The Clinical Results after Posterior Ligaments Preserving Fenestration in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: The Port-Hole Decompression / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To describe the technical skills and to estimate the clinical outcomes of port-hole decompression preserving the posterior ligaments during lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2014 and March 2016, a total of 101 patients who underwent port-hole decompression were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age was 71.3 years (58–84 years) and there were 46 males and 55 females. The mean follow-up period was 18 months. Degenerative spondylolisthesis was observed in 24.8% of patients (25/101). Port-hole decompression was performed by removing the central portion of the distal part of the upper lamina with a burr. Then, the contralateral side of ligamentum flavum and hypertrophied facet joints were removed. We estimated the lumbar lordotic angle using radiographs, and measured the depth from skin to upper lamina central area using magnetic resonance imaging axial images. We estimated the mean slip angle and mean degree of slip in preoperative and postoperative radiography in standing flexion and extension. We also measured the operational time, length of skin incision, and blood loss. The clinical results were estimated by a walking distance caused by neurologic intermittent claudication, visual analogue scale, and Oswestry disability index. RESULTS: Most patients were generally older, and the mean lordotic angle was 25.3°, which is considered to be lower when compared with younger people. The mean depth from skin to lamina was mean 5.4 cm. With respect to the radiological results, there were no significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative groups. The operation time, length of skin incision, and bleeding were not increased proportionally to the operation level. The walking distance caused by neurologic intermittent claudication, visual analogue scale, and Oswestry disability index of the post-operative group were all improved compared with the pre-operative group. CONCLUSION: The port-hole decompression, which decompresses the contralateral side while preserving the posterior ligaments and facet joints may be a useful technique for elderly patients with multiple level stenosis, minimizing spinal segmental instability.

The Result of Repeat Discectomy for Ipsilateral Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To analyze the result of a repeat discectomy for ipsilateral recurrent lumbar disc herniation and to investigate the potential factors that influenced the outcomes for this surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients, who underwent reoperation after lumbar discectomy with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, were reviewed. The surgical outcome was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Macnab classification, and the recovery rate was calculated in accordance with VAS. A statistical analysis was carried out by SPSS to evaluate the possible factors that may have influenced the outcomes of the reoperation. RESULTS: The rate of reoperation after lumbar disc surgery due to the recurrent disc herniation was 6.0% (59/983 cases). The average recovery rate of VAS from the 1st operation was approximately 77%, and from the 2nd operation was 71%. According to the Macnab criteria, the results were “excellent” or “good” in 96% of cases. Statistical analysis revealed that there was no difference of the average recovery rate (p<0.05). There is no additional instability after repeat discectomy. Factors, such as smoking, precipitating traumatic events, and diabetes mellitus did not have much influence on the average recovery rate after repeat discectomy for ipsilateral recurrent lumbar disc herniation. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of repeat discectomy were satisfactory. Moreover, factors, smoking, trauma history and diabetic mellitus, only had a minor impact on the outcomes of a repeat discectomy.

More than 5-Year Follow-up Results of Two-Level and Three-Level Posterior Fixations of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures with Load-Sharing Scores of Seven and Eight Points

BACKGROUND: The development of pedicle screw-based posterior spinal instrumentation is recognized as one of the major surgical treatment methods for thoracolumbar burst fractures. However, the appropriate level in posterior segment instrumentation is still a point of debate. To assesses the long-term results of two-level and three-level posterior fixations of thoracolumbar burst fractures that have load-sharing scores of 7 and 8 points. METHODS: From January 1998 to May 2009, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and radiologic outcomes of 45 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures of 7 and 8 points in load-sharing classification who were operated on using two-level posterior fixation (one segment above and one segment below: 28 patients, group I) or three-level posterior fixation (two segments above and one segment below: 17 patients, group II). Clinical results included the grade of the fracture using the Frankel classification, and the visual analog score was used to evaluate pain before surgery, immediately after surgery, and during follow-up period. We also evaluated pain and work status at the final follow-up using the Denis pain scale. RESULTS: In all cases, non-union or loosening of implants was not observed. There were two screw breakages in two-level posterior fixation group, but bony union was obtained at the final follow-up. There were no significant differences in loss of anterior vertebral body height, correction loss, or change in adjacent discs. Also, in clinical evaluation, there was no significant difference in the neurological deficit of any patient during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, two-level posterior fixation could be used successfully in selected cases of thoracolumbar burst fractures of 7 and 8 points in the load-sharing classification.