A comparison of the ELISA with other serological tests in the serodiagnosis of amoebiasis.

The sera of 78 patients with invasive amoebiasis were tested for antiamoebic antibodies by the techniques of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), indirect haemagglutination (IHA), indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) and counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIEP). Results showed that the ELISA compared favourably with IHA and IFA tests in terms of sensitivity and specificity. ELISA, IHA and IFA detected 97.4%, 96.2% and 98.7% of the patients respectively. CIEP was the least sensitive of the 4 serological methods with a sensitivity of 88.5%. The advantages and disadvantages of the 4 serodiagnostic procedures are discussed.

Determination of antiamoebic IgG, IgM, IgA and IgG subclasses in sera from patients with amoebiasis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

The HK-9 strain of Entamoeba histolytica was cultured axenically. A crude extract of the trophozoites was used as antigen in the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the determination of antiamoebic IgG, IgM, IgA and IgG subclasses in sera of patients with E. histolytica infection. Sera from amoebiasis patients had significantly higher mean ELISA values for all classes and subclasses of immunoglobulins examined compared with healthy controls. The ELISA for IgG, IgM and IgA was positive for 76 (97.4%), 34 (43.6%) and 62 (79.5%) respectively of 78 amoebiasis sera. Analysis of IgG subclasses by ELISA showed that 76.7%, 25%, 33.3% and 66.6% of the patients were positive for antiamoebic IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4 respectively. IgG1 and IgG4 were the dominant IgG subclasses involved in amoebiasis. The role of antiamoebic antibodies in amoebiasis is discussed.