Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Br J Med Med Res ; 2016; 11(4): 1-7
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-181958

RESUMO

Aims: To compare blood loss following vaginal delivery by two different methods: visually estimated blood loss (vEBL) and calculated estimate of blood loss (cEBL). Study Design: Postpartum blood loss was analyzed during 2 different time frames: 1. Traditional estimation (vEBL) of blood loss and 2. Following training, with the use of a systematic method (cEBL). Place and Duration of Study: Department of Labor and Delivery at Maricopa Medical Center in Phoenix, Arizona. Charts were reviewed from September and October 2009 and from September 2010. Methodology: This was a retrospective cohort study in which blood loss was compared using two different methods. Traditional physician estimate of blood loss at vaginal delivery, “vEBL” was compared to a more formal determination of blood loss “cEBL” - calculated blood loss. Results: The cEBL subjects (mean age 28.0+/-6.6) were significantly older than the vEBL subjects (mean age 25.4+/-5.8). The two groups were otherwise similar. Mean blood loss was compared across the two methods using Analysis of Variance. Mean blood loss was 324 for the cEBL group, and 309 for the vEBL group (F(1,192)=0.76, p=.385). Although the difference in mean blood loss was not statistically significant, the variance of the cEBL method was significantly larger (P<.0005). 2/94 (2.1%) of patients in the vEBL group were noted to have blood loss ≥500cc; 11/100 (11%) of patients in the cEBL group were noted to have blood loss ≥500cc. Conclusion: The variance for the cEBL method was significantly greater than in the vEBL group, suggesting that postpartum hemorrhage may be diagnosed sooner with this method. As calculation of blood loss postpartum is increasingly endorsed we recommend further study to determine the typical range for blood loss with measurement via this technique.

2.
Br J Med Med Res ; 2014 July; 4(21): 3844-3855
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-175326

RESUMO

Aims: To describe and present results of preconception care services aimed at underserved women who have experienced an adverse birth outcome. Study Design: Retrospective descriptive study. Place and Duration of Study: Sample: Maricopa Integrated Health System’s Internatal Clinic, a public safety-net hospital in Phoenix, Arizona USA, between March 2008 and October 2011. Methodology: 102 women who have experienced a prior preterm birth or stillbirth currently enrolled in an “Internatal Clinic” where interconception and prenatal care is provided. The interventions included education by clinicians and trained support staff, support groups, a walking program to address physical activity, contraception, folic acid intake, dental care, overweight/obesity, mental health and substance use issues prior to a future pregnancy. Chart reviews were performed and a preconception health survey addressing knowledge (pre/post) and patient satisfaction were analyzed using descriptive and univariate statistics. Results: Of current enrollees (N=102), 79% have been in the program for 12 to 18 months. 100% of those with mental health needs have had them addressed, 93% of those not desiring pregnancy are using contraception, 75% are consuming a folate supplement, 53% are engaging in regular exercise and 37% had oral health needs addressed despite no insurance coverage. Of the 102 patients, only 21% had a normal body mass index (18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2). Improvements in patient knowledge and attitudes were documented. Conclusion: Women in our program had improved preconception knowledge, attitudes and behaviors.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA