Evaluation of microleakage and the degree of conversion of three composite resins polymerized at different power densities / Avaliação da microinfiltração e do grau de conversão de três resinas compostas polimerizadas em diferentes densidades de potência

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the degree of conversion (DC) and microlekage scores of three different composite resins polymerized with a LED curing device in standard and extra-power mode. Material and Methods: One bulk-fill (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk-Fill ­ TECBF) and two conventional composite materials (Clearfil Majesty Posterior ­ CMP and Tetric EvoCeram ­ TEC) were evaluated. A total of 30 specimens were prepared for six groups (N = 5). These groups were polymerized with a LED curing device as follows: TECBF-6: 3200mW/cm2 for six seconds, TECBF-20: 1000mW/cm2 for 20 seconds, CMP-6: 3200mW/cm2 for six seconds, CMP-20: 1000mW/cm2 for 20 seconds, TEC-6: 3200mW/cm2 for six seconds, TEC - 20: 1000 mW/cm2 for 20 seconds. After 24 hours of water storage, DC was measured by Raman spectroscopy. Microleakage scores of the six groups were bonded to various adhesive systems (Clearfil SE Bond or Adhese Bond Universal) were also evaluated at Class II box cavities (N = 10). Results: While the highest DC was found at the top (TECBF-20= 79.92% and TECBF-6= 79.02%) and bottom surfaces (TECBF-20 = 68.94% and TECBF-6= 71.04%) for TECBF groups, TEC groups (TEC-20top = 59.06%, TEC-6top=49.66%, TEC-20bottom = 43.72% and TEC-6bottom= 40.68%) showed the lowest DC for the both surfaces (p < 0.05). Polymerization of materials in standard or extra-power mode was similar to DC (p > 0.05). Microleakage scores were found to be similar (p > 0.05). Conclusion: According to the results of the study, different power densities of LED curing light did not affect the DC of composite resins and microleakage values of restorations at small Class II cavities (AU)

Objetivo: este estudo tem como objetivo avaliar os graus de conversão (DC) e microinfiltração de três diferentes resinas compostas polimerizáveis com um dispositivo de luz por LED nos modos padrão e no modo de alta-potência. Material e métodos: uma resina bulk-fill (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk-Fill - TECBF) e dois materiais resinosos convencionais (Clearfil Majesty Posterior - CMP e Tetric EvoCeram - TEC) foram avaliados. Um total de 30 espécimes foram preparados e divididos em seis grupos (N = 5). Esses grupos foram polimerizados com um dispositivo de luz de LED da seguinte forma: TECBF-6: 3200mW / cm2 por seis segundos, TECBF-20: 1000mW / cm2 por 20 segundos, CMP-6: 3200mW / cm2 por seis segundos, CMP20: 1000mW / cm2 por 20 segundos, TEC-6: 3200mW / cm2 por seis segundos, TEC - 20: 1000 mW / cm2 por 20 segundos. Após 24 horas de armazenamento em água, a DC foi medida por espectroscopia Raman. Os escores de microinfiltração dos seis grupos dos vários sistemas adesivos (Clearfil SE Bond ou Adhese Bond Universal) também foram avaliados nas cavidades Classe II (N = 10). Resultados: embora a maior CD tenha sido encontrada nas partes superior (TECBF-20 = 79,92% e TECBF-6 = 79,02%) e inferiores (TECBF-20 = 68,94% e TECBF-6 = 71,04%) para grupos TECBF, os grupos TEC (TEC-20top = 59,06%, TEC-6top = 49,66%, TEC-20bottom = 43,72% e TEC-6bottom = 40,68%) apresentaram as menores CD para as ambas as partes (p < 0,05). A polimerização de materiais no modo padrão ou alta-potência foi semelhante à DC (p > 0,05). Os escores de microinfiltração foram semelhantes (p > 0,05). Conclusão: de acordo com os resultados do estudo, diferentes densidades de potência da luz de LED não afetaram as CD das resinas compostas e os valores de microinfiltração das restaurações em pequenas cavidades da Classe II. (AU)

Effect of ejaculation on serum prostate-specific antigen concentration

ABSTRACT Abstract Purpose:To evaluate the effect of ejaculation on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations in patients with lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS). Materials and Methods Our study includes 98 men (62 study and 36 control). After three days of sexual abstinence, blood samples were drawn for the measurement of baseline PSA levels. Then the patients were told to ejaculate. One, 5, 24 and 72 hours after ejaculation, serum total (tPSA), free (fPSA) and complexed PSA (cPSA) levels were measured. Serum PSA sampling was performed at the same intervals in the control group without ejaculation. Results The mean age in study and control groups patients were 59.03±0.99 years, 61.14±1.30 years, respectively. In the study group, changes in tPSA and fPSA levels after ejaculation were found statistically significant while changes in cPSA levels and f/tPSA ratios were not significant (p=0.016, p=0.0003, p=0.176, and p=0.173, respectively). Baseline values showed significant differences with 1st and 5th hours. No significant changes in tPSA, fPSA, cPSA levels and f/tPSA values were found in control group (p=0.223, p=0.224, p=0.444, and p=0.718, respectively). The changes in the number of patients exceeding the cutoff values after ejaculation were not statistically significant for tPSA, cPSA, and f/tPSA ratio. Conclusions In this study, ejaculation increased tPSA and fPSA concentrations but it didn’t have a significant effect on serum cPSA levels and f/tPSA ratios. However, recent ejaculation may affect the biopsy indication at least near cut off PSA values. Further studies are needed to explain the mechanisms of alterations in the concentration of PSA.

Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux with polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer and dextranomer/hyaluronic acid in adults

Purpose Aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer and polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer in endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux disease in adult patients with and without chronic renal failure. Materials and Methods Thirty two patients (12 female, 20 male) with a total of 50 renal units were treated for vesicoureteral reflux. There were 26 (81%) chronic renal failure patients. The success of treatment was evaluated by voiding cystouretrography at 3rd and 12th months after subureteric injection. The persistence of reflux was considered as failure. Patients were divided into two groups according to injected material. Age, sex, grade of reflux and treatment results were recorded and evaluated. Results Reflux was scored as grade 1 in seven (14%), grade 2 in 16 (32%), grade 3 in 21 (42%) and grade 4 in six (12%) renal units. There was not patient with grade 5 reflux. Fourteen renal units (28%) were treated with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (group 1) and 36 renal units (72%) were treated with polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (group 2). The overall treatment success was achieved at 40 renal units (80%). The treatment was successful at 11 renal units (79%) in group 1 and 29 renal units (81%) in group 2 (p = 0.71). There was not statistically significant difference between two groups with patients with chronic renal failure in terms of treatment success (p = 1.00). Conclusions The effectiveness of two bulking agents was similar in treatment of vesicoureteral reflux disease in adult patients and patients with chronic renal failure. .