Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine ; : 342-350, 2020.
Artigo | WPRIM | ID: wpr-831831

RESUMO

Background/Aims@#To date, prospective data are limited on efficacy and safety profiles of statin therapy in Korean hypercholesterolemic patients. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the practice patterns of statin therapy and its efficacy and safety through the prospective Daegu and Gyeongbuk statin registry. @*Methods@#Statin naïve patients who were prescribed statins according to the criteria of Korean Guidelines for Management of Dyslipidemia were enrolled. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed at baseline and at week 8, where the efficacy was assessed with the same guidelines. @*Results@#Of 908 patients, atorvastatin and rosuvastatin were most frequently prescribed statins (63.1% and 29.3%, respectively). High intensity statins (atorvastatin 40 mg or rosuvastatin 20 mg) were prescribed in 24.7% of all patients and in 79.5% of high and very high risk groups. The total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels decreased from 203.7 ± 43.0 to 140.6 ± 28.6 mg/dL and 134.4 ± 35.7 to 79.5 ± 21.3 mg/dL, respectively. The achievement rate of the LDL target goal was 98.6% in low risk, 95.0% in moderate risk, 88.1% in high risk, and 42.1% in very high risk patients (59.7% in overall). There was no significant difference in the efficacy between atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. Adverse events were observed in 12.0% of patients and led to 1.4% of treatment cessation. @*Conclusions@#The efficacy of the usual starting dose of statins in daily practice was relatively insufficient for Korean hypercholesterolemic patients with high or very high risks. Short-term adverse events of statin therapy were not common in Korean patients with a low discontinuation rate.

2.
Korean Circulation Journal ; : 795-798, 2004.
Artigo em Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-214539

RESUMO

Inappropriate administration of thrombolytic agents to acute type A aortic dissection patients with acute myocardial infarction could result in catastrophic outcomes. A 38-year-old female patient without any previous cardiac history visited the emergency room due to a severe acute onset of retrosternal chest pain. The ECG showed a complete heart block with a junctional escape rhythm at 33 beats/min and more than 2 mm of ST elevation in the inferior and anterior precordial leads. Because of an acute myocardial infarction, prompt thrombolytic agent (tPA) was administered. The patient had cardiogenic shock and persistent chest pain after the thrombolytic therapy. We performed the transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). The TTE showed a dissection flap just above the aortic valve and akinesia of the inferior wall of the left ventricle. She underwent an emergency surgical correction. However, the patient died due to the failure of weaning from the cardiopulmonary bypass machine.


Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Valva Aórtica , Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Dor no Peito , Ecocardiografia , Eletrocardiografia , Emergências , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Fibrinolíticos , Bloqueio Cardíaco , Ventrículos do Coração , Infarto do Miocárdio , Choque Cardiogênico , Terapia Trombolítica , Nações Unidas , Desmame
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA