Assessing the Clinical Competence of Family Medicine Clerkship Students Using the OSCE

BACKGROUND: Although medical students' clinical competence should be assessed systematically and objectively, written exams or faculty's subjective methods were used in the past. We assessed the clinical competence of the family medicine clerkship students using the OSCE and evaluated the reliability and the validity of the OSCE. The purpose of this study was to find the logistic problems and the feasibility of the OSCE to an entire clerkship evaluation. METHODS: Twenty six volunteers took part in the OSCE. Ten, 5-minute long stations, were divided into 4 areas: 3 for history taking, 3 for physical exam, 3 for technical skill, and 1 for interview skill areas. RESULTS: Eleven students were examined on first session and 15 students on second session 4 weeks later. The mean OSCE score was 65.5 5.63. The reliability of the total stations was 0.615. The total OSCE score was not different by the sessions, but there was a significant difference in the two stations where the examiners had been changed. There were statistically significant correlations between the total OSCE score and the two previous written exams (r=0.56, 0.54, P<0.01). There was no significant logistic problem and the examinees showed positive responses to the OSCE. CONCLUSION: The OSCE was a useful tool for assessing the clinical competence of family medicine clerkship students. The reliability of the OSCE was moderate and in order to extend the OSCE to an entire clerkship evaluation, we need further study to acquire a higher reliability and validity.

The effects of performance status, clinical symptoms and laboratoy data on length of survival of advanced cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed as an advanced cancer and families need accurate information about the length of survival in order to plan for and to make the best use of the time that remains. The health care of that patient can then be redirected toward palliation and mobilizing resources to ensure a comfortable life. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the prognostic value of performance status plus some physical symptoms and some biological indices and there fore to assist in planning appropriate palliative care. METHODS: This study was performed on 161 patients, who had been diagnosed as advanced cancer in Korea University Guro Hospital from July 1999 to July 2000. : We requested Karnofsky performance status scale, mental status, jaundice, severity of pain, anorexia, voiding difficulty, dyspnea and dry mouth We assessed the biological indices by leukocyte count, plasma albumin, proteinuria. RESULTS: We could confirm 82 patients' death(54.37) of 151 patients. Univariate analysis showed that Karnofsky performance status scale, mental status, jaundice, severity of pain, anorexia, voiding difficulty, dyspnea, dry mouth, leukocyte count, albumin and proteinuria demonstrated a statistically significant predictive prognosis. Multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazard model showed that age, performance status, albumin, proteinuria were independent predictors of survival and severity of pain had the borderline value. CONCLUSION: Age, performance status, albumin and proteinuria were the independent prognostic factors for patients with advanced cancer.