Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 30(1): e5, 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-768261

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of mucositis and peri-implantitis associated with the use of two types of implants—conventional versus platform switching after one year of loading. A longitudinal study of 64 implants in 25 patients was performed. Clinical variables, such as clinical pocket depth and bleeding upon probing, plaque, mobility, gingival recession, clinical attachment loss, and radiographic bone loss, were analyzed. The case definition for peri-implantitis was established as pockets of ≥ 5 mm with bleeding and bone loss ≥ 2 mm. One year after implant loading, the prevalence of mucositis and peri-implantitis with conventional implants (CIs) was 81.2% and 15.6%, respectively. For platform switching implants (PSIs) the prevalence was 90% and 6.6%, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.5375). However, there was a trend towards a lower prevalence of peri-implantitis with platform switching Implants.


Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Implantes Dentários/efeitos adversos , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante/efeitos adversos , Mucosite/epidemiologia , Peri-Implantite/epidemiologia , Perda do Osso Alveolar/etiologia , Perda do Osso Alveolar , Estudos Transversais , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante/métodos , Mucosite/etiologia , Mucosite , Projetos Piloto , Peri-Implantite/etiologia , Peri-Implantite , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA