Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Journal of Breast Cancer ; : 87-90, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-77077

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients with clinically negative axilla will ensure axillary dissection only for cases with lymph node metastasis and provide information about pathologic staging as accurate as the axillary dissection. It was shown that SLNB could be successfully performed regardless of the type of biopsy. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of SLNB after excisional biopsy. METHODS: One hundred patients diagnosed with excisional biopsy or guide wire-localization and operated on with SLNB between February 2007 and March 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. SLNB was performed with 10 cc of 1% methylene blue alone or both methylene blue and 1 mCi of Tc-99m nanocolloid combination. Age, tumor localization and size, length of the biopsy incision, size of the biopsy specimen, multifocality, lymphovascular invasion, tumor grade, staining with methylene blue, localization, number and metastatic status of the lymph nodes stained, and success rate with a gamma probe were evaluated. RESULTS: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) could not be identified in 9 (16.9%) of patients in the methylene blue group (n=53). In the combination group (n=47), SLN could not be identified in one patient. Of 32 patients with negative SLNB, metastatic involvement was found to be present in 5 patients after axillary lymph node dissection (false negatives). The average numbers of SLNs found in the methylene blue group and combination group were 1.4 and 1.6, respectively. SLN detection and false negative rates in the methylene blue group were 83% and 15.7%, respectively. The rates for the combination group were 98% and 6.4%, respectively. None of the parameters related to patient, tumor or process were found to affect detection rates of SLN. CONCLUSION: Only SLNB using a combination method is a safe and reliable technique for breast cancer patients diagnosed with excisional biopsy.


Assuntos
Humanos , Axila , Biópsia , Mama , Neoplasias da Mama , Sacarose Alimentar , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfonodos , Azul de Metileno , Metástase Neoplásica , Nitrilas , Piretrinas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela
2.
Journal of Breast Cancer ; : 434-440, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-56434

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The impact of time of surgery based on the menstrual cycle is a controversial issue. Two decades after the first interest in this topic, a number of studies with conflicting results have not helped to resolve this problem. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the impact of timing of surgery based on the menstrual cycle on survival rates of breast cancer patients, and various clinical and hormonal classifications of the menstrual cycle were compared in order to determine the phase of the menstrual cycle which showed the highest degree of surgical survival. METHODS: Premenopausal breast cancer patients treated with curative surgery between 1998 and 2002 were prospectively included in this study. Patients were divided into different groups according to the first day of their last menstrual cycle using three different classifications (clinical, Hrushesky, Badwe), and were also grouped according to their serum hormone levels. Serum levels of follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estrogen, and progesterone were measured on the day of surgery. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included in the study. Median follow-up time was 90 months. Nineteen patients (21.1%) had loco-regional recurrence and/or distant metastases while 12 patients (13.3%) died during follow-up. Five-year (78.6% vs. 90.6%) and 10-year (66.7% vs. 90.6%) disease-free survival (DFS) rates of patients in the clinically defined follicular phase were significantly decreased compared to luteal phase. On the other hand, hormonally determined phases of the menstrual cycle and grouping of patients according to clinical classifications did not show an impact on prognosis. CONCLUSION: In the current study performing surgery in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle decreased DFS in premenopausal patients. According to these results, performing surgery during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle might have a beneficial effect on survival.


Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Mama , Neoplasias da Mama , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Estrogênios , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante , Fase Folicular , Seguimentos , Mãos , Fase Luteal , Hormônio Luteinizante , Ciclo Menstrual , Metástase Neoplásica , Progesterona , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Taxa de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA