Establishment of hierarchical management standard in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from the perspective of pharmacists based on Delphi method / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To develop a standard of hierarchical management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease （COPD） from the perspective of pharmacists. METHODS The triangle hierarchical management model was used as the framework. Through literature research， the indicators of the hierarchical management standard for COPD patients were preliminarily compiled. A questionnaire was designed and administered to 18 experts， and Delphi method was conducted in two rounds to determine the contents of the standard. RESULTS The response rates for both rounds of expert consultation were 100%， with both authority coefficients of experts of 0.903 and Kendall coordination coefficiens of 0.279 and 0.189 for each indicator. The final established standard of hierarchical management for COPD patients included 25 stratified indicators and 17 pharmaceutical hierarchical management indicators. There were 9， 8 and 8 indicators in the high-risk， medium-risk， and stable layers， respectively， considering three aspects： disease， medication， and self-management level. The corresponding first-level， second- level， and third-level pharmaceutical management included 6， 6 and 5 indicators， respectively， including inhalation technical guidance， medication adherence guidance， treatment monitoring， and follow-up， etc. CONCLUSIONS The standard of hierarchical management for COPD patients established by Delphi method is scientific and reliable， which can provide a reference for pharmacists to carry out hierarchical management of COPD patients in China.

Effects of ivabradine on vascular endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease：a meta-analysis / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of ivabradine on vascular endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS PubMed， Embase， the Cochrane Library， Web of Science， CNKI， Wanfang Data， VIP and CBM databases were retrieved to collect randomized controlled trials （RCTs） about ivabradine （intervention group） versus placebo or β-blocker （control group） from the inception to Mar. 20th 2023. The meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.4 software after literature screening， data extraction and quality evaluation. RESULTS A total of 12 RCTs were included， involving 1 206 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that the levels of flow-mediated dilation （FMD） [MD＝1.71， 95%CI （0.96， 2.46）， P＜0.000 01] and nitric oxide （NO） [MD＝5.80， 95%CI （5.02， 6.59）， P＜0.000 01] in the intervention group were significantly higher than control group， while endothelin-1（ET-1） level was significantly lower than control group [MD＝－7.45， 95%CI （－8.42， －6.47）， P＜0.000 01]. There was no statistical significance in nitroglycerin-mediated dilation （NMD） level between 2 groups [MD＝0.13， 95%CI（－0.74， 1.00）， P＝0.77]. Subgroup analyses based on the different medications and intervention time in the control group showed better improvement in FMD level of patients receiving ivabradine， compared with placebo （P＜0.05）； compared with placebo and β-blocker， the level of NO in patients receiving ivabradine was improved significantly （P＜0.05）， while ET-1 level was decreased significantly （P＜0.05）. Regardless of the duration of the intervention， the levels of FMD， NO， and ET-1 in the intervention group were significantly improved compared to the control group （P＜0.01）， while the difference in NMD was not statistically significant （P＞0.05）. CONCLUSIONS Ivabradine can improve vascular endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease.

Pharmacoeconomics of ivabradine in the treatment of CHF in the context of “Quadruple Therapy” / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ivabradine in the treatment of chronic heart failure （CHF） in the context of “Quadruple Therapy” from the perspective of the health system. METHODS Based on real-world cohort data， the Markov model was constructed according to the natural progression of CHF， with a cycle time of 3 months， a study timeframe of 20 years， and a discount rate of 5%. Using quality-adjusted life year （QALY） and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios （ICER） as the output indexes， the cost-utility analysis was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ivabradine in combination with the “Quadruple Therapy” regimen， compared with the “Quadruple Therapy” regimen for the treatment of CHF， and the robustness of the results of the base analysis was verified by univariate sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS The results of the base analysis showed that the ICER of ivabradine combined with the “Quadruple Therapy” regimen was 165 065.54 yuan/QALY， compared with the “Quadruple Therapy” regimen， which was lower than the willingness-to-pay （WTP） threshold （257 094 yuan/QALY） based on 3 times of China’s gross domestic product （GDP） per capita in 2022. The results of the univariate sensitivity analysis showed that the discount rate had the greatest impact on the robustness of the model. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability that the ivabradine combined with the “Quadruple Therapy” regimen was cost-effective under the WTP threshold in this study was 59.50%. CONCLUSIONS When using 3 times China’s 2022 GDP per capita （257 094 yuan/ QALY） as the WTP threshold， the combination of ivabradine and the “Quadruple Therapy” regimen for treating CHF is cost- effective.

A real-world study of effectiveness and safety of generic and original clopidogrel in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of domestic generic and imported original clopidogrel for antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome （ACS）. METHODS The clinical data of ACS patients in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of China Pharmaceutical University from January 2020 to June 2021 were retrospectively collected by using electronic medical record system， and the patients were divided into original drug group （321 cases） and generic drug group （328 cases） according to the drug use. Both groups were given dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin. The effectiveness and safety outcomes of the two groups were followed up for 12 months and compared， the related influential factors were analyzed. RESULTS Major adverse cardiovascular events （MACE） occurred in 16 and 22 patients in original drug group and generic drug group respectively， including nonfatal myocardial infarction （4 and 5 cases）， stroke （2 and 4 cases）， revascularization （8 and 3 cases）， cardiovascular related death （2 and 4 cases）， and all-cause death （4 and 6 cases）. There were 12 and 7 patients with major bleeding events， 38 and 29 patients with minor bleeding events， and 33 and 21 patients with non-bleeding adverse events. There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of related events （P values of Log-Rank tests were all greater than 0.05）. Cox regression analysis showed that the use of generic clopidogrel did not increase the risk of MACE and major bleeding events in ACS patients [hazard ratio of 1.305 and 0.416， 95% confidence interval of （0.678， 2.512） and （0.155， 1.117）， respectively， P＞0.05]， and the combination of proton pump inhibitors （PPI） could reduce the risk of major bleeding events [hazard ratio of 0.196， 95% confidence interval of （0.063， 0.611）， P＜0.05]. CONCLUSIONS Compared with imported original drug， domestic generic clopidogrel has similar clinical effectiveness and good safety. Combined use of PPI may be a beneficial factor to reduce the occurrence of major bleeding events in patients.