RESUMO
La transmisión de leishmaniasis tegumentaria (LT) se incrementó desde 1985 en 9 provincias argentinas. Santa Fe y Entre Ríos en dicho período no notificaron casos de transmisión autóctona comprobada, sin embargo en el año 2003 ocurrió un brote epidémico en Bella Vista, Corrientes, localidad que se encuentra en un área con continuidad ecológica y contigüidad geográfica con ambas provincias. Por ello, para determinar el riesgo potencial de transmisión de LT en las áreas próximas y al sur de Bella Vista se realizaron capturas de Phlebotominae en febrero del 2004, colectándose sobre las márgenes del río Paraná en Santa Fe (El Rabón, Villa Ocampo, Cayastá) y en Entre Ríos (La Paz, La Celina-Villa Urquiza) 860 ejemplares de Lutzomyia neivai (99.5%) y Lu. migonei (0.5 %), ambas especies con capacidad vectorial para Leishmania (V.) braziliensis. En Tartagal, Santa Fe, las capturas fueron consistentes con el paisaje de «chaco¼ residual: 7 ejemplares de Lu. nerivai, Lu. migonei y Lu. cortelezzii. Se destaca el riesgo potencial de transmisión epidémica de LT en estas provincias, especialmente por la tropicalización progresiva hacia el sur de la selva en galleria paranaense. Se recomiendan actividades de vigilancia clínica y vectorial.
The transmission of tegumentary leishmaniasis (TL) has increased in 9 provinces of Argentina since 1985. Santa Fe and Entre Ríos did not record in this period autochtonous probed cases: however, an epidemic outbreak took place in 2003 in Bella Vista, Corrientes, located in an area with ecological continuity and contiguous to both provinces. In order to evaluate the potential risk of transmission of LT, Phlebotominae were captured at locations close to and southern from Bella Vista during February 2004. The traps located on the shores of Parana river in Santa Fe (El Rabón, Villa Ocampo, Cayastá), and Entre Ríos (La Paz. La Celina-Villa Urquiza) captured 860 individuals of Lutzomyia neivai (99.5%) and Lu. migonei (0.5 %), both species with vectorial capacity for Leishmania (V.) braziliensis. In Tartagal, Santa Fe, the captures were consistent with the residual «chaco¼ landscape, 7 individuals of Lu. nerivai, Lu. migonei and Lu. cortelezzii. The risk of LT epidemic transmission in these provinces is highlighted, mainly due to the progressive southern tropicalization of the paranaense gallery forest. Clinical and entomological surveillance is recommended.
Assuntos
Humanos , Animais , Insetos Vetores/fisiologia , Leishmaniose Cutânea/transmissão , Psychodidae/fisiologia , Argentina/epidemiologia , Controle de Insetos , Leishmaniose Cutânea/epidemiologia , Densidade Demográfica , Psychodidae/patogenicidadeRESUMO
Leptospirosis is produced by a bacteria belonging to the Leptospira genus. Water contaminated with this germ which comes from the urine of infected animals is an excellent source of infection for mammals. It gets into the human body through the skin or mucus. The aims of this work were to describe the cases that occurred during the first five months of 2001, and to determine the causes of this phenomenon. There was a total of 49 patients confirmed by the laboratory, 39 of whom completed the epidemiologic form; 24 of whom were over 15 years of age, 19 were male cases, 13 of whom involved in semiurban jobs; 82
mialgias and 48.7
presented the conjunctivitis shot; 61.5
a meningeal, and 18.5
respiratory and renal syndrome. These patients had a low level of education, with unstable jobs and lots of rodents in or near their houses. The structure of these houses was precarious, with a deficient system of water drainage. Fifty percent of the patients had primary instruction, 11.1
secondary instruction, one was illiterate, and none had gone to university. Patients coming from rural areas (an outbreak), belonged to a higher social and economic condition and had got infected through exposure in relation with their jobs. Sources of infection in the rural patients were different from those of the urban patients: in the former they were related to the presence of rodents, which related to the type of work, while in the urban cases they had to do with the poverty of their living conditions.