An Evaluation of The Bio Compatibility of Grade 1 Commercial Pure Titanium For Orthodontic Implants.

The future of orthodontic and prosthodontic research will involve replacement materials and methods that evaluate compatibility of the materials to living tissues. The biocompatibility of grade1 comercially pure titanium is examined by using cytotoxic study. The extraction liquid of test implant material resulted from incubation in the medium at 37degree Celsius for 120 hours. Cells used are rhesus monkey fibroblasts and the experimental alloy did not cause any cytopathic changes in VERO cells.

"Evaluation And Comparison of Surface Modifications of Commercially Pure Grade -1 Titanium By Combination Technique of Blasting With Alumina Followed By Acid Etching And Oxidation With Naoh".

The aim of this study is evaluate two different techniques of modification of titanium surface and to compare the surface roughness levels, surface wettability and surface configuration of variously treated surfaces of titanium (commercially pure titanium grade I). Commercially pure titanium (Grade I) sheets of 0.2mm thick and 4.5mm diameter are used for this study. Blasting of titanium with Alumina, combined with Acid etching using Hydrofluoric acid, Hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid. And Oxidation treatment is done with Sodium hydroxide, Surface roughness levels were measured with the help of surface profilometer and surface analyzer. Surface wettability is measured with help of contact angle measurement using light microscope and surface configuration was determined with the help of scanning electron microscopy. Scanning electron microscopic studies concluded that samples with alumina blasting followed by acid etching revealed uniform rough configuration of the surface.

Evaluation And Comparison of Mechanical And Chemical Surface Modifications of Commercial Titanium For Orthodontic Implants .

Objective: The study evaluated two different methods of modification of titanium surface by blasting with various materials and by acid etching with different acids and to compare the surface roughness levels, surface wettability and surface configuration of variously treated surfaces of titanium. Materials and methods: Commercially pure titanium (Grade I) sheets of 0.2mm thick and 4.5mm diameter are used for this study. Blasting of the titanium substrates with various blasting materials is done using Alumina, Hydroxyapatite, and Tricalcium phosphate, Acid etching with Hydrofluoric acid, Hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid .Surface roughness levels were measured with the help of surface profilometer and surface analyzer. Surface wettability is measured with help of contact angle measurement using light microscope and surface configuration was determined with the help of scanning electron microscopy. Results: Titanium sheets Blasted with alumina (100), and dual etched with HCL+H2SO4 Showed highest surface roughness values, samples, blasted with biphasic material (combination of Hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate) showed uniform rougher surface in scanning electron pictomicrograph. And Samples blasted with biphasic material and those treated with Hydrofluoric acid 2% showed lowest contact angle Measurements. Conclusion: The modification of the titanium surface by both chemical and mechanical methods, have shown the uniform surface roughness and increase in the surface area of the samples.