Barriers to changing dietary behavior.

Dietary change requires giving up long established patterns of eating behavior and acquiring new habits. 'Non-compliance' to diet advice may be a result of inability to provide diet self-management training and getting the right messages across to change eating behavior. Using a pre-tested questionnaire based interview, we carried out a study amongst 350 adults (> 20 years) with type 2 diabetes from two metro cities in South India, who had previously received diet advice with the objective to understand perceptions, attitudes and practices, as well as study factors that enhance or reduce compliance to diet advice. Ninety six patients (28%) followed diet for the full duration of diabetes (Group1), 131 (38%) followed diet for a partial duration varying between more than a quarter to three quarters of the total diabetes duration (Group 2) and 115 (34%) did not follow diet advice (Group 3) - followed for a duration less than a quarter of their diabetes duration. Study results show that many factors both patient and health care provider related influence outcomes of dietary advice. Factors that have a positive impact on compliance are - older age, shorter duration, nuclear family, good family support, less busy work life, higher health consciousness, advice given by dietician, more frequent visits to dietician, advice that includes elements to promote overall health not merely control of blood sugar, diet counseling that is easy to understand and use and includes healthy food options, cooking methods, practical guidance to deal with lifestyle issues. We conclude that patient barriers related to life circumstance are mostly non-modifiable, most modifiable barriers are related to behavioural aspect and the inability of the health care provider to provide individualized diet advice and self management training. Efforts must be made to improve counseling skills.

Designer insulins regimens in clinical practice--pilot multicenter Indian study.

BACKGROUND: Newer insulin analogues viz., premix insulin analogue (biphasic insulin aspart) and insulin glargine are now available in India. A multicenter all-India study was done to document the patient profile and responses to these analogues in routine clinical practice. METHODS: The study was conducted prospectively at 4 diabetes care clinics in different regions of India and collected data on the use of either of the two regimens A. Premix insulin analogue given twice-daily B. Basal-bolus analogue regimen (insulin aspart with every meal and insulin glargine once-a-day at bedtime). The centers collected all data at 3 time-points--baseline, 4 weeks later and end of 12 weeks. The study measures were FPG (fasting plasma glucose), PPPG (postprandial plasma glucose), HbA1c and insulin dose. FPG and PPPG were recorded at each of the three time points. HbA1c was recorded at baseline and end of study. Safety was assessed based on reported adverse drug reactions and occurrence of hypoglycaemias. RESULTS: Data of 145 patients was available for analysis (n=114 on premix insulin analogue and n=31 on basal-bolus analogue regimen). Baseline demography was comparable in the two groups. Both the regimens lowered all blood glucose parameters including HbA1c significantly as compared to baseline. However, the premix insulin analogue fared better than the basal-bolus regimen in lowering HbA1c (1.58 vs. 1.16% respectively; p<0.05). Also 41% more patients in the premix group could achieve target HbA1c of < 7% at the end of study. The mean insulin dose was lower with the premix analogue group at the end of 12 weeks. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of change in body weight. No major hypoglycaemias were reported and the percentage of patients experiencing a minor episode was lower with the premix analogue than the basal-bolus regimen both at 4 and 12 weeks (11.4 vs. 35.48%; 16.7 vs. 58.06% respectively). No adverse drug reactions were reported throughout the study. CONCLUSION: We conclude that both premix analogue administered twice a day and four times a day basal bolus regimen appear to be a convenient, safe and effective way of initiating insulin therapy in people with type-2 diabetes. The premix analogues achieves target better than the basal bolus regimen as has better compliance.