Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop ; 46(1): 100-102, Jan.-Feb. 2013. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-666803

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be difficult to detect at the clinical practice. METHODS: We analyzed 140 MRSA isolates from inpatients to correlate the antimicrobial susceptibility with the SCCmec types. RESULTS: Type III (n = 63) isolates were more resistant to ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, cloramphenicol, erythromycin, gentamicin, and rifampin than type IV (n = 65) ones (p < 0.05). Moreover, type IV isolates were susceptible to tetracycline (100%) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (98%), while type III isolates presented resistance to them. CONCLUSIONS: In regions where these SCCmec types are prevalent, the detection of specific resistant phenotypes could help to predict them, mainly when there are no technical conditions to SCCmec typing.


Assuntos
Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Tetraciclina/farmacologia , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/farmacologia , Cromossomos Bacterianos/genética , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Genótipo , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Fenótipo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA