Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology ; : 421-424, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-114078

RESUMO

We present a 17-year-old man who underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging and laboratory exams for uncontrolled seizure. Patients with an autistic disorder require deep sedation or, occasionally, general anesthesia even for radiologic exams or simple procedures. The anesthetic management of an obese, violent patient with a severe autistic disorder and mental retardation can be challenging to anesthesiologists and requires a more careful approach in selecting adequate anesthetics and doses. This case emphasizes the importance of having a detailed plan to ensure the smooth process of premedication, anesthetic induction, maintenance, emergence and safe discharge of incorporated patients in the event of unexpected situations. A 5% lidocaine patch to relieve the pain from the intramuscular injection and intravenous cannulation, intramuscular midazolam as premedication, and propofol for the maintenance of sedation can be a good sedation protocol in incorporated patients.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Animais , Humanos , Anestesia Geral , Anestésicos , Transtorno Autístico , Encéfalo , Cateterismo , Crista e Barbelas , Sedação Profunda , Injeções Intramusculares , Deficiência Intelectual , Lidocaína , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Midazolam , Obesidade , Pré-Medicação , Propofol , Convulsões
2.
Yonsei Medical Journal ; : 649-653, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-22415

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Pain in terminal cancer patients may be refractory to systemic analgesics or associated with adverse drug reactions to analgesics. Epidural analgesia has been effectively used in such patients for pain control. However, this method does not provide pain relief to all patients. The efficacy and complications of continuous epidural analgesia were evaluated for expanding efficacy in terminal cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The charts of patients who received epidural analgesia for over 5 years for the control of terminal cancer pain were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients received 127 epidural catheters. The mean duration for epidural catheterization was 31.5+/-55.6 (5-509) days. The dose of epidural morphine increased by 3.5% per day. The efficacy of epidural analgesia at 2 weeks follow up revealed improved pain control (n=56), as the morphine equivalent drug dose dropped from 213.4 mg/day to 94.1 mg/day (p<0.05) at 2 weeks follow up. Accordingly, after 2 weeks institution of epidural analgesia, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of patients with severe pain, from 78.1% to 19.6% (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia was an effective pain control method in patients with terminal cancer pain, however, a systematized algorithm for the control of cancer-related pain in needed.


Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Bupivacaína/uso terapêutico , Morfina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/fisiopatologia , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA