RESUMO
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in elderly patients (≥65 years old) with multiple myeloma (MM) . Methods: From June 1, 2006 to July 31, 2020, 22 MM patients (≥65 years old) who were diagnosed in the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University and received novel drug induction followed by auto-HSCT were analyzed retrospectively. These patients were evaluated for important organ functions before transplantation, and the International Myeloma Working Group frail score was used in 2016 to screen out transplant-eligible patients. Results: The median (interquartile range, IQR) age at the time of transplantation of the 22 patients was 66.75 (IQR 4.50) years. A total of 20 patients received stem cell mobilization. The median number of mononuclear cells collected was 4.53×10(8)/kg, that of CD34(+) cells was 3.37×10(6)/kg, and the median number of apheresis procedures performed was 2. After stem cell transfusion, the median time of neutrophil implantation was 11 days, that of platelet implantation was 13 days, and the treatment-related mortality was 0 at 100 days after transplantation. The median follow-up was 48.7 months. The median time to progression time was not reached, and the median overall survival time was 111.8 months. Conclusion: Auto-HSCT is a safe and effective treatment for selected elderly patients of 65 years or older with MM.
Assuntos
Idoso , Humanos , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Objective: To study the efficacy, safety and long-term outcomes of integrated strategy of bortezomib-based induction regimens followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell (ASCT) and maintenance therapy in Chinese multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Methods: 200 MM patients receiving integrated strategy of bortezomib--based induction regimens followed by ASCT and maintenance therapy were retrospectively and prospectively analyzed from December 1. 2006 to April 30. 2018. Results: The complete remission rates (CR) and better than very good partial remission rates (VGPR) after induction therapy, transplantation and maintenance therapy were respectively 31% and 75.5%, 51.8% and 87.7%,73.6% and 93.4%. There was no difference between 4 cycles and more than 5 cycles induction chemotherapy. The negative rate of MRD detection by flow cytometry was 17.6% and 38.2% respectively after induction and 3 months after transplantation. The negative rate of MRD gradually increased during the maintenance therapy. The success rate of high dose CTX combined with G-CSF mobilization was 95.5% and transplantation related mortality (TRM) was zero. The median time to progress (TTP) was 75.3 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 99.5 months. TTP of patients obtaining CR and negative MRD after induction were longer that those of no CR and positive MRD. TTP and OS of patients receiving triple-drug induction and ASCT in early stage were longer than those of double-drug induction and ASCT in late stage. LDH≥240 U/L, high risk cytogenetics, ISS II+III stage and HBsAg positive were prognostic factors at diagnosis. However, only MRD and high risk cytogenetics were independent prognostic factors after transplantation and maintenance therapy. The clinical characteristics of patients of TTP ≥6 years were listed below: light-chain type M protein, ISS I stage, normal level of hemoglobin and platelet, normal LDH, HBsAg negative, chromosome 17p-negative, good response and sustained good response. Conclusions: Integrated strategy of bortezomib-based induction regimens followed by ASCT and maintenance therapy can significantly improve the short-term and long-term efficacy. The prognostic factors of TTP in different disease stages were different. Response to treatment, especially MRD, played a more important role in prognostic factors.
Assuntos
Humanos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib/uso terapêutico , Seguimentos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Quimioterapia de Indução , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Objective: To compare the efficacy, response and survival between high-dose melphalan (HDM) and cyclophosphamide+ etoposide+ busulfan (CVB) as the conditioning regimen in autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) . Methods: Retrospectively enrolled 123 consecutive NDMM patients who had received PAD induction with subsequent ASCT from Jan 2011 to Aug 2017. The CVB group and HDM group had 82 and 41 patients respectively. Results: ①No differences existed between these 2 groups in non-hematological side effects. ②Patients of CVB group had faster neutrophil and platelet engraftment time, with the median neutrophil engraftment time of 10 (9-35) day vs 11 (9-12) day for patients of HDM group (z=-3.433, P=0.001) , and with median platelet engraftment time of 11 (7-55) day vs 13 (10-35) day for patients of HDM group (z=-3.506, P<0.001) . CVB group entered neutropenia and severe thrombocytopenia more earlier than the HDM group, resulting similar neutropenia duration and severe thrombocytopenia duration between the CVB group and HDM group. However, patients of CVB group had significantly longer fever persistent time and antibiotic administration time. ③The response rate was significantly lower in patients of CVB group vs. patients of HDM group (9/46 vs 14/28, P=0.021) . Further, the minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rate at 3(rd) month post-transplantation seemed to be lower in CVB group than that in HDM group (31.7%vs 48.8%, P=0.065) . ④Both the univariate and multivariate analysis showed that HDM and CVB groups had similar duration to progression (TTP) (P=0.619) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.295) . Conclusion: HDM conditioning regimen is superior to CVB regimen in hematological side effects, tumor burden reduction and administration convenience. However, these two regimen had similar TTP and OS in MM patients receiving ASCT.
Assuntos
Humanos , Bussulfano , Ciclofosfamida , Combinação de Medicamentos , Etoposídeo , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Melfalan , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Transplante AutólogoRESUMO
<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Whether the sequential treatment with bortezomib plus dexamethasone (BD) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) could extend the overall survival period in multiple myeloma patients is still not clear. Few large case studies about this therapeutics in multiple myeloma were reported in China. Our purpose was to assess the efficacy and adverse effects of sequential treatment with BD chemotherapy and ASCT in patients with multiple myeloma.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Fifty-three patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma received BD as induction therapy before ASCT. Stem-cell mobilization was undertaken with cyclophosphamide 3 - 5 g/m(2) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 300 µg/d. Target yield was 2.0×10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Conditioning for ASCT consisted of melphalan 200 mg/m(2). Thalidomide and/or a-interferon was used as post-transplantation maintenance treatment.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The BD chemotherapy before transplantation was effective in 86.7% of the 53 patients, including 22.6% with complete remission (CR), 39.6% with near complete remission (nCR), and 24.5% with partial remission (PR). The best effect was achieved after two treatment courses. Most bortezomib-related adverse effects were classes 1 - 2. All patients were successfully mobilized after BD for autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The ASCT was effective in 96.3% of patients, including 49.1% with CR, 32.1% with nCR, and 15.1% with PR. The CR rate was significantly increased (49.1% vs. 22.6%, P < 0.05) by sequential ASCT. Within 27 (range, 6 - 53) months of follow-up, the efficacy of ASCT was maintained in 29 patients and further enhanced by post-transplantation maintenance treatment in four patients. Eleven patients died after transplantation. Among the patients undergoing BD/ASCT treatment, overall survival (OS) was significantly better in newly diagnosed patients in comparison to relapsed/refractory patients (P = 0.046).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>BD chemotherapy can be used as an induction therapy prior to ASCT in patients with multiple myeloma. Its rate of effectiveness is high and it alleviates symptoms quickly without affecting peripheral blood stem cell collection. The majority of adverse effects are mild (tolerable). Sequential BD with ASCT is the preferred option for transplant patients. First-line ASCT could prolong survival of newly diagnosed patients rather than delayed ASCT.</p>
Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ácidos Borônicos , Usos Terapêuticos , Bortezomib , Dexametasona , Usos Terapêuticos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Métodos , Mieloma Múltiplo , Tratamento Farmacológico , Terapêutica , Pirazinas , Usos Terapêuticos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
This study was purposed to investigate the B cell-activating factor belonging to the TNF family (BAFF) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) levels in bone marrow, and the BAFF receptor expression level on B cells in multiple myeloma (MM) patients, in order to explore the characteristics of B cells in bone marrow of MM patients. MM patients were studied before treatment (newly diagnosed group, 19 patients) and after treatment with improvement (stable group, 17 patients), 10 non-hematologic patients were selected as control (control group). The BAFF receptors (BAFF-R) and transmembrane activator and calcium modulator and cyclophilin ligand interactor (TACI) on B cell (CD19(+)), naive B cell (CD19(+)IgD(+)) and memory B cell (CD19(+)CD27(+)) of bone marrow in all groups were detected by flow cytometry. The BAFF, APRIL level in bone marrow supernatant were tested with ELISA. The results showed that the BAFF-R expression level on CD19(+) cells in newly diagnosed group were higher than that in stable group and control group; there was no significant difference between the BAFF-R expression level on CD19(+)IgD(+) cells in newly diagnosed group and stable group, but BAFF-R expression level on CD19(+)IgD(+) cells in newly diagnosed group was higher than that in control group; the BAFF-R expression level on CD19(+)CD27(+) cells in newly group was higher than that in stable group and control group; there was no significant difference between the BAFF-R expression level on CD19(+) cells, CD19(+)IgD(+) cells or CD19(+)CD27(+) cells in stable group and control group. There was no significant difference among the TACI expression level on CD19(+) cells, CD19(+)IgD(+) cells or CD19(+)CD27(+) cells in newly diagnosed group, stable group and control group. The bone marrow supernatant BAFF level in newly diagnosed group was higher than that in stable group and control group, but there was no significant difference between stable group and control group. There was no significant difference among the bone marrow TACI levels in newly diagnosed group, stable group and control group. It is concluded that both the bone marrow BAFF level and the BAFF-R expression level on CD19(+) cell, CD19(+)IgD(+) cells and CD19(+)CD27(+) cells in MM patients increase, which may help to stimulate B cells, thereby may relate with to MM pathogenesis.
Assuntos
Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fator Ativador de Células B , Metabolismo , Receptor do Fator Ativador de Células B , Metabolismo , Medula Óssea , Metabolismo , Mieloma Múltiplo , Metabolismo , PatologiaRESUMO
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To analyzed retrospectively two groups of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) receiving bortezomib and dexamethasone (VD) regimen and vincristine combined with pirarubicin and dexamethasone and melphalan(VADM) regimen.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Twenty-four patients were enrolled in a group of VD, receiving bortezomib 1.3mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8, 11 and dexamethasone 20mg on days 1-4 intravenously of every 21-day cycle. EBMT Standard was used to evaluate the efficacy and NCI-CTC V3.0 was used to decide the adverse effect. Thirty matched patients with newly diagnosed MM who received VADM were used as control group, receiving vincristine 0.4 mg/d and pirarubicin 9 mgxm(-2)xd(-1) and dexamethasone 20 mg/d and melphalan 12 mg/d on days 1 - 4 intravenously of every 28 day cycle.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>With a median follow-up of 10.5 months in VD group, there were 87.5% patients (21/24) responded, including 12 cases (50.0%) of complete remission (CR) or near complete remission (nCR). The total response rate (RR) was 76.7% in VADM group, with no significant difference in VD group (P = 0.483). CR + nCR rate was significantly higher in VD group than in VADM group (10%) (P = 0.001). RR and CR + nCR of light chain patients in VD group were significantly higher than in VADM group (P = 0.025 and 0.040, respectively). The median time to response and to best response were significantly shorter in VD group than in VADM group. In VD group, the RR of 8 patients with renal dysfunction was 87.5%, and that of 16 with normal renal function was 75% (P = 0.631). There was no significant difference in adverse effects between patient with renal dysfunction and normal function (P > 0.05). The main adverse effects in VD group were fatigue (66.7%), diarrhea (58.3%), peripheral neuropathy (54.2%), thrombocytopenia (29.2%), infection (29.2%), fever (25.0%) and constipation (25.0%). Most of the adverse effects were mild (grade 1 - 2) and could be relieved by symptomatic treatments. The most common adverse event in VADM group was neutropenia (83.8%), infection (35.5%), vomiting (35.5%), loss of hair (32.5%) and thrombocytopenia (16.2%).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>VD has higher CR + nCR rate compared with VADM and can be tolerant in most patients. VD is safe in patients with renal inadequacy.</p>
Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Usos Terapêuticos , Ácidos Borônicos , Bortezomib , Dexametasona , Seguimentos , Mieloma Múltiplo , Tratamento Farmacológico , Pirazinas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the influence of Imatinib on multiple myeloma cells expressing c-kit in vitro and its mechanism.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>KM3 cells were treated with Imatinib at different concentrations, and cell growth index were evaluated by XTT assay, cell cycle by flow cytometry, apoptosis by Annexin V/ PI and DNA ladder, and change in protein level by Western blot.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Imatinib inhibited proliferation of KM3 cells at concentrations more than 0.25 micromol/L in a dose-dependent manner, and the 48 h IC50 was 0.33 micromol/L (P < 0.01). Imatinib arrested cell in C0/G1 phase. Annexin V/PI staining and DNA ladder indicated that Imatinib had a substantial effect on inducing apoptosis of KM3 cells in a dose-dependent manner and induced pro-caspase-3 and poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) cleaved. Imatinib inhibited expression of c-kit and provoked a decrease of IL-6 induced c-kit phosphorylation in vitro.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Imatinib inhibits KM3 cells proliferation and induces the cells apoptosis by inhibiting c-kit signalling transduction.</p>