MMR trivalent vaccine based on safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity observed in 12-24 month-old healthy Filipino children: Evaluation of lot-to-lot consistency of a live-attenuated measles-mumps-rubella

In this double-blind, randomized single-dose study, 194 healthy Filipino children aged 12-24 months were randomized into three groups (1:1:1) to receive one of the three lots of live-attenuated measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine to assess lot-to-lot consistency in safety and immunogenicity. Adverse events were recorded during 43-day post-vaccination follow-up period. Antibody levels were measured using ELISA pre-vaccination and on Day-60. No statistically significant differences were observed across groups for overall incidences of local and general symptoms (p>0.05) or immune response rates against the three antigens (p=0.835, 0.458 and 0.222 for anti-measles, anti-mumps and anti-rubella, respectively). The three lots demonstrated consistency in their reactogenicity and immunogenicity profile.

Retrospective Surveillance for Intussusception in Children Aged Less than Five Years in a South Indian Tertiary-care Hospital.

To facilitate the assessment of the safety profile of rotavirus vaccines effectively, baseline data on intussusception are important for comparison with intussusception rates following the introduction of vaccine. The aim of the study was to describe epidemiological and clinical features of intussusception in children aged less than five years in an Indian medical facility. Hospital data on intussusception for children discharged during 1 January 2001–30 June 2004 from the Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India, were reviewed. Relevant information was extracted from medical records to classify cases according to the criteria of the Brighton Collaboration Intussusception Working Group. Complete review of medical records for clinical and demographic information was only performed for those cases fulfilling level 1 diagnostic certainty (definite intussusception) (Study ID 101245). During the surveillance period, 31 infants and children with definite intussusception were identified. The majority (61.2%) of the cases occurred in the first year of life. The male : female ratio was 3.4 : 1. Intussusception cases occurred round the year with no distinct seasonality. No intussusception-associated death was recorded. This study provides baseline data on intussusception in South India. Cases identified in the study were similar in presentation and demographics as those observed in other Asian settings. Prospective surveillance systems, using standardized case definitions will further increase the understanding of the aetiology and epidemiology of intussusception, especially as new rotavirus vaccines are made available.

Epidemiology of intussusception in Malaysia: a three-year review.

This study aimed to document the baseline incidence and epidemiology of intussusception (IS) in Malaysia. This retrospective surveillance examined hospital discharge data from three hospitals in Malaysia to identify IS cases over a 3-year period (2000-2003) in children <5 years of age. Identification of definite cases of IS was done through a search of computerized hospital discharge records (ICD-9-CM code 560.0) followed by confirmation of diagnosis through medical record review. The definition of IS was based on the clinical guidelines from the IS Brighton Collaboration Working Group, version 2002. During the 3-year study period, there were 62 cases hospitalized due to IS, of which 74.2% were < 1 year of age. The incidences for hospitalization due to IS in children < 1 year old and < 5 years old averaged 17.8 and 4.8 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. No IS-associated deaths were recorded and all IS cases had a favorable outcome. No distinct seasonality with IS occurrence was observed.

Four is better than nine. a combined diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-hepatitis B-Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine for routine immunization in Malaysia.

Malaysian infants would have to receive nine injections during the first few months of life in order to be protected against disease caused by hepatitis B (HBV), diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) if single HBV and Hib vaccines were used. We evaluated a combined DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine administered at 1.5, 3 and 5 months after a birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine (HBV). One month after completion of the primary vaccination, 99% of subjects had seroprotective anti-HBV antibody levels, and at least 98% had seroprotective antibodies against diphtheria, tetanus, and Hib, and were seropositive for pertussis antibodies. The immune response to the combined vaccine was comparable to that induced by separate injections with DTPw, HBV and Hib vaccines. Overall, the DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine was as well tolerated as separate administration of DTPw, HBV and Hib vaccines. The combined DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine induces protection against five diseases as recommended in the Malaysian routine vaccination schedule. Use of the combined DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine can reduce the required number of injections from nine to four in the first few months of life.

The immunological response of Thai infants to haemophilus influenzae type B polysaccharide-tetanus conjugate vaccine co-administered in the same syringe with locally produced diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine.

OBJECTIVE: Comparing the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of three vaccine combinations. These were GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals' (GSK) Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (Hib-TT, Hiberix) administered with the local Government Pharmaceutical Organization's (GPO) diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis whole cell (DTPw) vaccine, Hib-TT mixed with GPO's DTPw vaccine, or Hib-IT mixed with GSKs' DTPw vaccine (Tritanrix). MATERIAL AND METHOD: An open, randomized, controlled, single center study of three hundred and sixty infants. They were randomized into three groups to receive either Hib-TT Hiberix mix with GPOs' DTPw vaccine (group 1), Hib-TT mixed with GPO's DTPw vaccine (group 2), or Hib-TT mixed with GSKs' DTPw vaccine (Tritanrix; group 3) at two, four and six months of age. RESULT: One month after the third dose, all subjects had antibodies level against Hib polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) > or = 0.15 microg/ml. All 11 subjects except two (in group 2) had anti-PRP levels > or = 1.0 microg/ml. The geometric mean concentrations were similar in all three groups. Over 96% of the subjects in all three groups demonstrated an immunological response to diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis antigens. There was no diference among the three groups in terms of severe local reaction and fever. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that the combined vaccines produced an effective antibody response with no increase in reactogenicity compared to separately administrated vaccines.

Flexibility in the administration schedule of varicella vaccination in healthy adolescents and young adults.

A clinical trial to assess the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of two doses of varicella vaccine (live attenuated Oka-strain, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals), when either given 8 or 4 weeks apart in healthy seronegative adolescents and young adults, was conducted in Khon Kaen and Bangkok, Thailand. Contrary to seroconversion rates generally reported for this age group, in our study all subjects were already seropositive after the first vaccine dose. After the first vaccine dose, geometric mean titers (GMTs) for anti-varicella antibodies were 78.4 (median 64) for the adolescent group and 136.5 (median 128) for the young adult group. Six weeks after administration of the second dose, anti-varicella GMTs reached 331.7 (median 256) and 636.9 (median 512) for the adolescent and young adult groups, respectively, with a 4.2-4.7-fold increase from pre-vaccination titers. The difference in GMTs between post-dose I and dose II was statistically significant for each group. The reactogenicity after the first and second doses of vaccination was low: no varicella rash was seen, in either the shorter or longer schedule. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals varicella vaccine (Varilix) offered a high flexibility, administration possible at either 4 or 8 weeks interval, whilst eliciting good immunogenicity and good tolerability.