RESUMO
There have been controversies on the effect of albumin in treating edema in nephrotic syndrome patients. We evaluated the additive diuretic effect of coadministration of furosernide with albumin in the six patients with nephrotic syndrome. We administered 160mg of furosemide intravenously for 1 hour with 100rnl of 20% albumin or 5% dextrose by random cross-over design. The urine and plasma furosemide concentrations were measured by HPLC. After the administration of furosemide alone, urine volume, urinary excretions of sodium and chloride were increased significantly compared to those of basal state (P<0.05). But, coadministration of furose-mide with albumin did not increase significantly the urine voume (2285+/-445ml vs. 3023+/-715ml), urinary excretions of sodium (194+/-58rnmol/day vs. 282+/-85 mmol/day) and chloride (213+/- 54mmoVday vs. 286+/- 74mmoVday) comparing to those of furosemide only cases. Addition of albumin to furosemide did not significantly changed pharmacokinetic parameters such as AUC (28.3+/-5.5ug/ml hr vs 36.0+/-6.7ug/ml hr), total plasma clearance (115+/-30mVmin vs 108+/-41ml/min), volume of distribution (0.13+/-0.02L/kg vs 0.10+/- 0.01L/kg), elirnination half life (1.4+/-0.3hr vs 1.5+/-0.3hr), and urine furosemide excretion (44+/-8% vs 43+ 10%). We concluded that albumin infusion did not enhance the diuretic action of furosemide pharmacodynamically and pharmacokinetically in patients with nephrotic syndrome.
Assuntos
Humanos , Área Sob a Curva , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Estudos Cross-Over , Diuréticos , Edema , Furosemida , Glucose , Meia-Vida , Síndrome Nefrótica , Farmacocinética , Plasma , SódioRESUMO
Differentiation of renal(RH) and non-renal(NRH) hematuria is important in the diagnosis and treatment of the patients with hematuria. Recently, urine RBC immunoperoxidase(IPx) staining method was developed, but there was no report on the usefulness of IPx in Korea. We validated the usefulness of IPx by comparing with the PCM. Both PCM and IPx were performed at the same time in 26 patients with RH confirmed by renal biopsy and 23 patients with NRH confirmed by radiologic and/or pathologic studies who were admitted to Chungbuk National University Hospital from January 1996 to December 1996. The age of RH and NRH group were 36.6+/-15.0 and 56.5+/-22.2 years. 35.7+/-30.4% of urine RBC were stained by IPx in RH group and only 1.6+/-4.4% were stained in NRH group(P<0.001). 23.4+/-29.9% of urine RBC by PCM were counted as dysmorphic RBC in RH group and 5.7+/-13.6% were counted in NRH group(P<0.05). At the cut-off value of 20%, the sensitivity and specificity of IPx were 57.7% and 100%. At the cut-off value of 30%, those of PCM were 30.9% and 95.7%, respectively. When comparing overall test performance by calculating AUCs of ROC(receiver operating characteristics) curve, IPx was better than PCM. IPx was better than PCM in localizing the origin of hematuria. The NRH might be excluded when IPx(+) cells are more than 20% of total urine RBC.