Effect of Bone Cement Volume and Stiffness on Occurrences of Adjacent Vertebral Fractures after Vertebroplasty

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to find the optimal stiffness and volume of bone cement and their biomechanical effects on the adjacent vertebrae to determine a better strategy for conducting vertebroplasty. METHODS: A three-dimensional finite-element model of a functional spinal unit was developed using computed tomography scans of a normal motion segment, comprising the T11, T12 and L1 vertebrae. Volumes of bone cement, with appropriate mechanical properties, were inserted into the trabecular core of the T12 vertebra. Parametric studies were done by varying the volume and stiffness of the bone cement. RESULTS: When the bone cement filling volume reached 30% of the volume of a vertebral body, the level of stiffness was restored to that of normal bone, and when higher bone cement exceeded 30% of the volume, the result was stiffness in excess of that of normal bone. When the bone cement volume was varied, local stress in the bony structures (cortical shell, trabecular bone and endplate) of each vertebra monotonically increased. Low-modulus bone cement has the effect of reducing strain in the augmented body, but only in cases of relatively high volumes of bone cement (>50%). Furthermore, varying the stiffness of bone cement has a negligible effect on the stress distribution of vertebral bodies. CONCLUSION: The volume of cement was considered to be the most important determinant in endplate fracture. Changing the stiffness of bone cement has a negligible effect on the stress distribution of vertebral bodies.

Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Effect of Coflex(TM) on the Lumbar Spine

OBJECTIVE: The biomechanical properties of the Coflex(TM) (Paradigm Spine, NY, USA), a device designed to provide dynamic stabilization without lumbar fusion, have not been clearly defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and biomechanical effect of Coflex(TM) using finite element model (FEM). METHODS: A 3D geometric model of the L3-L5 was created by integrating computerized tomography (CT) images. Based on the geometric model, a 3D FEM was created and the Coflex(TM) model was incorporated into the base model. Mechanical load dependent on the postural changes and boundary conditions, were imposed to simulate various 3D physiological states. The simulation analysis included stress and strain distributions, intervertebral disc deformation, and the range of motion of the facet joint and lumbar spinous process. RESULTS: Coflex(TM) significantly restrained displacement in extension, lateral bending and compression of joint between the L4-5 as one in the experimental group was observed -1.3% of flexion, -24.5% of extension, -44.5% of lateral bending and -37.2%. The average intradiscal pressure of the L4-5 decreased by 63% and the average facet contract force of the L4-5 decreased markedly by 34% in the experimental group. A load of 120 MPa from extension was observed at the base of spinous process in the experimental group. CONCLUSION: The Coflex(TM) can be safely used for achieving functional dynamic stabilization of the lumbar vertebral column while preserving the intactness of the other components. However, the fatigue fracture of the L4 spinous process should be carefully monitored.