RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Urinary trypsin inhibitors (UTI) have been widely used for the treatment of diseases including disseminated intravascular coagulation, shock, and pancreatitis. Since UTI synthesis is likely to be reduced in patients who have undergone liver resection, the incidence of inflammatory reactions may be increasing accordingly. For such patients, the liver enzyme increases after the operation can reflect liver damage. The purpose of this study was to examine if ulinastatin can inhibit liver enzyme increases after liver resection. METHODS: After receiving Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review was performed on 201 patients who underwent hepatic resection from 2006 to 2010. We divided the records into the control (n = 69) and ulinastatin (n = 132) groups according to the use of intraoperative ulinastatin and compared the preoperative and postoperative laboratory test results. The number of patients who had > 400 U/L elevation of aspartate transaminase (AST) level after surgery was compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The mean AST, alanine transaminase (ALT), and total bilirubin levels after liver resection were significantly lower in the ulinastatin group than in the control group. The number of patients who showed an AST > 400 U/L after liver resection was significantly higher in the control group (odds ratio = 3.02). CONCLUSIONS: Ulinastatin attenuates the elevation of hepatic enzymes and bilirubin after liver resection.
Assuntos
Humanos , Alanina Transaminase , Aspartato Aminotransferases , Bilirrubina , Coagulação Intravascular Disseminada , Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa , Glicoproteínas , Hepatectomia , Incidência , Fígado , Testes de Função Hepática , Pancreatite , Estudos Retrospectivos , Choque , Tripsina , Inibidores da TripsinaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The analgesic mechanisms of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors have been explained mainly on the basis of the inhibition of prostaglandin biosynthesis. However, several lines of evidence suggest that their analgesic effects are mediated through serotonergic or adrenergic transmissions. We investigated the roles of these neurotransmitters in the antinociception of a selective COX-2 inhibitor at the spinal level. METHODS: DUP-697, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, was delivered through an intrathecal catheter to male Sprague-Dawley rats to examine its effect on the flinching responses evoked by formalin injection into the hindpaw. Subsequently, the effects of intrathecal pretreatment with dihydroergocristine, prazosin, and yohimbine, which are serotonergic, alpha1 adrenergic and alpha2 adrenergic receptor antagonists, respectively, on the analgesia induced by DUP-697 were assessed. RESULTS: Intrathecal DUP-697 reduced the flinching response evoked by formalin injection during phase 1 and 2. But, intrathecal dihydroergocristine, prazosin, and yohimbine had little effect on the antinociception of intrathecal DUP-697 during both phases of the formalin test. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal DUP-697, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, effectively relieved inflammatory pain in rats. Either the serotonergic or adrenergic transmissions might not be involved in the analgesic activity of COX-2 inhibitors at the spinal level.