RESUMO
Background@#Measurement of ABO isoagglutinin titers is important for patients who have received an ABO-incompatible organ transplant. Specifically, IgG isoagglutinin is essential for predicting graft outcomes in kidney transplantation, but many laboratories measure only the total isoagglutinin taking into consideration time and labor efficiency. In this study, we propose a useful method for predicting IgG isoagglutinin by analyzing the mathematical relationship between total and IgG isoagglutinin titers. Furthermore, the effects of patients’ characteristics of isoagglutinin were also analyzed. @*Methods@#From January 2017 to April 2022, the results of 3,676 total/IgG isoagglutinin titers of 65 patients who underwent liver and kidney transplantation were analyzed. Isoagglutinin titration was performed using the column agglutination technique with serially diluted serum samples and dithiothreitol was added for measuring IgG isoagglutinin. A generalized estimation equation (GEE) and the Deming regression were used to analyze the relationship and agreement of total/IgG isoagglutinin titers. @*Results@#In A, B, and O types, total isoagglutinin titers were 1.6 (2
RESUMO
Background@#In the author’s blood bank, if the Ab screening test results are positive in the pretransfusion test, an Ab identification test and polyspecific direct antiglobulin test (DAT) are performed. IgG and C3 monospecific DATs are also performed if the polyspecific DAT is positive. To perform additional tests, clinical technologists used to communicate with the clinical department by telephone, and then the clinical doctor issued the orders.There could be problems with this process, such as clerical errors and reduced work efficiency. Therefore, this study developed the secondary order program to improve the work efficiency of the blood bank. @*Methods@#The secondary order program that allows the laboratory medicine doctors to issue additional test orders, print out barcodes in blood bank, and immediately report the results to the EMR (Electronic Medical Record) was developed. Before (Jul 2018∼Jun 2019) and after (Jul 2019∼Jun 2020) applying the program to inpatients, the number of telephone calls, Ab screening tests, Ab identification tests, polyspecific DAT, and monospecific DAT were compared to evaluate the effectiveness of the program. @*Results@#After applying the program, 515 calls per year (average 43 calls per month) were reduced. Before the program, the results of 68 Ab screening tests and 16 polyspecific DATs were not reported on EMR, but no case was missed after the program. @*Conclusion@#Through the secondary order program, the work efficiency of the blood bank was improved. It is expected that expanding this program to other blood bank tests will help implement tests faster and make them more systematic.
RESUMO
Background@#In the author’s blood bank, if the Ab screening test results are positive in the pretransfusion test, an Ab identification test and polyspecific direct antiglobulin test (DAT) are performed. IgG and C3 monospecific DATs are also performed if the polyspecific DAT is positive. To perform additional tests, clinical technologists used to communicate with the clinical department by telephone, and then the clinical doctor issued the orders.There could be problems with this process, such as clerical errors and reduced work efficiency. Therefore, this study developed the secondary order program to improve the work efficiency of the blood bank. @*Methods@#The secondary order program that allows the laboratory medicine doctors to issue additional test orders, print out barcodes in blood bank, and immediately report the results to the EMR (Electronic Medical Record) was developed. Before (Jul 2018∼Jun 2019) and after (Jul 2019∼Jun 2020) applying the program to inpatients, the number of telephone calls, Ab screening tests, Ab identification tests, polyspecific DAT, and monospecific DAT were compared to evaluate the effectiveness of the program. @*Results@#After applying the program, 515 calls per year (average 43 calls per month) were reduced. Before the program, the results of 68 Ab screening tests and 16 polyspecific DATs were not reported on EMR, but no case was missed after the program. @*Conclusion@#Through the secondary order program, the work efficiency of the blood bank was improved. It is expected that expanding this program to other blood bank tests will help implement tests faster and make them more systematic.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: According to increased availability and awareness of automated blood bank analyzer with its speed and efficiency, use of automated analyzer in hospital blood bank has been increasing rapidly. We compared the ABO blood group typing results between automated analyzer IH-500 and manual method in healthy adults and patients with ABO discrepancies to provide useful information on interpretation of blood grouping results by automated analyzer. METHODS: Among healthy adults who underwent medical examinations, 400 samples (each 100 samples of A, B, O and AB type) were selected and evaluated the results and grades of blood grouping by automated and manual methods. Also, 50 samples showing ABO discrepancies among patients requested for pretransfusion test were selected and compared between two methods. As for samples with ABO discrepancies, further tests such as microscopic examination, reactivity with anti-A1 or ABO genotyping along with medical record review were performed. RESULTS: Agglutination results and grades in healthy adults were consistent between two methods. Meanwhile, 30 (60%) of ABO discrepant samples were related to rouleaux formation and their frequencies and agglutination grades were higher in automated method (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=0.001). Results of discrepant samples caused by unexpected antibody or ABO subgroup showed no differences between two methods. CONCLUSION: IH-500 automated analyzer was considered useful for mass examination of healthy individuals. Meanwhile, considering the fact that ABO discrepancies by rouleaux formation were more frequent and stronger in automated method, it is recommended to retest their results by manual methods along with medical record review.