Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 297-302, 2020.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-869649

RESUMO

Objective:To analyze the predictive factors of GGU between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology based on 2014 ISUP grouping system, then establish and evaluate nomogram.Methods:Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in Shanghai Ruijin Hospital from March 2012 to March 2019 were reviewed, and the clinical and pathological information were collected. Age(68.1±7.2), body mass indes(BMI) (24.2±3.2)kg/m 2, prostate specific antigen(PSA) 11.5(6.7-20.4)ng/ml, prostate specific antigen destiny(PSAD) 0.35(0.20-0.66). Before March 2017, the number of biopsy cores were 6 to 8; After then, all patients toke 12 cores systemic biopsy. Based on 2014 ISUP grouping system, the differences between biopsy and radical prostatectomy grades were counted. The independent predictors of GGU were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, then the nomogram for predicting GGU were established and evaluated. Results:429 patients were enrolled. There were 161 (37.5%) patients in GGU group and 268 (62.5%) patients in non-GGU group. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, body mass index (BMI)>28 kg/m 2( OR=2.54, P=0.021), prostate specific antigen density (PSAD)( OR=1.65, P=0.018)and 2014 ISUP grouping sysyem ( OR=0.53, P<0.001) of biopsy specimen were independent impact factors of GGU. The predicting model was established according to BMI, PSAD and 2014 ISUP grouping system. The area under the ROC cure of the model was 0.735 (95% CI 0.681-0.789). The nomogram model was well calibrated, with the mean absolute error of 6.7%, which means the prediction of GGU is fairly consistent with the actual situation. Conclusions:Based on the 2014 ISUP grouping system, BMI>28 kg/m 2, PSAD and 2014 ISUP grouping of biopsy specimen were independent predictors of GGU. The nomogram model for predicting GGU has a good statistical significance.

2.
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ; (53): 6397-6400, 2008.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-407004

RESUMO

Alginate fiber is prepared by wet spinning method.The preparation process of alginate fiber is:dissolution,filtration,deaeration,figuration,stretching,washing,drying and convoluting.At present,one of thebiodegradable fibers studied the most is alginate fiber.The material,principle and producing technology of alginatefibers are introduced in this article and its application in wound dressings are underlined.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA