Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of Functioning Assessment Short Test in Bipolar Disorder

Objective@#The Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) is a relatively specific test for bipolar disorders designed to assess the main functioning problems experienced by patients. This brief instrument includes 24 items assessing impairment or disability in 6 domains of functioning: autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues, interpersonal relationships, and leisure time. It has already been translated into standardized versions in several languages. The aim of this study is to measure the validity and reliability of the Korean version of FAST (K-FAST). @*Methods@#A total of 209 bipolar disorder patients were recruited from 14 centers in Korea. K-FAST, Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument Brief Form (WHOQOL-BREF) were administered, and psychometric analysis of the K-FAST was conducted. @*Results@#The internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) of the K-FAST was 0.95. Test-retest reliability analysis showed a strong correlation between the two measures assessed at a 1-week interval (ICC = 0.97; p ＜ 0.001). The K-FAST exhibited significant correlations with GAF (r = −0.771), WHOQOL-BREF (r = −0.326), YMRS (r = 0.509) and BDRS (r = 0.598). A strong negative correlation with GAF pointed to a reasonable degree of concurrent validity. Although the exploratory factor analysis showed four factors, the confirmatory factor analysis of questionnaires had a good fit for a six factors model (CFI = 0.925; TLI = 0.912; RMSEA = 0.078). @*Conclusion@#The K-FAST has good psychometric properties, good internal consistency, and can be applicable and acceptable to the Korean context.

Korean Medication Algorithm for Depressive Disorder: Comparisons with Other Treatment Guidelines

We aimed to compare the recommendations of the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder 2012 (KMAP-DD 2012) with other recently published treatment guidelines for depressive disorder. We reviewed a total of five recently published global treatment guidelines and compared each treatment recommendation of the KMAP-DD 2012 with those in other guidelines. For initial treatment recommendations, there were no significant major differences across guidelines. However, in the case of nonresponse or incomplete response to initial treatment, the second recommended treatment step varied across guidelines. For maintenance therapy, medication dose and duration differed among treatment guidelines. Further, there were several discrepancies in the recommendations for each subtype of depressive disorder across guidelines. For treatment in special populations, there were no significant differences in overall recommendations. This comparison identifies that, by and large, the treatment recommendations of the KMAP-DD 2012 are similar to those of other treatment guidelines and reflect current changes in prescription pattern for depression based on accumulated research data. Further studies will be needed to address several issues identified in our review.

Korean Medication Algorithm for Depressive Disorder 2012 (III): The Subtypes of Depression / 대한정신약물학회지

OBJECTIVE: Recently, the pharmacotherapy including antidepressants in treating depression is widely used. However, as a result of newer agents that are continuously introduced, pharmacological treatment strategy is also changing. To catch up this trend, Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder was developed in 2002 and revised in 2006. Since the last revision, the third revision reflected the new research result and the latest trends in the areas of pharmacological treatment. METHODS: One hundred and twenty three psychiatrists who have vast clinical experiences in depressive disorder are primarily selected then survey was sent to them via mail, 67 surveys were retried. This survey is constructed with 44 questionnaires in which contained from overall treatment strategies to treatment strategies under the specific circumstances. Each treatment strategy or treatment option is evaluated with the overall score of nine and the following 95% confidence interval result treatment option were divided into three phases of recommendation; primary, secondary, tertiary. RESULTS: For dysthymic disorder, antidepressant monotherapy including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) [(es)citalopram, fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine], serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) (venlafaxine, duloxetine, milacipran), and mirtazapine, was recommended as the first line medications. For melancholic type, SSRI, SNRI, and mirtazapine were recommended as the first line medications. For atypical type and seasonal pattern, bupropion as well as SSRI, SNRI, and mirtazapine, were recommended as the first line medications. CONCLUSION: The preferences of antidepressants in experts were different according to the subtype of depression. These results suggest that clinicians have to consider the subtype of depression in the treatment of depressive disorders.

Korean Medication Algorithm for Depressive Disorder (IV): Child and Adolescent/The Elderly/Female / 대한정신약물학회지

OBJECTIVE: Since the introduction of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in 1980s, there have been many changes in the treatment strategies for depressive disorders. To be of help for clinicians to select appropriate treatment strategies, Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Major Depressive Disorder was developed in 2002 and revised in 2006. To reflect changes in treatment pattern for depressive disorders since 2006, we revised the previous algorithm and developed Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder 2012 (KMAP-DD 2012). METHODS: 123 psychiatrists who have vast clinical experiences in treating depressive disorders are primarily selected, and the survey was sent to them via mails. Among them, 67 psychiatrists answered the survey. This survey was composed of 44 questionnaires of which the contents covered from overall treatment strategies to treatment strategies under the specific circumstances. Based on 95% confidence interval and overall scores, each treatment of option was classified into three categories of recommendation; first-line, second-line, and third-line treatment option. RESULTS: In child and adolescent, antidepressant monotherapy was selected as first-line treatment option for mild, moderate, and severe episode without psychotic features. The combination of antidepressant and atypical antipsychotics was advocated as first-line treatment option for severe episode with psychotic features. In geriatric depression, antidepressant monotherapy was advocated as treatment of choice for mild to moderate episode. For severe episode without psychotic features, antidepressant monotherapy was selected as first-line treatment option. For severe episode with psychotic features, combination of antidepressant and atypical antipsychotics was selected as treatment of choice. In premenstrual dysphoric disorder, antidepressant monotherapy was advocated as first-line treatment option. In postpartum depression, antidepressant monotherapy was selected as first-line treatment option for mild to moderate episode. For severe episode without psychotic features, both antidepressant monotherapy and combination of antidepressant and atypical antipsychotics were selected as first-line treatment option. For severe episode with psychotic features, both combination of antidepressant and atypical antipsychotics and combination of mood stabilizer and atypical antipsychotics were advocated as first-line treatment option. CONCLUSION: In KMAP-DD 2012, the recommendations for treatment options in Child and Adolescent Depressive Disorder and Geriatric Depression were newly introduced. In aspects of treatment options for Female Depression, KMAP-DD 2006 and KMAP-DD 2012 had some similarities. But there were some changes of the treatment strategies in KMAP-DD 2012 which seemed to reflect recent study results.

Hyponatremia with Neurological Symptom in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia : Five Cases / 대한정신약물학회지

Hyponatremia frequently occurs in patients with chronic schizophrenia and has various causes such as compulsive drinking, neuroleptics, and physical illness. If not corrected immediately, it leads to severe problems such as seizures, change in mental status, and even death. We detected five cases of hyponatremia with neurological symptoms in patients with chronic schizophrenia. One case had a long history of primary polydipsia, whereas the other four cases had no history of polydipsia. We speculated that the cause in these latter four cases was neuroleptics or physical illness. All five cases improved with conservative treatment. Possible implications and the need for future study are discussed.