High prevalence of indinavir-associated renal complications in Thai HIV-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Indinavir (IDV) is the protease inhibitor (PI) used most often in resource-limited countries. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of IDV-associated renal complications as well as their clinical characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The authors reviewed all patients participating in cohorts of indinavir-containing regimens at the HIV-NAT research center during the period of indinavir treatment. Patients who had pre-existing renal diseases were excluded. Renal toxicities included presence of urologic symptoms, nephrolithiasis, abnormal urine sediments, crystalluria and loss of renal function. Radiological studies of KUB system were reviewed as well. RESULTS: Two-hundred and four patients treated with IDV were included. Median (IQR) follow up period was 216 (150-312) weeks. One hundred and eighty patients were treated with ritonavir-boosted regimens at some point, and 24 patients were treated only with unboosted regimens. Leukocyturia (51.9%) was the most common finding of IDV-associated renal complications. Thirty-five percent of patients had urologic symptoms such as flank pain or dysuria. Almost half of the patients had significant loss of renal function that was associated with prolonged use of IDV The most common radiological finding was nephrolithiasis. Less common, but of greater clinical importance, are nephrocalcinosis or renal atrophy. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of IRC was found in Thai HIV-infected patients. As long as no other cost-effective boosted PI regimens are available, strategies to prevent irreversible loss of renal function are warranted.

Significant differences between plasma HIV-1 RNA assays in HIV-1 subtype E infected patients treated with antiretroviral therapy.

A total of 72 HIV-1 infected Thai patients treated with didanosine (ddI) or stavudine (d4T) plus ddI at the time of interim analysis were analyzed. Sixty patients (83%) carried subtype E documented by HIV-1 V3 serotyping. HIV-1 RNA levels were measured using three commercial viral load assays. At baseline (n = 57), Quantiplex 2.0 and NucliSens 2.0 showed mean log10 HIV-1 RNA of 0.7 log10 or 5 fold lower than Amplicor 1.5 (mean 4.29 versus 5.0 log10, respectively, p < 0.001). At week 20 of treatment (n = 29), HIV-1 RNA levels were detected in 55.2%, 31%, and 33.5% of subjects tested by Amplicor 1.5, Quantiplex 2.0, and NucliSens 2.0, respectively. In conclusion: plasma HIV-1 RNA analyses showed comparable values with Quantiplex 2.0 and NucliSens 2.0 assays. In contrast, Amplicor 1.5 resulted in approximately 5 folds higher HIV-1 RNA levels and a 25% higher rate of detection of plasma HIV-1 RNA as compared to the other two assays. As the current goal of therapy is to suppress plasma viral load below the detection limit of the assays, the significant differences between the assays may influence antiretroviral efficacy evaluation and management.