RESUMO
Objective@#To observe the permeability of four kinds of self-etching adhesives in aged glass-fiber-reinforced composite (GFRC).@*Methods@#After light polymerization following the manufacturers’ instructions, a total of 80 pieces of bisphenol-A-glycodal-methacrylate (Bis-GMA)+ polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) based GFRC were randomly divided into two main groups: test group and control group, each group was then divided into four subgroups with 10 samples for each subgroup. While the test group was conducted to be aged through thermocycling at 5 ℃/55 ℃, the control group remained fresh. After the addition of a fluorescent dye (rhodamine-B-isothiocyanate), four self-etching adhesives AdperEasy One (AEO), S 3 BOND (S 3B), Tetric N-Bond Self-Etch (TNB), G-Bond (GB) were correspondently applied to the test and control groups and were light polymerized. Specimens were sectioned using hard tissue cutting and grinding system. Slices from each subgroup were observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope, the depth of dye permeation (DDP) under the surface of GFRC in each group was measured and the Results were statistically analyzed.@*Results@#The DDP of AEO was the deepest (32.58 ± 6.06) μm, and that of TNB was the shallowest (6.19 ± 1.38)μm among the four self-etching adhesive subgroups in the control group. The order of each group was AEO > GB > S 3B > TNB. The DDP of the four subgroups in the test group was significantly shallower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The change in GB was the greatest (9.05 ± 2.35)μm/(28.93 ± 5.32)μm. In the test group, the DDP in AEO was the deepest (28.42 ± 5.32)μm, and the DDP in TNB was shallowest (1.93 ± 0.22)μm again. The order of each group was AEO > S 3B > GB > TNB. In the test group, while the layer of fluorescent dye of AEO and S 3 B could still be seen distinctly, that of TNB and GB was hard to recognize. @*The DDP of AEO was the deepest (32.58 ± 6.06) μm, and that of TNB was the shallowest (6.19 ± 1.38)μm among the four self-etching adhesive subgroups in the control group. The order of each group was AEO > GB > S 3B > TNB. The DDP of the four subgroups in the test group was significantly shallower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The change in GB was the greatest (9.05 ± 2.35)μm/(28.93 ± 5.32)μm. In the test group, the DDP in AEO was the deepest (28.42 ± 5.32)μm, and the DDP in TNB was shallowest (1.93 ± 0.22)μm again. The order of each group was AEO > S 3B > GB > TNB. In the test group, while the layer of fluorescent dye of AEO and S 3 B could still be seen distinctly, that of TNB and GB was hard to recognize. @#The self-etching adhesives of AEO and S 3 B still have good permeation effect in this kind of aged GFRC, which can help to establish a good bond between these aged GFRC and the subsequent repair of composite resin.
RESUMO
Objective@# By analyzing changes of dental arch width and length during the aligning and leveling period (non-extraction case) with two kinds of self-locking bracket, compare the difference between the active self-locking bracket with the passive bracket.@*Methods@#The data of dental arch perimeter change amount and dental arch width and length change amount (WU/L3, WU/L4, WU/L5, WU/L6, U/LL) were statistically analyzed using the correlation and regression method by comparing active and passive brackets for the correction of dental arch variations. Two different brackets for the correction of the measured values of the dental arch variations was analyzed by t-test. Results There were statistical relationships between the amount of arch perimeter increase and the amount of width and length increase. The regression equation was statistically significant (P < 0.05), It was greater impacted arch width increase to arch perimeter in the self-locking. The t-test results showed WU3, WL3, WL6, LR 4 measured values (P < 0.05) statistically significant in the active self-locking group and passive group. @*Results @#There were statistical relationships between the amount of arch perimeter increase and the amount of width and length increase. The regression equation was statistically significant (P < 0.05), It was greater impacted arch width increase to arch perimeter in the self-locking. The t-test results showed WU3, WL3, WL6, LR 4 measured values (P < 0.05) statistically significant in the active self-locking group and passive group. @*Conclusin @#Active and passive self-locking bracket have good arch expansion effecting. The active self-locking bracket is slightly dominant than the passive bracket in the expansion of the canine width whereas the active self-locking bracket is better than the passive in the expansion of the mandibular first molar and arch perimeter which should be widely applied to the appropriate cases.