gy/fraction /day, 5 day/week to 65-70 Gy/33- 35 fractions/7 weeks or HFRT at 1.2 Gy /fraction, twice daily with a 6-hours interfraction interval, 5 days/week to 76.8 Gy/64 fractions/7 weeks. All patients in both treatment arms received concomitant chemotherapy in the form of weekly bolus injection of cisplatin [20mg/m[2]]. Of the 60 patients entered, only 53 patients were evaluable for outcomes. The primary end points were local control and progression- free survival. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, the overall response rate after induction chemotherapy was 73.6%, including 13.2% complete response rate. After completion of radiotherapy, patients treated with HFRT had an overall response rate of 96.2% versus 77.8% in CFRT [P= 0.04] and complete response rate of 65.4% in HFRT versus 40.7% in CFRT [P=0.01]. After a median follow- up of 28 months, overall survival was 57.7% in HFRT versus 44.4% in CFRT [P= 0.07]. The 2-year progression-free survival was 44% in HFRT versus 23.8% in CFRT [P=0.03]. The 2- year locoregional control was significantly higher in HFRT [58.8%] than those with CFRT [36.4%] [P=0.02]. The incidence of local recurrence rate was 41.2% in HFRT versus 63.6% in CFRT [P=0.02]. However, the incidence of distance metastases was 7.7% in HFRT versus 11.1% in CFRT [P=0.4]. Patients treated with HFRT had significantly greater acute side effects compared to CFRT. However, there was no significant increase of late effects. After induction chemotherapy, hyperfractionated radiotherapy is more efficaceous than conventional fractionated radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer. Acute but not late effects are increased, but it is tolerable and manageable


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Fumar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Radioterapia , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Intervalo Livre de Doença
2.
Medical Journal of Cairo University [The]. 2004; 72 (1): 119-32
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-67572

RESUMO

A retrospective analysis of 291 eligible patients with carcinoma of rectum and rectosigmoid was undertaken. The patients were assigned to one of four treatment groups: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy [CRT], followed by postoperative chemotherapy [POCT], postoperative radiotherapy [PORT], postoperative chemotherapy [POCT] and postoperative CRT. The results showed that with a median follow up of 57.2 months, the 5-year overall survival was 47.8%, the 5-year DFS was 42.4%. The 5-year OS was 48.3% in the preoperative CRT group, 42.4% in PORT group, 34.3% for POCT group and 55% in the POCRT group. The 5-year DFS was 44.8%, 39.4%, 31.5% and 50% in the four treatment groups, respectively. Local failure [LF] occurred in 14.1% of the patients and distant metastasis [DM] was observed in 28.9%


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Taxa de Sobrevida , Seguimentos , Resultado do Tratamento , Falha de Tratamento , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Retais/classificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA